Il 07/11/2013 08:27, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:38:38 +
wrote:
Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55)
Hi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Faux wrote:
Is it correct that the NetBeans IDE is currently not packed for
Fedora? I checked the "netbeans"
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 6 November 2013 10:41, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > # rpm -qf /usr/share/app-info/xmls/fedora-20.xml.gz
> > gnome-software-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
> > does.
>
> It's AppStream metadata.
Whould it not be a good idea to have it in a sepa
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Format:
e69875098e9c2777d8d196d95f96b62e HTML-Format-2.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
commit 43154eca459f6d905082a170420fdea0377f53de
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Nov 7 09:37:00 2013 +0100
Upstream update.
- Drop perl-HTML-Format-2.10.diff.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-HTML-Format-2.10.diff | 12
perl-HTML-Format.spec | 14 +
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
>> The definition given by Frank Murphy is totally different and doesn't
>> align with above. Above also doesn't relate to developers.
>
> These align a lot with what I wrote though. :-)
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/power
Summary of changes:
43154ec... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:11:37 +0100
"punto...@libero.it" wrote:
> Il 07/11/2013 08:27, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:38:38 +
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55)
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Faux wrote:
>
Il 07/11/2013 09:47, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:11:37 +0100
"punto...@libero.it" wrote:
Il 07/11/2013 08:27, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:38:38 +
wrote:
Quoting Rahul Sundaram (2013-11-05 17:46:55)
Hi
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Fau
On 7 Nov 2013 03:05, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > What you say makes some sense. It also makes me very tired thinking
> > about the threads coming when the details start getting presented by
> > the WGs :). I guess that's what we've signed up for though.
>
> Well yes, each tim
On 7 Nov 2013 03:20, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:00:16AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> > Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on
> >> > the various bundling techniques that were explored an
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:24:20 -0400
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
Will the other DE's still exist after "workstation"
Will a dev be able to use Xfce, Lxde as graphical choice.
What would encourage say an xubuntu dev //* devs are still users */
working on foo, to switch to "Fedora Wor
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the distribution
> > is based upon systemd.
>
> That means it will exclude the most popular distribution out there.
I fail to see the point of discussing
Summary of changes:
60054ed... Update to 0.0941 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 04:01:09AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Well yes, each time you try to force a change through which actually makes
> things worse, there WILL be resistance. In fact, this is already what is
> happening in this thread, the "app" proposal coming from (parts of) the
> Workst
The lightweight tag 'perl-Archive-Any-0.0941-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
60054ed... Update to 0.0941
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-d
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:50:59AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:00:16AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> > Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on
> >> > the various bundling techniques that
The lightweight tag 'perl-Archive-Any-0.0941-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
60054ed... Update to 0.0941
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-d
2013/11/7 Olav Vitters
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
> distribution
> > > is based upon systemd.
> >
> > That means it will exclude the most popular distribution out there.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:17:28 +0100
Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
> > > distribution is based upon systemd.
> >
> > That means it will exclude the most po
Kevin,
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 04:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So where's the strawman?
please stop with this.
Simo wrote a rather long email post and argued he's view on users'
freedom and all you did in reply was to nitpick on a footnote.
Or in Simo's words again:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 23:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:40:46 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 02.11.2013 18:18, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> %define do_build() \
> >> mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
> >> (cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
> >> %{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{mingw%{1}_prefix}'
> >> 'TARGET=q
Summary of changes:
5535550... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027763
Bug ID: 1027763
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.82 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXSLT
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Beta.
This is the third attempt to release Fedora 20 Beta. Currently, RC5 is
under validation, please help if you can [1]. Two new blocker bugs are
proposed.
Thur
On 11/06/2013 11:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Has this "sanboxed-bundled-from-upstream" proposal been discussed with
other distributions? If the final result is that the "Universal Linux
Package" only works in Fedora we are not gaini
- Original Message -
> On 11/06/2013 11:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> >> Has this "sanboxed-bundled-from-upstream" proposal been discussed with
> >> other distributions? If the final result is that the "Universal Linux
> >>
= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3.4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3.4
Change owner(s): Slavek Kabrda
Update the Python 3 stack in Fedora from Python 3.3 to Python 3.4.
== Detailed description ==
Python 3.4 adds numerous features and optimizations. See the upstream notes
Compose started at Thu Nov 7 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
On 11/06/2013 08:52 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Again: don't stop the solution short based on what the current code
happens to implement.
If we're building the bundles - and there's reasons we would want to -
then we know the patches we need to apply.
