Compose started at Tue Dec 3 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
To whom it may interest, SWI Prologue, known as `pl' package in Fedora,
has changed license from
(GPLv2+ with exceptions or Artistic 2.0) and (GPLv2+ with exceptions)
and LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and UCD and Public Domain and GPLv3+
to
(GPLv2+ with exceptions or Artistic 2.0) and (GPLv2+ with exceptio
NOTE: The 64-bit LXDE Live is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:11
. Please see the following pages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Final TC4 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-955476fc : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-c95476a0 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
ht
WG meeting will be today at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Next Steps ==
- PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list
(some discussion on pad: http://piratepad.net/PwUiH4MEPR)
== Open Floor ==
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
Dennis Gilmore writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Final TC4 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
>
> ami-955476fc : us-east-1 image for i386
> ami-c95476a0 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
>
The only issue compared to TC3 is one more file with wrong selinux
context (/var/log/cron).
So, for TC4
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Date-Manip:
70ec592364c3f7f5aea26a852f2dc8ed Date-Manip-6.42.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
commit 7baee6e1372cf34738ff2564f8802cb0ffea1245
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Dec 3 16:48:26 2013 +0100
6.42 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> The only issue compared to TC3 is one more file with wrong selinux
> context (/var/log/cron).
> So, for TC4:
> # restorecon -R -v -n -e /proc -e /sys -e /dev -e/run -e/tmp /
> restorecon reset /var/log/cron context
> system_u:obj
Hi,
dnf-0.4.9 is released. There is the notes[1], the blog post[2] and the
update[3].
Cheers!
Ales
[1] http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html#id20
[2] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2013/12/03/dnf-0-4-9-released/
[3] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-0.4.9-1.fc20
--
devel mailing
Hello list.
What is the current status of Crypto Consolidation in Fedora? Is it still
current and is the page up to date [1]?
In CZ.NIC, we are considering a switch of cryptography backend for our
authoritative DNS server Knot DNS. And we take interest in current
tendencies in bleeding edge distr
On Út, 2013-12-03 at 18:46 +0100, Jan Včelák wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> What is the current status of Crypto Consolidation in Fedora? Is it still
> current and is the page up to date [1]?
The page is mostly up to date.
> In CZ.NIC, we are considering a switch of cryptography backend for our
> auth
On 12/03/2013 07:58 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
I'd suggest to follow the "Medium term goals" from the page. That means
to choose the backend from one of the following libraries (in the order
of preference).
1. NSS
2. GNUTLS (with nettle as crypto backend, but nettle never used
di
Hi,
Per the guidelines here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I
have opened this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029728
requesting an update. I have not heard from the package maintainer in three
weeks, so I am formally requesting t
On 03/12/13 19:58, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Út, 2013-12-03 at 18:46 +0100, Jan Včelák wrote:
>> Hello list.
>>
>> What is the current status of Crypto Consolidation in Fedora? Is it still
>> current and is the page up to date [1]?
>
> The page is mostly up to date.
interesting page... under "Packag
Petr Pisar wrote:
> [snip] and GPLv2 and GPLv3+.
Huh? WTF is upstream smoking there?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 15:30 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to finally fix this bug in Fedora:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985610
>
> Basically, our libev package diverges from upstream in two ways:
>
> 1. we install the header files in /usr/include/libe
Hi
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
>
> OMG
> i do not know what to say here
> /usr/lib/event.h
> -1 should -1,000,000,000
>
> :-)
> i need a list of peoples making such uninspired suggestions
>
Even with a smiley, you haven't really added anything useful to the
discuss
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 22:13 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
>
> OMG
> i do not know what to say here
> /usr/lib/event.h
> -1 should -1,000,000,000
>
> :-)
> i need a list
End of August I've opened tickets about duplicate and potentially
conflicting (because if noarch <-> arch differences) %doc files.
The response from packagers has not been brilliant so far.
These are _package bugs_ specific to Fedora, so it's the responsibility
of a Fedora Packager to fix them. It
20 matches
Mail list logo
