Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:20:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something like > > > > > > add remote git t

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On 11/18/2013 01:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other branches as other changes permit. - This run was done on a Fedora 20 instance, so hopefully many of the false positiv

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

2013/11/20 Karel Zak : > All such information belong to spec file :-) > > Fedora-SCM: > Upstream-SCM: > Exploded-tree-SCM: > > for example upstream SCM URL is already missing in our spec files, > it's more important information than URL to tarball. Love this idea but there is a problem - RP

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On 20/11/13 08:58, "Germán A. Racca" wrote: What should I do with this [*]? Report upstream? I can successfully download the tarball from Firefox, but using spectool gives that error. You must have added the CAcert root certificate to Firefox then, because that URL redirects to https://www.pe

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:36:54PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > One note though, I think that in the past one of the discussion points we've > foundered on is whether we want to be mirroring upstream's git repo or > (approximately) upstream's releases. I think that's probably where we'd > need

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote: > > What should I do with this [*]? Report upstream? > I can successfully download the tarball from Firefox, but using spectool > gives that error. > [*] > curl: (60) Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognized. > More details here: http:/

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:36:54PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Alek Paunov wrote: > > > On 19.11.2013 16:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > >On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +000

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:58:00AM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:20:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > We have to learn fedpkg t

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

Hi, For github-hosted upstreams, you can suffix some URLs with '.diff' or '.patch'. I have used it for vcsh [1] (which btw is a tool I'd recommend to anyone who keeps dotfiles in sync on several machines). I did that on a pull request, but you can also do that on a commit (for cherry-picking) [2]

Re: Packaging changes for libev in Rawhide

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:24:34 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > The current packaging approach is circumventing the packaging policies: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > > > perl-EV does not use the system libev. No real "unbundling" has been > > achieved by repl

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

Le Mar 19 novembre 2013 09:35, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit : > You can use following Oracle article as a starting point[1]. But maybe > OpenJDK > maintainers can provide better alternative. Generally though there are > *very* > few packages in Fedora that would require full java. > > > [1] http:

F-20 Branched report: 20131120 changes

Compose started at Wed Nov 20 09:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client [blueman] blueman-1.23-7

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On 11/20/2013 07:50 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote: What should I do with this [*]? Report upstream? I can successfully download the tarball from Firefox, but using spectool gives that error. [*] curl: (60) Peer's Certificate issuer is not rec

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

Quoting Reindl Harald (2013-11-19 23:38:21) > > > Am 19.11.2013 20:29, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On 11/19/2013 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >>> what about having a "java-1.7.0-openjdk" meta-package obsoleting > >>> the

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

Le Mer 20 novembre 2013 15:04, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit : > Can we actually list good reasons to have a metapackage or x11 subpackage > that > would outweight the inevitable disadvantages? If you *really* feel I > misunderstood these two ideas we can start an etherpad or something so we > can

ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

Hello all, I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64 %{arm}", which should exclude arm* and ppc* (both not supported by upstream). When trying to build F20, I got the following error: Building spring-

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-11-20)

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/19/2013 02:47 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Nov 19, 2013 12:55 PM, "Stephen Gallagher" > > wrote: >>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. > First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64 > %{arm}", which should exclude arm* and ppc* (both not supported by > upstream). > >

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

Adding files must be accomplished by git add, or fedpkg won't include it due to a bug in GitPython. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [Fedora QA] #436: SSH access to systems in Beaker lab

#436: SSH access to systems in Beaker lab ---+ Reporter: atodorov | Owner: tflink Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug

[perl-Sub-Install] Update BRs

commit b5e3e3af1ba9f35f5dc363393265a02bddc0fecf Author: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed Nov 20 16:41:02 2013 +0100 Update BRs perl-Sub-Install.spec | 25 +++-- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Sub-Install.spec b/perl-Sub-Install.spe

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:54:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > - This run was done on a Fedora 20 instance, so hopefully many of the > false positives due to old tools from the last run are gone. Those are still false positives: > raorn:BADSOURCE:wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz:wmMatrix > raorn:B

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:23:33 +0200 Gilboa Davara wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. > First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64 > %{arm}", which should exclude arm* and ppc* (both not supported by > upstream).