Despite significant efforts, we still have so
Dear developers and Fedora contributors,
let me introduce Copr:
http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
Copr is a build system for third party repositories. It is intended for:
* upstream teams - to make nightly and test builds
* layered applications - if you build on top of Fedora, but you a
Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 21:39, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:30:37 -0800,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>FWIW the ship has probably sailed now, but I really don't think it'd be
>>much of a problem to have 3.12 in F20 at release time. It's what I've
>>been running on my F
On 6 November 2013 23:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> $ file screenshot-soundconverter.png
> screenshot-soundconverter.png: PNG image data, 502 x 534, 8-bit/color RGBA,
> non-interlaced
> ScreenshotSizeWidthMin=624
> ScreenshotSizeHeightMin=351
503 is smaller than 624 and the screenshot is the wro
On 7 November 2013 08:34, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> Whould it not be a good idea to have it in a separate package, such kind of
> metadata should not be included with the application package IMHO
The plan is to ship this with the other metadata (and downloaded by
dnf/yum) long term, but at the momen
On 07.11.2013 12:38, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:40:46 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 02.11.2013 18:18, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hi,
Sandro Mani wrote:
%define do_build() \
mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
(cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
%{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{mingw%{1}_prefix}'
Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 19:24, Josh Boyer a écrit :
> I'm just having trouble wrapping my head around the intense focus on a
> new app packaging technology when the entire distro is making massive
> changes to how it's produced.
Because all distributions can and do ship the same software and the
This review differs from previous with:
* skip verbose option (use of log.level).
* use glob.glob to retrieve files matching rather that os.walk
* fix a bug in instanceBackupFS that did not return an already
existing backup
* add two functions to handle instance backup: clearInstanceBackup
Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 11:17, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Olav Vitters wrote:
>> > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
>> distribution
>> > is based upon systemd.
>>
>> That means it will exclude the most popular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/2013 10:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 01:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Simo Sorce wrote:
* and *ideally* I mean SELinux sanbdboxed with specific APIs that
must be used to interact with
= Proposed Self Contained Change: OpenCL =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenCL
Change Owner(s): Fabian Deutsch
This change will bring basic OpenCL support to Fedora to support the
development of OpenCL enabled software and the development of OpenCL
implementations itself. The change
Richard Hughes wrote:
It's not mandatory, but highly reccomended. See
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/#screenshots for
details.
A little off-topic but I was wondering:
The spec states "Screenshots should be taken with US English as the
display language.".
However the spec also
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 13:54 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dear developers and Fedora contributors,
>
> let me introduce Copr:
>
> http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
>
> Copr is a build system for third party repositories. It is intended for:
> * upstream teams - to make nightly and test
Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 20:52, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> Don't throw your hands up in resignation. Write code. Fix problems.
Isn't that exactly what this proposal does?
People claim packaging process is broken and needs to be replaced. But
they've not even identified the problem parts, nor trie
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.
perl-SOAP-Lite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On i386:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On armhfp:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requi
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 14:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 20:52, Adam Jackson a écrit :
>
> > Don't throw your hands up in resignation. Write code. Fix problems.
>
> Isn't that exactly what this proposal does?
>
> People claim packaging process is broken and needs to b
Le 07/11/2013 13:54, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
> Dear developers and Fedora contributors,
>
> let me introduce Copr:
>
> http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
Very nice tool (from a Copr tester)
Thanks a lot.
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 7 November 2013 13:36, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> A little off-topic but I was wondering:
> The spec states "Screenshots should be taken with US English as the display
> language.".
You can actually localize the screenshots if you want; I don't know of
any project that wants to do that yet.
> Ho
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:33:57AM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> 2013/11/7 Olav Vitters
>
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
> > distribution
> > > > is based upon systemd
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> I fail to see the point of discussing non-GNOME-specific problems on a
> GNOME development list. A bit more logical to include people who actually
> work on non-GNOME software and don't want to discuss non-GNOME app
> distribution o
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:45:29AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:17:28 +0100
> Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
> > > > distrib
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 11:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> >>Has this "sanboxed-bundled-from-upstream" proposal been discussed with
> >>other distributions? If the final result i
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 19:24, Josh Boyer a écrit :
>
>> I'm just having trouble wrapping my head around the intense focus on a
>> new app packaging technology when the entire distro is making massive
>> changes to how it's produced.
>
> Be
Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 14:46, Simo Sorce a écrit :
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 14:41 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 20:52, Adam Jackson a écrit :
>>
>> > Don't throw your hands up in resignation. Write code. Fix problems.
>>
>> Isn't that exactly what this proposal does?
>>
Hi,
my little utility for easier karma submitting into bodhi is looking for sponsor.
