Welcome back! :)
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Hi Fedora folks,
>
> Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project
> Leader at Red Hat. If you don't, then salutations, and please feel
> free to check out my Fedora wiki page[1] for my background.
On 11/01/2013 04:58 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:19 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Having as the only GUI package management application on your spin one
that
does not even offer all packages is very broken.
It isn't a *package* management application. It's an *application*
manag
Well,
congratulations and welcome back aboard, good to see you around :)
And also good luck to Spot at his new position.
Best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Censorship? I think we have no reason to change the package name
> because of some governments‘ being evil.
Well there are different ways to solve it then to rename the package.
Having the user use a vpn, ssh tunnel or a proxy is one thing
- Original Message -
> Hi Fedora folks,
>
> Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project
> Leader at Red Hat. If you don't, then salutations, and please feel
> free to check out my Fedora wiki page[1] for my background. :-)
>
> As of next Monday, I'll be the repor
On 11/01/2013 12:38 AM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
Proxies not banned.
But can be.
Renaming packages are non-trivial packages which can take full several days of
work.
And if your goverment decide to add 'proxies' to list (which is 5 second work)
all this work will be vanished.
--
Miroslav Suchy,
On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
>>> On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas:
> Some kind of reference for the bad in having a well-known, hidden
>
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas:
>> Some ki
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 08:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Why would this be useful? Just to be "fashionable"?
No. If you haven't been following the design of gnome-software, the
intent is to make it easier for users to install applications that they
want, without having to dig up what package nam
Am 01.11.2013 10:38, schrieb drago01:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>>> On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
> On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 30.10.20
On 11/01/2013 10:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 10:38, schrieb drago01:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl
2013/11/1 Reindl Harald :
>> The attacker needs to be able to write to your home directory to take
>> advantage of it.
>> And if he can do that (you lost) he has numerous other ways of doing it
>
> so the people decided not put the current directory in the
> PATH on Unix *for security reasons* deca
Am 01.11.2013 11:08, schrieb Petr Viktorin:
> On 11/01/2013 10:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 01.11.2013 10:38, schrieb drago01:
>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 3
On 2013-11-01 11:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
[cut ]
on multi-user systems it is *intentional* that the user does *not* install
software at it's own and if this should be the case the admin *one time*
will add a directory to PATH and say "there you go"
[cut]
Not necessarily (or even most often) tru
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 01.11.2013 10:38, schrieb drago01:
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
>
On 1 November 2013 06:51, Pete Travis wrote:
> Hmm... It sounds like yumex would be much more discoverable if it included
> an appdata file :)
Agreed. At the moment applications without an AppData file are shown
below applications with AppData in the search results. See
http://alt.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct, 2013 at 19:29:25 GMT, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> What about using a custom Google search engine?
>>
>> https://www.google.com/cse/
>
> Google is having more and more privacy issues lately. Why not use
> DuckDuckGo and write a
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:05:16 + (UTC)
Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Google is having more and more privacy issues lately. Why not use
> DuckDuckGo and write a 'bang' search for fedora sites?
> !fedora-guidelines, !fedora-package !fedora-wiki, etc.?
>
> --Ben
>
Couldn't care if they had a camera in me
On 1 November 2013 03:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Having as the only GUI package management application on your spin one that
> does not even offer all packages is very broken.
You forgot to type "in my opinion"...
>> We have a notion of 'core app' - for things that 'come with the OS'. We
>> don't
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:22:33 +
Frankie Onuonga wrote:
>
> I think this goes back to the concept of having something that we
> can do for ourselves.
It is a nice to have concept.
But Fedora users (even new ones) will use whatever "search engine"
they are comfortable\familiar with.
--
Regar
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:22:33 +
> Frankie Onuonga wrote:
>
> >
> > I think this goes back to the concept of having something that we
> > can do for ourselves.
>
> It is a nice to have concept.
> But Fedora users (even new ones) will use wha
why does Fedora's openssl not list "aesni" compared to RHEL?
the values below are showing it is in fact supported by both, on the
other hand "SSLCryptoDevice aesni" for Apache does not work on Fedora
and i am unsure if it is used automatically by default in that case
in doubt this may waste facto
since this is a very interesting thing i also wrote a bugreport
openvpn on RHEL would also support "--engine aesni"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025717
Am 01.11.2013 12:13, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> why does Fedora's openssl not list "aesni" compared to RHEL?