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > I think I'll make spectool tell curl not to verify SSL certs by default in > the next release. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/rpmdevtools.git/commit/?id=363b0d5bbd92e2cac2a9ba632af54e303ffc491d -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedora

Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

Hi, We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" compilation flag for all packages in Fedora. Once this flag is enabled, GCC will refuse to compile code that could be vulnerable to a string format security flaw. For more details, please see https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticke

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > Currently, around 400 packages FTBFS if this flag is enabled. I am all > set to start filing the bugs (once given the green signal). In addition, > I am willing to help in patching these packages. I believe that this > work is important and wi

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

> > And the very first package I maintain that appears on that list, abe, > is an interesting one. The game has an internal function, > path_sprintf(), which is static in Game.c. All callers of that > function are visible in the same file, and all pass constant strings > into the function, which

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 21:27:39 +0530 Dhiru Kholia wrote: > Hi, > > We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" > compilation flag for all packages in Fedora. > > Once this flag is enabled, GCC will refuse to compile code that could > be vulnerable to a string format security

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

Quoting Nicolas Mailhot (2013-11-20 16:20:34) > > Le Mer 20 novembre 2013 15:04, Stanislav Ochotnicky a écrit : > > > Can we actually list good reasons to have a metapackage or x11 subpackage > > that > > would outweight the inevitable disadvantages? If you *really* feel I > > misunderstood these

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 20 November 2013 17:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > First... I'd suggest posting the list of packages and give maintainers > a week or two to just fix them. Then before filing anything you can run > a quick check to see which packages are still needing fixing. > Yes please, sometimes the automated b

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:50:17AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > I think I'll make spectool tell curl not to verify SSL certs by > default in the next release. If you want it already now for your local > spectool, do for example this: "echo --insecure >> > /etc/rpmdevtools/curlrc" IMHO the default

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:22 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > which would expand to something like: > > git init > git config user.email "%{name}-ow...@fedoraproject.org" > git config user.name "%{name}" > git add . > git commit -a -q -m "%{version} baseline" > git am %{patches} Tri

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 11/20/13 at 09:27pm, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" > compilation flag for all packages in Fedora. > > Currently, around 400 packages FTBFS if this flag is enabled. A list of packages which FTBFS is available at, http://people.fedoraproje

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 09:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > > Currently, around 400 packages FTBFS if this flag is enabled. I am all > > set to start filing the bugs (once given the green signal). In addition, > > I am willing to help in patching

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:04:16PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > So which one of them would "Provides: java"? I'll give you several variants: > > headless provides java: > - breaks compatibility expectations of older/3rd party RPMs > - we suddenly switch every Java package in Fed

Re: [Fedora QA] #435: bugzilla sync operations are not using the correct config items

#435: bugzilla sync operations are not using the correct config items ---+ Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink Type: defect| Status: closed Priority: critical | Mile

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 11/20/2013 10:51 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > On 11/20/13 at 09:27pm, Dhiru Kholia wrote: >> We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" >> compilation flag for all packages in Fedora. >> >> Currently, around 400 packages FTBFS if this flag is enabled. > > A list of packages w

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. >> First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64 >> %{arm}", which should exc

Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

On 20.11.2013 11:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:36:54PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: One note though, I think that in the past one of the discussion points we've foundered on is whether we want to be mirroring upstream's git repo or (approximately) upstream's releases.

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:23:33 +0200 > Gilboa Davara wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring. >> First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64 >> %{arm}", which should

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 577 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 91 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5 67 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 577 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 91 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6 52 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

I start to think this conversation goes nowhere. The whole split is superficial and most java developers are used to get full jvm if they require java. This would probably change with Java 8 introducing Profiles [1]. And any proper packaging should be modeled after this one. Inventing even more n

[perl-Tree-Simple] Upstream update.

commit aaea3f3a1151f27b2ad363e2e5b5be02b3c66b59 Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Wed Nov 20 18:41:24 2013 +0100 Upstream update. - BR: perl(Test::Version). .gitignore|2 +- perl-Tree-Simple.spec |7 ++- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 inser

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:21:10PM +0530, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > On 11/20/13 at 09:27pm, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > > We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" > > compilation flag for all packages in Fedora. > > > > Currently, around 400 packages FTBFS if this flag is enabled. >

