This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20131202
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 20 Final status
3. Open f
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #3.5
# Date: 2013-12-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST), or directly after QA meeting
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Yes folks, it's time for more Monday blocker review - Thursday is
Go/No-Go, so it'd be a bit late to go through t
I still can't see any updates in the guideline, what should we do for
this kind of case? Still allow no ldflag macro inserted?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Compose started at Mon Dec 2 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20.
Thursday, December 05, 2013 17:00 UTC (12 PM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if t
On 11/30/2013 09:04 PM, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
Petr Vobornik wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Just write a fontforge or ttx script that flips this bit at rpm build
time, assuming you've done your legal review correctly the bit is in
contradiction with the font license (if the font was no instal
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
4 packages were orphaned
python-tornado [f18,f19] was orphaned by churchyard
Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Florian.
>
> On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 11:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > There seems to be a library for processing kernel monitoring events
> > called "pevent", "libtrace", "traceevent" etc., which might
>
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:05:54PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>> Hi, Florian.
>>
>> On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 11:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > There seems to be a library for processing kernel monitoring events
I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a strange
issue.
Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I tried the offical
build the ppc64 build couldn't find qmake-qt4.
Looking through root.log shows that for some reason qt3-devel was installed
rather than qt-devel.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a strange
> issue.
>
> Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I tried the offical
> build the ppc64 build couldn't find qmake-qt4.
>
> Looking through root.log shows t
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:14:28 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a
> strange issue.
>
> Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I tried the
> offical build the ppc64 build couldn't find qmake-qt4.
>
> Looking through root.log sh
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune <
dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a strange
> > issue.
> >
> > Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I trie
Below are the minutes from today's Blocker Review Meeting. We made it
through all the listed blocker and freeze exception proposals.
The next meeting will be 2013-12-04 at 17:00 UTC.
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F20-blocker-review
===
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:14:28 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a strange
> issue.
>
> Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I tried the offical
> build the ppc64 build couldn't find qmake-qt4.
>
> Looking through root.log sh
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:14:28 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > I'm working on updating the qsstv package for EL6 and ran into a strange
> > issue.
> >
> > Building for x86_64 worked under mock fine, but when I tried the offical
> > build the
Phil Knirsch (pknir...@redhat.com) said:
> Meeting ended Fri Nov 29 16:15:57 2013 UTC. Information about
> MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
> Minutes:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-29/fedora_base_design_working_group.2013-11-29-15.00.html
> Minutes (text):
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:40:15 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > "qt-devel" is also a virtual Provides for qt3-devel,
> > and "qt4-devel" is a virtual Provides for qt-devel-4*,
> > so BR qt4-devel or BR qt-devel >= 1:4
>
>
> Yup, using qt4-devel got it... It gets a little confusing when qt-devel on
>
Hi all,
Once again, FOSDEM will have a distributions developer room on 1 & 2
February 2014. We'd like to invite submissions of talks, Birds of a
Feather (BoF) sessions, or round-table discussions from any interested
representatives of Linux distributions or individuals who have a topic
of interest
19 matches
Mail list logo
