Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one

بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, I try to build arched subpackage from main (noarch) package. I can't and have this message : error: line 153: Only noarch subpackages are supported: BuildArch: noarch noarch Any ideas ?? Regards Mosaab -- devel mailin

Re: Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one

On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 09:05 +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: <بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم > > Hi, > > I try to build arched subpackage from main (noarch) package. I can't and have > this message : > > error: line 153: Only noarch subpackages are supported: BuildArch: noarch > noarch > Any ideas ?? The

RE: Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one

Ok, I read that message, but I search for a tweak. So I'll separate main package into (-core) nonarched, and meta one arched. Regards == Mosaab > Subject: Re: Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one > From: boche...@fedoraproject.org > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Wed, 30 Oct

[Test-Announce] 2013-10-30 @ 16:00 UTC - F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #6

# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #6 # Date: 2013-10-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's time for another round of F20 beta blocker bug review! We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze exception bugs. The current li

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On 10/29/2013 02:13 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Hi, I'm on the CC list of the review request for rubygem-vagrant [1] and randomly found a new review request for vagrant [2]. The two packages are AFAICT the same, and the former is stalled due to missing dependencies, the last one being rubygem-l

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams: > Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test >> i could rm -rf ~/ here >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/mkdir >> #!/bin/bash >> echo "i could rm -rf ~/ here" > > If I can write to files you own, it doesn't matter

Re: [AutoQA] #445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases

#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than other releases +- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues Component: tests | Resolution:

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On 30/10/13 09:16, Josef Stribny wrote: yes, according to guidelines[1], it should be named rubygem-vagrant since it's convention for all RubyGems. Is vagrant not an "Application package that mainly provides user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby" though? In which case by the thi

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/vagrant http://packages.debian.org/stable/vagrant M

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test i could rm -rf ~/ here [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/mkdir #!/bin/bash echo "i could rm -rf ~/ here" If I can write to files you

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams: >>> Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test i could rm -rf ~/ here [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/mkdir >>>

wipe maintainer Scott Henson nonresponsive

Hi, this is a contact attempt for the wipe maintainer Scott Henson according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Bug with contact attempts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019179 There are two other bugs without any response: https://admin.

dnf-0.4.6

Hi, I have just submitted the latest dnf as an F20 update [1]. It brings quite a few fixes and improvements, most significant of which are the history undo support and limiting the number of installed kernels. See the release notes [2] and the blog post [3]. Ales Kozumplik [1] http://bit.ly

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test i could rm -rf ~/ here [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: >>> On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams: > Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ m

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 02:03, schrieb Chris Adams: Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said:

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 11:27, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: >>> On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.10.2013 02:0

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 11:46, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:27, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrot

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On 10/30/2013 10:45 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/v

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 11:55, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 11:46, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.10.2013 11:27, schrieb Alec Leamas: >>> On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.10.2013 10:5

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) per

Broken dependencies: perl-Padre

perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COM

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc1

Broken dependencies: perl-BerkeleyDB

perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 On i386: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 On armhfp: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21 Pl

Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML

perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4

Broken dependencies: slic3r

slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.1

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:55, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 11:46, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:27, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrot

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 13:00, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote: >> i gave you a starting point to learn about security and the reason >> for sftp-chroot doing so is that someone could use race-conditions >> to bypass the security >> >> if you do not understand that allowing

Re: Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:26:49AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > I read that message, but I search for a tweak. > So I'll separate main package into (-core) nonarched, and meta one arched. Yes, that's the normal way to deal with this. -core or -common, depending on what makes sense. -- Matthew Mi

Agenda for Today's Cloud WG Meeting (2013-10-30 19:00 UTC)

Hello everyone. Our initial Cloud WG meeting today is today at 19:00 UTC (3pm EDT). We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the FESCo meeting in #fedora-meeting has been running more than an hour). All are welcome. == Communications == - mailing list vs. irc meetings - trac instance == Next Steps

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Josef Stribny wrote: > On 10/30/2013 10:45 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> >> What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" >> rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packagi

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 13:08, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 13:00, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote: i gave you a starting point to learn about security and the reason for sftp-chroot doing so is that someone could use race-conditions to bypass the security if you do

F-20 Branched report: 20131030 changes

Compose started at Wed Oct 30 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 10/30/2013 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 13:00, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote: i gave you a starting point to learn about security and the reason for sftp-chroot doing so is that someone could use race-conditions to bypass the security if you

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

> And how vagrant differs from rhc and other client command line tools > that are distributed as gems and follow this convention? What I would like to see in both rhc and vagrant would be: Provides: rhc respectively Provides: vagrant It feels natural to me, I have issued "yum install rhc" seve

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> And how vagrant differs from rhc and other client command line tools >> that are distributed as gems and follow this convention? > > What I would like to see in both rhc and vagrant would be: > > Provides: rhc > > respectively > > Provides:

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

Dne 30.10.2013 13:23, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a): On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Josef Stribny wrote: On 10/30/2013 10:45 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ?

Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

Hi All, Below is a draft governance charter for the Workstation WG. I have taken much of this from the Cloud WG draft charter (found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_WG) to have some commonality between groups. I left some of the sections from that off for now, as I think that is their

Re: Agenda for Today's Cloud WG Meeting (2013-10-30 19:00 UTC)

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Hello everyone. Our initial Cloud WG meeting today is today at 19:00 UTC > (3pm EDT). We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the FESCo meeting in > #fedora-meeting has been running more than an hour). All are welcome. > > == Communications ==

Schedule for Wednesday's (today's) FESCo meeting (2013-10-30)

(Apologies for the lateness.) Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2013-10-30 18:00 U

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/vagrant http://packages.debian.org/stable/vagr

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On 10/30/2013 01:41 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: And how vagrant differs from rhc and other client command line tools that are distributed as gems and follow this convention? What I would like to see in both rhc and vagrant would be: Provides: rhc respectively Provides: vagrant It feels natural

[Bug 1024821] New: ctstream-9 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821 Bug ID: 1024821 Summary: ctstream-9 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ctstream Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.

Re: Duplicate review request for rubygem-vagrant

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Josef Stribny wrote: > > What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" > rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming

Re: Agenda for Today's Cloud WG Meeting (2013-10-30 19:00 UTC)

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:06:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > You have basically the top-level landing page for the WG there. It > has all the relevant information one would expect, but I think some of > the sections go beyond governance. Specifically, the Mission, Role in > Fedora, and Communica

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: >>> >>> On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: > > On 2013-10-30 10:23, Reindl Harald wrote

Re: [Fwd: F19: "yum groups mark convert" problem]

Il giorno mar, 29/10/2013 alle 16.57 -0400, Przemek Klosowski ha scritto: > On 10/29/2013 02:07 PM, Dario Lesca wrote: > > > Il giorno mar, 29/10/2013 alle 09.38 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > > > Sorry for cross post, but I would avoid to reinstall my notebook > > > Someone can help me? > > >

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 10/30/2013 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 13:00, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 12:25, Reindl Harald wrote: No, it should not. However, the right decision is in many cases a trade-off between security and usabilty, not always with a single answer. Allowing users to instal

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 15:05, Christopher wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-10-30 11:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 11:20, schrieb Alec Leamas: On 2013-10-30 10:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 10:53, schrieb Alec Leamas: Some kind of reference for the

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 15:29, schrieb Ralf Corsepius: > On 10/30/2013 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Besides that, what and where users put things underneath of $HOME is not a > distro's busness and so it is not a distro's business to add something to $PATH inside the userhome and finally you agreed w

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:01:52AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > The Fedora Workstation Work Group has nine voting members, with one > member selected by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee as the > liaison to FESCo. Is the FESCo appointed member one of the nine voting members? -- Matthew Ga

[Bug 1024884] New: perl-Devel-Symdump-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024884 Bug ID: 1024884 Summary: perl-Devel-Symdump-2.11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Devel-Symdump Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jple

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote: >> On 10/28/2013 03:36 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 10/28/2013 01:20 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: Hi everyone. As FESCO appointed me last Wednesday as th

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:01:52AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> The Fedora Workstation Work Group has nine voting members, with one >> member selected by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee as the >> liaison to FESCo. > > Is the FES

[Bug 1024894] New: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.119 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024894 Bug ID: 1024894 Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated-1.119 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Deprecated Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2013 09:03 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ mkdir test i could rm -rf ~/ here >> >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/mkdir #!/bin/bash echo "i could >> rm -rf ~/ here" > > If I ca

[Bug 1024896] New: perl-Perl-Critic-More-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024896 Bug ID: 1024896 Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-More-1.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Perl-Critic-More Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assigne

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 10/30/2013 03:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 15:29, schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 10/30/2013 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Besides that, what and where users put things underneath of $HOME is not a distro's busness and so it is not a distro's business to add something to $PATH ins

Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2013 10:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Josh Boyer > wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch >> wrote: >>> On 10/28/2013 03:36 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 10/28/2013 01

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On 2013-10-30 15:50, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/30/2013 03:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.10.2013 15:29, schrieb Ralf Corsepius: On 10/30/2013 01:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Besides that, what and where users put things underneath of $HOME is not a distro's busness [cut] Is it really