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #434 admin-serv logs filling with "admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve "

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/434/0001-Ticket-434-admin-serv-logs-filling-with-admserv_host.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47478 No groups file? error restarting Admin server

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47478/0001-Ticket-47478-No-groups-file-error-restarting-Admin-s.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-11-20)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2013 12:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > h

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 11/20/2013 11:13 AM, Jerry James wrote: path_sprintf(), which is static in Game.c. All callers of that function are visible in the same file, and all pass constant strings into the function, which passes those constant strings to sprintf(). The function's purpose is to produce a pathname for

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-21 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2013-11-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2013-11-21 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST 2013-11-21 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST 2013-11-21 1

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 11/20/13 at 11:16am, David Smith wrote: > > On 11/20/13 at 09:27pm, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > > A list of packages which FTBFS is available at, > > > > http://people.fedoraproject.org/~halfie/rebuild-logs.txt > > Looking at the list, I see several (~17) packages with errors of the form: > > error: -

[perl-Tree-Simple/f20] Upstream update.

Summary of changes: aaea3f3... Upstream update. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:27:38PM -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > I start to think this conversation goes nowhere. The whole split is > superficial and most java developers are used to get full jvm if they > require java. This would probably change with Java 8 introducing Profiles > [1]. And

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

- Original Message - > From: "Toshio Kuratomi" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:53:15 PM > Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:27:38PM -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > I start to

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

On 20/11/13 18:53, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:27:38PM -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: I start to think this conversation goes nowhere. The whole split is superficial and most java developers are used to get full jvm if they require java. This would probably change with

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > We were speaking about giving more power to SIGs related to > discussion about Fedora.next. This can be a good start. Stano and > Aleksandar are working on Java maintenance a lot, Java SIG members > are speaking together, so I

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

- Original Message - > From: "Toshio Kuratomi" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:23:29 PM > Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > > > We were

Bundled md5 in OCaml

See: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/byterun/md5.c#L78 (1) In terms of the bundled(md5-$IMPLEMENTATION), which $IMPLEMENTATION is this? (2) Ideally I would like to replace this with a call to a library (in Fedora, I don't think this would be accepted upstream). But which library shoul

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-11-20)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-11-20) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:59:37 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-20/fesco.2

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 23:15 +0530, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > On 11/20/13 at 11:16am, David Smith wrote: > > > On 11/20/13 at 09:27pm, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > > > A list of packages which FTBFS is available at, > > > > > > http://people.fedoraproject.org/~halfie/rebuild-logs.txt > > > > Looking at the lis

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On 11/20/2013 11:13 AM, Jerry James wrote: And the very first package I maintain that appears on that list, abe, is an interesting one. The game has an internal function, path_sprintf(), which is static in Game.c. All callers of that function are visible in the same file, and all pass constant

Re: Source file audit - 2013-11-17

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:50:17AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> I think I'll make spectool tell curl not to verify SSL certs by >> default in the next release. If you want it already now for your local >> spectool, do for example this: "echo -

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:39:48PM -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > The thing is this is pointless. If the people that would do most of this > auditing (Java SIG) do not agree with such scenario the result would be > that old Require:java will be kept whenever full java jvm is used as this >

AutoQA and Beaker Downtime Today

Apologies for the late notice, I had the wrong date in my head for this. With the Fedora Infrastructure outage today, I'm going to take the opportunity to update and reboot all the AutoQA and Beaker infrastructure. AutoQA and Beaker will be mostly down for about 3 hours from 22:00 UTC. I'll send

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java

- Original Message - > From: "Toshio Kuratomi" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:46:32 PM > Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:39:48PM -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > The

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

NOTE: The 64-bit LXDE Live is over its size limit. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:6 . Please see the following pages f

Fedora 20 TC2 AMIs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Final TC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at ami-3392b55a : us-east-1 image for i386 ami-f794b39e : us-east-1 image for x86_64 additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files in the release tree ht

Re: Enabling "-Werror=format-security" by default

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Dhiru Kholia wrote: Hi, We are working on a proposal to enable "-Werror=format-security" compilation flag for all packages in Fedora. Once this flag is enabled, GCC will refuse to compile code that could be vulnerable to a string format security flaw. For more details, plea