>
> the values below
About me And also professional users, doing some thing to download these
packages.
What about normal users !! what about the beginners ??
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:07:22 +0100
> From: zbys...@in.waw.pl
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
>
> On Fri, N
On 11/01/2013 11:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 11:08, schrieb Petr Viktorin:
On 11/01/2013 10:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 10:38, schrieb drago01:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-10-30 11:23,
Not worked during updating !
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:42:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
From: li...@petetravis.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Oct 31, 2013 6:08 PM, "مصعب الزعبي" wrote:
>
> بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم
>
> Hi,
>
> The result of updating Fedora by
Also for old names we can use (provides:) function.
I can turn around the problem but beginners can't.
> From: cicku...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:42:16 +0800
> Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> Censorship? I think we have no reason to cha
Great idea to hash package names.
Thanx
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:02:24 +0100
> Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
> From: drag...@gmail.com
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > Censorship? I think we have no reason to change
Ok , so what about last idea to hash package names ?
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:44:57 +0100
> From: msu...@redhat.com
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
>
> On 11/01/2013 12:38 AM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> > Proxies not banned.
>
> But can be.
>
> Renamin
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:07:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> > بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !!
> >
> > When any package have "proxy" word marked to (insta
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Hi Fedora folks,
>
> Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project
> Leader at Red Hat. If you don't, then salutations, and please feel
> free to check out my Fedora wiki page[1] for my background. :-)
>
> As of next
Am 01.11.2013 13:00, schrieb Petr Viktorin:
> On 11/01/2013 11:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> the rootkit in /tmp/cp is in your path?
>
> If . would have been in $PATH and I happened to be in /tmp, then yes.
> On the other hand if I install something in my home, it does not affect other
> users
An update here, since Bruno has also replied but is not subscribed to devel@.
I've had a look at some of the packages, found a few issues and added
comments in bugzilla.
* Busybox (and mindi-busybox) contain another bundled MD5 implementation
originally by Ulrich Drepper.
* "buffer" has been
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:47:36PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Just so its clear, I think I'm the only other person who works full
> time on Fedora at Red Hat, but I'm in a different part of the
> organisation and have a different reporting structure.
You're not the only one.
Actually, I'm not
Compose started at Fri Nov 1 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:51:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > Google is having more and more privacy issues lately. Why not use
> > DuckDuckGo and write a 'bang' search for fedora sites?
> > !fedora-guidelines, !fedora-package !fedora-wiki,
On 2013-11-01 13:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.11.2013 13:00, schrieb Petr Viktorin:
In both cases, everything the user had access to is compromised, including
.bash_profile itself. What other
*security* impact did you have in mind?
when i learned something about security than that the dange
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:09:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:07:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> > > بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The result of updating Fed
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Also, given that you can easily install the old packagekit
> package tools using the application installer, there's really no
> reason to get upset at all.
Yet people visibly _are_ upset in this thread, so there's something
wrong with that
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Packages are not interesting to desktop users, they
> are just an implementation detail of how to get something done. e.g.
> "Play my media file", "Open this document someone sent to me". Anyone
> wanting to do things like "install a mysql
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> Also, given that you can easily install the old packagekit
>> package tools using the application installer, there's really no
>> reason to get upset at all.
>
> Yet people visibly _a
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Packages are not interesting to desktop users, they
>> are just an implementation detail of how to get something done. e.g.
>> "Play my media file", "Open this document someone se
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:14 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> We can't make everybody happy all the time, sure, but there must be
>> something that can be done.
>> * Add a release note describing how to get a GUI that shows all packages?
>> * Make sure
Fedora is a global community, not company, published under free license for
fredom of computers.
Fedora has many many mirrors around the world, nobody can ban it to reach
anywhere.
Also this law is under restudy, Due to War in Syria.
Source forge and many websites that banned them-contents for S
Quoting Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (2013-11-01 13:52:31)
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:09:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:07:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> > > > بسم الله الرّحم
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design &
> > implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board that
> > is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of s
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:01:57AM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> We wanted to write an application that rocked for a certain set of
> users, rather than write a generic UI that wasn't really usable by
> anyone. Also, given that you can easily install the old packagekit
> package tools using the ap
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
> Hmm... It sounds like yumex would be much more discoverable if it included
> an appdata file :)
Done,
https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/82198add9daabcfcabe9d8bb7a28ef3190e920d7/misc/yumex-appdata.xml
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:58:19AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Speaking purely for myself and my own usage, I think this distinction makes
> plenty of sense. Except I don't even really want the old packagekit tools.
