On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:36:08 -0500
Steve Clark wrote:
> If is a drop in replacement for yum - then why not call it yum, then
> there is "no" learning curve.
>
It's not a d.i.r.:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/193312.html
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
2014-01-02 21:15 keltezéssel, poma írta:
On 02.01.2014 20:36, Steve Clark wrote:
Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as
opposed to being some
nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf means is
"did not finish".
Did Not Fini
Le jeudi 02 janvier 2014 à 16:45 -0500, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> It could be implemented as a plugin and still installed by
> default.
>
>
> It could be but I doubt that is the proposed change here. They just
>
Hi
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Ah, I see it's nit-pick day. :)
>
> I did commit the fix to git. However, rawhide composes based on a tag
> from the rel-eng repo. I didn't move the tag up to the new revision
>
Didn't mean to be nit picking. Just was wondering why the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ScanDeps:
15fe01997c556f36d1a1b22722e4bd79 Module-ScanDeps-1.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Hi
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> I could see a few. having a plugin permit to have it more extensible.
> For example, let's say I want to have a system that act a bit smarter,
> and prevent removing kernel, and several others stuff depending on the
> hostname ( ie, in
Am 03.01.2014 08:17, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 02:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as
>>> opposed to being some nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only
>>> thing I am aware of
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most on Fedora 20:
1. gnome-shell seen 12370 times (23% of all reports)
http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1380731/ RHBZ#995785
http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1380807/ RHBZ#995785
2. gnome-software seen 5545 ti
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Richard Marko wrote:
> In last two weeks these components were crashing the most on Fedora 20:
> 3. kernel seen 4540 times (8% of all reports)
> http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/898437/
> http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1372844/
I
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:54:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.01.2014 08:17, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 02:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Steve Clark wrote:
> >>> Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as
> >>> opposed to being som
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
--- Comment #5 from Neil Darlow ---
ABRT was invoked and reported that Perl had caught a SIGABRT.
This was with 2 threads selected and reducing threads to 1 allows Quick Slice
and Save As... to work correctly.
This is proving to be quite a p
Happy New Year everyone! And also, congratulations on and thank you for a
really excellent Fedora 20 release. I've seen and heard a lot of positive
feedback and I'm quite confident in telling people that this incarnation is
the best Fedora yet.
But, of course, nothing stays still, and there's no b
HI
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> But I also think naming is important, and that gratuitous renaming of
> an important piece of user-visible software functionality that makes
> up part of the sysadmin's user interface should be avoided without
> good reason,
>
My under
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> My understanding is that dnf is only the name of the "experimental fork"
> of yum and the end result will continue to be called yum. Am I wrong about
> that?
>
That was my understand as well (as of about a year ago), but I don't know
if th
Le 03/01/2014 19:14, Matthew Miller a écrit :
Happy New Year everyone! And also, congratulations on and thank you for a
really excellent Fedora 20 release. I've seen and heard a lot of positive
feedback and I'm quite confident in telling people that this incarnation is
the best Fedora yet.
Happ
The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here:
https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/
It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest) and rawhide.
--
Lokesh
pgpN3DQalvGCD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
El Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:46:07 -0500
Lokesh Mandvekar escribió:
> The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available
> here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/
>
> It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest) and rawhide.
As it wasn't created by Release Engineering, and afaik
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:53:19 -0800
> Michael Stahnke wrote:
>
> > What's the process opt-in at this point? I'm a bit unclear. I see that
> > epel-release was built for EPEL7 (and that the git branch is epel7
> > instead of el7).
>
> There's n
On Sex, 2014-01-03 at 16:25 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:46:07 -0500
> Lokesh Mandvekar escribió:
> > The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available
> > here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/
> >
> > It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:38:56PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I can't find any image , we need to login ? to download it ?
$ sudo yum install docker-io
$ sudo docker run fedora cat /etc/fedora-release
(Second step can be not as root if you add yourself to the `docker` group.)
--
Matthew Mille
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:25:30PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available
> > here: https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/
> As it wasn't created by Release Engineering, and afaik was not tested
> by QA. It is a remix and can not be called off
Hi
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> The official (unprefixed) fedora image for docker is now available here:
> https://index.docker.io/_/fedora/
>
> It has fedora 20 (via tags 20, heisenbug and latest) and rawhide.
>
What is the marketing pitch for this? Why should any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/2014 11:14 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Since we can't afford a monthly conference (ha!), I want something that
> feels like it online. A hub for the community, where we have that
> interconnectedness all the time. I think this centers around
23 matches
Mail list logo
