On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> [...] and removes functionality
No it does not.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
For a few last months I've been line after line putting together the
Anaconda Addon Development Guide [1] -- a short and straightforward
guide describing how an addon for the Anaconda installer can be
implemented, tested, deployed and packaged. I believe it is now almost
finished, but it needs revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037518
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20.
Thursday, December 12, 2013 17:00 UTC (12 PM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if t
Compose started at Tue Dec 10 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
> passing
> and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be
> a
> good time to call for testers and collect bug reports and
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-12-10)
Meeting started by bkabrda at 13:02:36 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-12-10/env_and_stacks.2013-12-10-13
drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler
> wrote:
>> [...] and removes functionality
>
> No it does not.
Yes, it does, see my example:
| a printf wrapper for logging which adds a timestamp in front of the
| format string, e.g.
| log("processed %d items", foo);
| which woul
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler
>> wrote:
>>> [...] and removes functionality
>>
>> No it does not.
>
> Yes, it does, see my example:
> | a printf wrapper for logging which adds a timestamp in front of the
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02:15AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> #topic #1211 F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HeadlessJava
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1211
For this feature I want to point out, that there are JVM-based languages with
sw
On 12/10/2013 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler
-Werror=format-security removes the functionality of building format strings
at runtime, and there are legitimate uses for such f
Le 06/12/2013 11:51, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Le 28/11/2013 03:25, Adam Williamson a écrit :
>> Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
>> and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order
>> to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-g
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> printf( ptr );
Aside from everything else, using the printf() family of functions when
you don't want formatted output is bad practice. There's really no
excuse for calling printf(foo); if you don't want formatted output (i.e.
you don't pass a format st
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> Aside from everything else, using the printf() family of functions when
> you don't want formatted output is bad practice. There's really no
> excuse for calling printf(foo); if you don't want formatted output (i.e.
> you don't pass a format string with addit
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 07:12:03AM +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> fre 2013-12-06 klockan 15:06 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce:
> > Additionally, some code (like my package, qpid-cpp) uses code that's
> > generated by another app like Swig. We have no control over what that
> > code is. So enabling th
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:58:21PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:06 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > Additionally, some code (like my package, qpid-cpp) uses code that's
> > generated by another app like Swig. We have no control over what that
> > code is. So enabling thi
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 17:42 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 06/12/2013 11:51, Remi Collet a écrit :
> > Le 28/11/2013 03:25, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> >> Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
> >> and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In o
Le 10/12/2013 18:20, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> It would've worked better if you'd nominated it as one before the
> meeting :/
I have raised the issue on ML Dec 6th.
And bug blocks #980657 (Final 20 freeze exception tracker) since this date.
NB: I just tried to have F20 in a correct state...
> 1. There are legitimate use-cases where GCC's assumption does not hold, .e.g.:
>
> #include
>
> void foo( int a )
> {
> char hello0[] = "hello0";
foo.c line 5: warning: 'const' omitted
> char hello1[] = "hello1";
foo.c line 6: warning: 'const' omitted
>
> char *ptr;
foo.c line 8: warn
On 12/06/2013 08:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
QString line;
line.fill( '-', 60 );
qDebug( line.ascii() );
As you can see, the format string being passed here is provably constant.
So fix the compiler.
This package makes baby seals wish they could be clubbed. Upstream has
killed it. I disavow any knowledge of it.
Retired: R-RScaLAPACK
~tom
==
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> OSAS @ Red Hat
University Outreach || Fedora Special Projects || Fedora Legal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
>> passing
>> and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would
>>
tis 2013-12-10 klockan 12:18 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce:
> > Of all the packages I
> > maintain, only one was affected by this issue. That one was easily
> > solvable by deleting the bundled swig generated code in the sources and
> > have the build regenerate it with a newer swig version that do
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
>> don't
>> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
>> feel
>> free to note them at:
>
> Just a heads-up, christmas holidays are
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:05:34AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > #topic #1185 Enable "-Werror=format-security" by default
> > .fesco 1185
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1185
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1201 is not resolved yet.
After the last meeting the 'meeting' keyword was
Hi all-
I've been using Fedora for quite a few years as my main desktop OS,
and I think it's time I contributed back by writing some packages.
(Also, there are packages I want -- I might as well create them.)
For my day job, I work at a trading company, writing algorithmic
trading software. I da
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2013-12-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Sadly we didn't build an RC yet and we still have proposed blockers to
consider, so please folks, come out and help us review the new crop.
Input
29 matches
Mail list logo