Package review [1] is in progress right now.
I would really appreciate any comments and sponsoring.
Thank you
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Branislav Blaškovič
www.blaskovic.sk
--
d
Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 14:57, Josh Boyer a écrit :
> And yet, now we have Coprs. Which lets people easily upload
> unreviewed, possibly bundled application SRPMs for easy distribution
> outside of the main Fedora repos. Everyone seems to think Coprs are
> awesome, but they can be used for the s
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dear developers and Fedora contributors,
>
> let me introduce Copr:
>
> http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
>
> Copr is a build system for third party repositories. It is intended for:
> * upstream teams - to make nightly and test build
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 14:57, Josh Boyer a écrit :
>
>> And yet, now we have Coprs. Which lets people easily upload
>> unreviewed, possibly bundled application SRPMs for easy distribution
>> outside of the main Fedora repos. Everyone see
Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 15:19, Josh Boyer a écrit :
> So if we call containerized apps "Appers" and host it somewhere on
> Fedora infrastructure and tell people about it, you'd be totally OK
> with that?
I think that would remove a lot of the emotion in this thread.
> People seem to already be
Peter Robinson wrote:
I don't see many people forcing things through, I believe that the vast majority
of contributors either like the change or aren't bothered by it. There's
certainly no proof that it'll make anything worse. That doesn't mean its going
to be perfect or without teething problems
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Just because you can't see a way to fix it doesn't mean its either
> unfixable or that there aren't people willing to step up to do so.
It's not that I can't see a way to fix it, it's that I can see that there is
no way! The whole system relies on bundling, so it is provab
Hi Frank,
They will, although in some sense I am the wrong person to ask this question as
it
will be up to the people developing and packaging these DE's just like it is
now.
The difference from today here though will be that there will be some
requirements for being available
for the workstati
Peter Robinson wrote:
> I don't see many people forcing things through, I believe that the vast
> majority of contributors either like the change or aren't bothered by it.
Ah, the "silent majority" hypothesis, always a fun argument to bring (with
no evidence whatsoever) when one is clearly losing
Josh Boyer wrote:
Everyone seems to think Coprs are
awesome, but they can be used for the same things you deride
containerized apps for.
Please don't count me as "everyone."
How is Coprs a benefit?
-Allows easy Fedora fragmentation. Why bother with package reviews ever again?
Were Ubuntu's PP
Hi
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I don't see many people forcing things through, I believe that the vast
> > majority of contributors either like the change or aren't bothered by it.
>
> Ah, the "silent majority" hypothesis, always a fun argume
On Thu, 07.11.13 03:53, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the distribution
> > is based upon systemd.
>
> That means it will exclude the most popular distribution out there.
If you are referring to Ubunt
Hi
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>
> I can only react to what has been published, which so far is "we'll do
> better because you suck"
>
Where has anyone said that?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47521
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47521/0001-Ticket-47521-Complex-filter-in-a-search-request-doen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Sam,
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:23:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Kottler
To: EPEL Development List
Subject: Re: EPEL Retire from maintainership duties
- Original Message -
I'll take over nagios-plugins, nagios-plugins-check_sip, and nrpe.
Can you orphan those packages so I can be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
651705dd3754fe2574843da5e67f2c52 Fedora-Rebuild-v0.10.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
commit 3c67235b6d5fa21b80b62062e5c43a947d75bfa3
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Nov 7 16:46:17 2013 +0100
0.10.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec | 32
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13
Summary of changes:
3c67235... 0.10.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
commit 347b470af7ae759736263592c0e4dba9ae67c7ce
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Nov 7 16:46:17 2013 +0100
0.10.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec | 32
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13
commit 9476c47d0a44c0123fb8246f2ff406b0dc07fffa
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Nov 7 16:46:17 2013 +0100
0.10.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec | 32
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13
Hello,
I have recently joined the Red Hat Security Technologies Team,
and will help co-maintain the gnutls and nettle packages.
My primary area of focus is security and cryptography and I'm
working on few such projects (e.g. gnutls).
I'd also like to bring in ocserv [0], an SSL VPN server. I hop
Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:33:57AM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>> 2013/11/7 Olav Vitters
>>
>> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > > Olav Vitters wrote:
>> > > > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
>> > distribution
==
#fedora-meeting: fesco
==
Meeting started by abadger1999 at 18:02:39 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-06/fedora-meeting.2013-11-06-18.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:45:13 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" wrote:
...snip...
