On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:51:48PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > And other packages wanting to play video or do WebRTC would start to do
> > the same thing? I really can't see that happening. If at all, it
> > probably would be a Firefox-onl
Le mardi 05 novembre 2013 à 00:05 +0100, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> the real problem Fedora has that there is nobody with the power to make
> finally decisions and in doubt everybody can do anything and until the
> damage is not done things which are not broken are happily fixed
If there was such
Michael Scherer wrote:
> I was giving a talk at pycon.fr last week, and spend the 3 days
> discussing with people. Most people I discussed with ( coders and
> sysadmins alike ) were fully ok with using pip install, much to my
> dismay as a Fedora member.
But those are not end users at all.
To the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 04:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Sure, we probably would end up reducing the number of
>> applications available in the standard yum repos. I'm not as
>> convinced as you are that this is a bad thing. Right now,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 05:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Did you read this link? It talks about exactly what you are
>> doing: asserting that the world must either be "distro-package
>> only" or "absolute chaos". Josh's perspective is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 05:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> That's really not true any more in a world built on top of Ruby,
>> Django, Node.js...
>>
>> In most cases, the people using these technologies don't use the
>> distribution p
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> mån 2013-11-04 klockan 14:58 -0500 skrev Josh Boyer:
>
>> For a large number of upstream projects, they don't care at all about
>> being in a distro. They just focus on their project and someone else
>> integrates it into the distro. Contai
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:29:02PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 15:21:56 -0600,
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 13:29 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>I have asked on the advisory-board list about getting an official
> >>Fedora
> >>position on Open
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 20:15, Josh Boyer a écrit :
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>> wrote:
And, by the way, we've been supporting this kind of model with pip
and gem already, so I really don't get why all
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
>>
>> Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 20:15, Josh Boyer a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>>> wrote:
> And, by the way, we've been supporting this kind of model w
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Łukasz Trąbiński wrote:
> Hi
>
> Where i can find old kernels from fc19 updates?
>
> Last 5-6 kernels are totally unstable and unusable.
> For example, when i boot machines with many ethernet devices I got random
> number ethX. Once eth0 is eth0, after reboot eth0
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I don't think we'd really be correct in blocking the release for such
> > issues - especially not Beta. We used to have 'polish' criteria for
> > Final which at least required the icons used in the system menus - i.
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 04:37 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 01:07:15 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > generate the SRPM and do 'koji build --scratch fXX blah.src.rpm' , where
>
> You would have to rpmbuild -bs *.spec first to get blash.src.rpm.
Yes. That's what 'generate the S
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 09:36 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:26:47 -0400
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:47:36PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > Just so its clear, I think I'm the only other person who works full
> > > time on Fedora at Red Hat, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/05/2013 07:15 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:43:32 +1000 Nick Coghlan
> wrote:
>
> On 11/01/2013 05:23 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
I'm fine with either direction for now. My hesitation on
getting started with 1) is that having
On Nov 4, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:46:17PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
>>> I have a system that corrupts the backup GPT on every reboot.
>>
>> Certain RAID implementations write metadata at the e
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 21:02 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
> > Again those are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You can have sandboxed *and*
> > rpm packaged apps at the same time.
>
> the most imporant word in your answer is *CAN*
>
> but you will not, nobody will
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > I don't think we'd really be correct in blocking the release for such
>> > issues - especially not Beta. We used to have 'polish' criteria for
>> > Final w
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
