On fim 12.des 2013 20:00, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>On 12/12/2013 06:02 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> >- Review latest WGs planing and PRD state and impacts on Base
>It's the other way around as in the WG's have to be in alignm
On 12/12/2013 09:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:50:31PM +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Now, to figure our how the build chains for these packages look like
i've cobbled together a (really bad) hack using python and
repoclosure that basically takes a set of packages as an inp
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:45:22PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >>>On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibo
Compose started at Fri Dec 13 07:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in Fedora
working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to reduce the
number of self-hosting packages required for Base from currently over
2000 packages.
Just a few (probably s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:05:55 -0600
Dennis Gilmore escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Final RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
>
> ami-3b361952 : us-east-1 image for i386
> ami-1337187
Kevin Kofler writes:
> Simone Caronni wrote:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html
>
> Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation of
> the 2 projects than your Change page. In particular, he claims the community
> version is
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50 +0100,
Vít Ondruch wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
required. This could reveal some BR which are actually not needed
anymore, but are listed amon
On 12/13/2013 12:20 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in Fedora
working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to reduce the
number of self-hosting packages required for Base from currently ove
On 12/13/2013 02:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50 +0100,
Vít Ondruch wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
required. This could reveal some BR which are ac
sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to
have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even
still available and i am too stupid to find them?
the base repo is missing a lot of things like
* htop
* lynis
* rkhunter
* phpMyAdmin
* php-pecl-mailparse
* php-pecl-geoip
* php-pecl-imagic
You can check epel-devel list, we just discussed something there.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
2013/12/13 Reindl Harald
> sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to
> have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even
> still available and i am too stupid to find them?
>
> the base repo is missing a lot of things like
> * htop
> * lynis
> * rkhunter
> * phpMyAdmin
> * php-pecl-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to have EPEL
> pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even still available and i am too
> stupid to find them?
>
> the base repo is missing a lot of things like
Am 13.12.2013 14:52, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
> On 12/13/2013 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to have EPEL
>> pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even still available and i am too
>> stupid to find them?
>
>> the base repo is missing a lot of th
Dne 13.12.2013 14:41, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
On 12/13/2013 12:20 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in Fedora
working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to reduce the
number of self-hostin
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>
> Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2
> builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and
> filelists. :)
Try /usr/bin/rpmdiff first...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Hi,
Is there any netinstall image for this RC1?
2013/12/12 Andre Robatino
> NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
>
> As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1
> (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
> changes, can be foun
should this not be also available as torrent?
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
currently only the Beta
i would like to help with my bandwidth and my beta-tracker is obsolete now
Am 12.12.2013 08:10, schrieb Andre Robatino:
> NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
>
> As per the Fe
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:47:38AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to
> > files in the release tree
> > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-RC1/Images/i386/Fedora-Images-i386-20-AMI
> > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stag
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to
> have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even
> still available and i am too stupid to find them?
It's completely off-topic for this lists, there's an epel-devel list
for EPEL discussi
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:36:37 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> should this not be also available as torrent?
> http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
>
> currently only the Beta
> i would like to help with my bandwidth and my beta-tracker is
> obsolete now
TC (test compose) and RC's (Release Candidates)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:26:41AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> The base end's up being broken compromises between the working
> groups ( in other words keeping things the same as they are now ),
> which is why I designed the FedoraOS ( which is just different
> approach to the layer/rin
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> * It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
> BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
> required. This could reveal some BR which are actually not needed
> anymore, but are listed amo
Am 13.12.2013 16:47, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:36:37 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
>>
>> currently only the Beta
>> i would like to help with my bandwidth
>
> TC (test compose) and RC's (Release Candidates) are not mirrored or
> torrented.
Today we continued the discussion about the BR cleanup work and moved
over to how we could do the same for docs as well (which seemed to
contribute a lot to the BR chain).
Meeting ended Fri Dec 13 16:07:27 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
Minutes:
http:/
Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr).
I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has
one or two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer on the Satellite /
Spacewalk projects and I've been packaging / maintaining koan for over a
year with them, so I figured I could contri
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
600
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
115
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
91
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
600
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
115
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
57
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
On 12/13/2013 12:49 PM, Stephen Herr wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr).
I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has one or
two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer on the Satellite / Spacewalk
projects and I've been packaging / maintaining koan for over a y
Hi, folks. I wanted to draw the attention of anyone who used Fedora 20
pre-release (Alpha, Beta, or TC/RC for Alpha, Beta or Final) to this
issue:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#.2Froot_permissions_incorrect_on_pre-release_installations
Briefly, if you did use F20 pre-release - th
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:45 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2
> builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and
> filelists. :)
That's still not really enough; that metadata doesn't express anything
*close*
Invariably when adding a patch to a spec, often I forget some detail,
whether it be adding the %patchN macro to %prep or `git add`ing the
patch. It would seem I'm not alone, either. A Google search for e.g.
"site:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/ really
apply patch" returns t
Hi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
> To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git
> pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all:
> http://patches.fedorapeople.org/patchcheck.py
>
Would it be possible to hook it up with f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:46:16 -0500
Matthew Miller escribió:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:47:38AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to
> > > files in the release tree
> > > http://dl.fedor
I maintain two package, OpenImageIO and OpenColorIO, which can optionally
depend on each other. During the review process I intentionally decided
that it was more important for OpenImageIO to depend on OpenColorIO as it
uses the latter for color management.
OpenColorIO is not a library, but a bina
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:05:05PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > Note, these are the GA images.
> > Hey Dennis, will the images going to mirrors be these or the ones
> > with the extra RC1.1 dot, like
> > "Fedora-x86_64-20-20131211.1-sda.qcow2"?
> The Images in RC1 and RC1.1 are exactly the sa
37 matches
Mail list logo