> If I'm looking for something desktop-application-y, an "app store" seems
> lik
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 10:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:58:19AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Speaking purely for myself and my own usage, I think this distinction makes
> > plenty of sense. Except I don't even really want the old packagekit tools.
> > If I'm lookin
Hi everyone,
Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
to provide some clarity on how the goals and principles could play out
in practice.
On 1 November 2013 14:00, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/82198add9daabcfcabe9d8bb7a28ef3190e920d7/misc/yumex-appdata.xml
There are numerous problems with that file, and it's not going to be
used by the parser. If you read
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appda
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 15:00 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Pete Travis
> wrote:
> Hmm... It sounds like yumex would be much more discoverable if
> it included an appdata file :)
>
> Done,
>
> https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/82198add9daabcfc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:26:47 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:47:36PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Just so its clear, I think I'm the only other person who works full
> > time on Fedora at Red Hat, but I'm in a different pa
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:07:11AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Adding this as a gnome shell search provider will make this *really* slick.
> > I see that's https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707594, but I don't
> > see it on my F20 test box. Is this going to be in gnome 3.10 or is it
Hi,
I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
%define do_build() \
mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
(cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
%{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{mingw%{1}_prefix}'
'TARGET=quazip-%{2}' ../libquazip; \
%{mingw%{1}_make} %{?_smp_mflags}; \
)\
%{nil}
Problem: when I call i.e. "%do_build 3
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
>
> %define do_build() \
> mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
> (cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
> %{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{mingw%{1}_prefix}' 'TARGET=quazip-%{2}'
> ../libquazip; \
> %{mingw%{1}_make} %
On 01.11.2013 15:59, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
%define do_build() \
mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
(cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
%{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{mingw%{1}_prefix}'
'TARGET=quazip-%{2}' ../libquazip; \
%{mingw%{1}_make} %{?_smp_mflags}; \
)\
%{ni
On 01.11.2013 16:07, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
%define do_build() \
mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
(cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
%{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{mingw%{1}_prefix}' 'TARGET=quazip-%{2}'
../
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Std:
de8ad4f39cc9984595bc219df01ee23b Class-Std-0.011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
commit 2aed7e66256e2afb3b3d7d07489e0f63276661de
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Nov 1 15:10:42 2013 +
Update to 0.011
- New upstream release 0.011
- Added 'how can I help' POD
- Fix overwritten warnings in UNIVERSAL::can (CPAN RT#30833)
- Removed git repository
On 01.11.2013 16:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 01.11.2013 16:07, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sandro Mani
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
%define do_build() \
mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
(cd build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
%{mingw%{1}_qmake_%{2}} 'PREFIX=%{m
On 11/01/2013 03:24 PM, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
Hi everyone,
Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
to provide some
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Std-0.011-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
2aed7e6... Update to 0.011
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On 11/01/2013 03:24 PM, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
Hi everyone,
Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
to provide some
On 1 November 2013 14:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Okay, thanks. This is really cool good stuff. Guess it's time to update my
> other laptop to Rawhide. :)
For those less brave, I've uploaded a screenshot here:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/gnome-software-shell-search.png
Also, if
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> On 1 November 2013 14:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Okay, thanks. This is really cool good stuff. Guess it's time to update my
> > other laptop to Rawhide. :)
>
> For those less brave, I've uploaded a screenshot here:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~
On Fri 01 Nov 2013 11:31:37 EDT, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
On 1 November 2013 14:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
Okay, thanks. This is really cool good stuff. Guess it's time to update my
other laptop to Rawhide. :)
For those less brave, I've uploaded a scre
On 1 November 2013 15:31, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> So if it has a session service, and a shell provider integration, does that
> mean we do overlays/highlighting on applications with updates pending in the
> shell
We don't do that at the moment, but we could add that as a feature in
[upstream] bu
The package follows the same pattern of other coin-or
packages already in Fedora, should be trivial do review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586
Thanks,
Paulo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code o
On 1 November 2013 15:36, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> Or even kick off a removal of an application from the overview?
Sure, that's certainly possible, I'd just need some UI mockups to work
from. Note, core apps are not removable, so we'd have to have some
kind of API to ask if an app is removable before
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 22:54 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:47:36PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > El Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:42:52 -0400
> > "Paul W. Frields" escribió:
> > > Hi Fedora folks,
> > >
> > > Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Projec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/01/2013 04:36 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> The package follows the same pattern of other coin-or packages
> already in Fedora, should be trivial do review.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586
>
Hi Paulo.