>
> It's not blinders it's the natural reaction of people to tactless
> pronouncements and dismissals. I do wish the people complaining about
> this list focused more on technical aspects and less on hype or
> we-ll-decide-som
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:06:43 -0600
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Everyone seems to think Coprs are
> > awesome, but they can be used for the same things you deride
> > containerized apps for.
>
> Please don't count me as "everyone."
>
> How is Coprs a benefit?
> -Allows eas
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> - [Florian Weimer wrote:] -
>> "Wayland" and "systemd" strongly suggest no Ubuntu interoperability
>> whatsoever. Shouldn't this be a top priority for bundled applications?
>
> If we get any traction on this, their customers/users will ask them for it
> themselves
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> (My guess: Canonical will come up with their own Ubuntu App model requiring
> Ubuntu technologies
If you had read Lennart's previous reply to this thread, you'd be
aware that they already did.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 11/07/2013 02:41 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 6 novembre 2013 20:52, Adam Jackson a écrit :
Don't throw your hands up in resignation. Write code. Fix problems.
Isn't that exactly what this proposal does?
People claim packaging process is broken and needs to be replaced.
Who? I'd agr
Josh Boyer wrote:
> So if we call containerized apps "Appers"
The name "Apper" is already taken!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Is / was a rather political decision to make BitchX unavailable through
this app-market / Software GUI thing? Since having to yum install it, I am
beginning to have a negative feeling toward the app market idea; the
thought being: what else is being left out?
Regards,
Richard
--
devel mailing lis
It's only for GUI applications, which BitchX isn't, and if it has
become a GUI application in the ten years since I last looked at it,
it's probably lacking AppData files.
- Original Message -
> Is / was a rather political decision to make BitchX unavailable through
> this app-market / Sof
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application level
and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is an
application
is by looking for a .desktop file. So in theory you could put a bitchx.desktop
file into the bitchx package and it would app
Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 16:29, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I can only react to what has been published, which so far is "we'll do
>> better because you suck"
>>
>
> Where has anyone said that?
For example:
> You're proposin
Hi
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> Hi,
> The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
> level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something
> is an application
> is by looking for a .desktop file. So in theory you
Hi
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > You're proposing a continuation of the adolescent state of Linux on the
> > Desktop with its barriers to growing the market. Yes, let's build
> > artificial walls keeping out new users and developers who don't agree
> > with the ex
https://fedorahosted.org/389//ticket/47541
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47541/0001-Ticket-47541-Replication-of-the-schema-may-overwrite.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Perhaps instead of ignoring them entirely, you can just sort the results or
> having
> a secondary view "Click here for command line applications that match your
> search
> results" etc can be considered.
I guess the main obstacle here is
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
>> level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something
>> is an
Hi
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Florian Müllner wrote:
>
> I guess the main obstacle here is that there isn't really a good
> criterion which is as clear-cut as "installs a (non-NoDisplay)
> .desktop file" => "this is a user-visible gui application" for gui
> applications - mutt certainly is
Hi Sandro,
On 07.11.2013 15:10, Sandro Mani wrote:
Uhm, how can one this be done? Shell variables are substituted after
macro expansion, so i.e.
function do_build {
arch=$1
qt_version=$2
%{mingw${arch}_qmake_${qt_version}}
}
would hardly work? Or are you suggesting passing the entire macros as
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 07.11.13 03:53, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
>
>> Olav Vitters wrote:
>> > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the distribution
>> > is based upon systemd.
>>
>> That means it will exclude the m
On 11/05/2013 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:32 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 15:23 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 14:22
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
> > I guess the main obstacle here is that there isn't really a good
> > criterion which is as clear-cut as "installs a (non-NoDisplay)
> > .desktop file" => "this is a user-visible gui application" for gui
> > applications - mutt certainly is a user appli
Well the installer is work in progress and there are a lot of features missing
still, and
there are still questions that we need to figure out the answer to in terms of
installing various things.
We are trying to nail down the core design first before adding support for
'everything',
but there
Richard Vickery (richard.vicker...@gmail.com) said:
> A thought as we move into the future: if we continue with the installer,
> end users may one day forget about the yum command and all the awesome
> packages out there; they may forget about the command line altogether.
We've been shipping a gr
At the Fedora 20 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 20 Beta by Fedora QA and Fedora
Development (with silent approval from me ;-).
Fedora 20 Beta will be publicly available on Tuesday, November 12,
2013.
!!!Schedule adjustment!!!
Due to possible collisi
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Like repos.fedorapeople.org ?
I don't have a beef with r.f.o. They're no different from hosting a repo on a
personal server. The top of the root page even contains a disclaimer.
How on earth do you get to 'does away with them' ?
It's a Fedora infrastructure server build
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