I ca
Fedora is a global community, not company, published under free license for
fredom of computers.
Fedora has many many mirrors around the world, nobody can ban it to reach
anywhere.
Also this law is under restudy, Due to War in Syria.
Source
forge and many websites that banned them-contents for
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Markus Mayer wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 03:24 PM, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
>> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
>> principles, but I h
2013/11/1 Antonio Trande :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/01/2013 04:36 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>> The package follows the same pattern of other coin-or packages
>> already in Fedora, should be trivial do review.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On 01.11.2013 15:24, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
> principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
> to provide
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction:
87382bd2f512b0703dd55da6b2b16ec4 Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:29:02PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> For those less brave, I've uploaded a screenshot here:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/gnome-software-shell-search.png
H -- that little shopping bag doesn't _quite_ say "available but not
installed" to me. I wond
On 11/01/2013 05:12 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 01.11.2013 16:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 01.11.2013 16:07, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sandro Mani
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some rpm macro magic:
%define do_build() \
mkdir build_win%{1}_%{2}; \
(cd build_win%{1}
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 05:12 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01.11.2013 16:09, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01.11.2013 16:07, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sandro Mani
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>
On 11/01/2013 09:38 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>>> On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas:
> On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 30.10.2
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
wrote:
> On 01.11.2013 15:24, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
>> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
>> principles, but
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Markus Mayer wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 03:24 PM, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
>> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
>> principles, but I
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
> principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller (cscha...@redhat.com) said:
> Hi everyone,
> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
> principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
> to provide
Not too sure what this discussion will lead to, but can I'd enjoy being
kept in the loop if you guys are implementing something :)
Btw, +1 to the issue.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedora
* مصعب الزعبي:
> When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) ,
> error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden.
A curious problem. Could you use the repositories on
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/ instead?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Great, thanks for doing that.
>
> Noticed while quickly looking over the file:
>
> - it is not valid xml: & needs to be escaped as &
>
> - 'gui' is not a great term to use. I'd suggest rewording the first
> sentence maybe as 'Yum extender i
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> Great, thanks for doing that.
>>
>> Noticed while quickly looking over the file:
>>
>> - it is not valid xml: & needs to be escaped as &
>>
>> - 'gui' is not a great term to use.
Thank You for attention,
Yes they are all downloadable,
But only if I use https.
> From: f...@deneb.enyo.de
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:00:54 +0100
>
> * مصعب الزعبي:
>
> > When any package have "proxy" word marked to
On 1 November 2013 19:27, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> Cleaned up the appdata xml
Thanks,
> https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/yumex.appdata.xml
> but I get errors from appdata-validate
> Can see what the problem is :(
You've got some odd non-utf8 char as the very first byte in the fil
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:30 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tim Lauridsen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Great, thanks for doing that.
> >>
> >> Noticed while quickly looking over the file:
> >>
> >> - it is not valid xml
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> You've got some odd non-utf8 char as the very first byte in the file:
>
>
Looks like the editor has written an Unicode BOM, after removing that it
validates ok
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:30 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tim Lauridsen
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Great, thanks for doing that.
>> >>
>> >> N
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 09:38 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> The attacker needs to be able to write to your home directory to
>> take advantage of it. And if he can do that (you lost) he has
>> numerous other ways of doing it.
>
> That is true. However, there i
Am 01.11.2013 20:55, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
> [1] It might matter for troubleshooting.
> [2] Possible privilege escalations attacks to get root's or other
> user's permissions are irrelevant to our discussion.
[2] is very courageous (to say it nice) in the context we talk
signature.a
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> Cleaned up the appdata xml
>
> https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/yumex.appdata.xml
Small errors here:
Control want package repositories there is enabled for current
session
maybe should be:
Control what package re
On Fri 01 Nov 2013 14:43:37 EDT, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller (cscha...@redhat.com) said:
Hi everyone,
Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
principles, but I have included s
Once upon a time, Miloslav Trmač said:
> I don't think this in practice matters _for security_[1]: Even the
> users that know ~/bin exists are extremely unlikely to be regularly
> checking its contents to see whether a malicious file hasn't been
> added.
And again, it isn't just directories in PA
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