Re: abrt Bugzilla summary

Thank you for all your ideas! I am going to change the default template to: [abrt] : (): killed by SIG Conclusion: - do not drop because some email clients cannot display custom headers in "index" - drop VR from because Ales Kozumplik is the only one who wants it (VR is always availa

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 556 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 70 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6 31 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 556 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 70 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5 46 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

Re: [389-devel] Please review lib389 ticket 47575: add test case for ticket47560

On 10/30/2013 10:47 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: Hello, This tickets implement a test case and propose a layout of the CI tests in the 389-ds. The basic idea is to put CI tests under: /dirsrvtests/ tickets/ standalone_test.py m1c1_test.py

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> If I can write to files you own, it doesn't matter if there's a >> directory in the PATH or not. I can write this to your .bash_profile: >> >>/bin/mkdir $HOME/.bin 2> /dev/null >>echo 'echo "i could rm -rf ~/ here"' > $HOME/.bin/mk

[Bug 1025004] New: Update from F19 to F20 fails due to perl version dependencies

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025004 Bug ID: 1025004 Summary: Update from F19 to F20 fails due to perl version dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Language-Expr Assignee: mh

Re: [389-devel] Please review lib389 ticket 47575: add test case for ticket47560

On 10/30/2013 06:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 10/30/2013 10:47 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: Hello, This tickets implement a test case and propose a layout of the CI tests in the 389-ds. The basic idea is to put CI tests under: /dirsrvtests/ tickets/ standalon

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 18:59, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >>> If I can write to files you own, it doesn't matter if there's a >>> directory in the PATH or not. I can write this to your .bash_profile: >>> >>>/bin/mkdir $HOME/.bin 2> /dev/null >>

Fedora search

Hi guys, I hope all is well. I am writing in regards to something I had written about two months ago. This in regards to the search engine. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1055#trac-add-comment I think we need to seriously fix this thing once and for all. I am looking at

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

Giving the FESCO rep a two year term seems to be a potential problem as they wouldn't be guaranteed to be in FESCO for two years and most of the time you'd probably want the rep to be a member of FESCO. Maybe the FESCO rep should just serve at the pleasure of FESCO? -- devel mailing list devel@

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 19:15:11 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: which is not possible at all, any application running with your user can write in your home directory and any security relevant bug in that application may result in changes That doesn't have to be the case. selinux can be used to

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-31 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2013-10-31 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2013-10-31 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2013-10-31 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2013-10-31 1

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Am 30.10.2013 19:51, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 19:15:11 +0100, > Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> which is not possible at all, any application running with your >> user can write in your home directory and any security relevant >> bug in that application may result in changes

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Giving the FESCO rep a two year term seems to be a potential problem as they > wouldn't be guaranteed to be in FESCO for two years and most of the time > you'd probably want the rep to be a member of FESCO. Maybe the FESCO rep > should just

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

Hi, On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > The other positions will be filled by general election > every two years. As a special exception, four seats will be filled in > one year, with those positions chosen at random (unless some number of > members decide to step down). Voting w

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> The other positions will be filled by general election >> every two years. As a special exception, four seats will be filled in >> one year, with those positions chosen at random (un

Re: Fedora search

Frankie Onuonga wrote: I am writing in regards to something I had written about two months ago. This in regards to the search engine. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1055#trac-add-comment I think we need to seriously fix this thing once and for all. I am looking at desig

Re: Draft Workstation WG Governance Charter

Hi, On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > In your opinion, should we have term limits imposed to ensure we have > fresh members coming into the WG? As I said in another email, I think > we should shoot for some continuity while also encouraging new members > to step up. Not sure.

Re: Fedora search

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Frankie Onuonga wrote: > >> I am writing in regards to something I had written about two months ago. >> This in regards to the search engine. >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/**fedora-infrastructure/ticket/** >> 1055#trac-add-comment

Re: [389-devel] Please review lib389 ticket 47578: removal of 'sudo' and absolute path in lib389

On 10/30/2013 07:56 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote: Hello Thierry, layout OK. As for tests - instead of reinventing the wheel by defing class Test_standAlone to set up instance, use py.test fixture. Also, you should not force setup, test, teardown execution for each test by specifying sub-methods for

Re: Fedora search

Frankie Onuonga wrote: My notion has always been that people always want something that is made in house. I do not think they will take up something that is in a "black box" but I might be wrong. Site search engines are mostly useless to me, and I know I'm not alone. Why else would the ticket

Re: [389-devel] Please review lib389 ticket 47578: removal of 'sudo' and absolute path in lib389

Ok I realise it is not a good idea. I will reimplement it and send an other review :-) Thanks for all your feedbacks. thierry On 10/30/2013 08:11 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 10/30/2013 12:56 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote: Hello Thierry, layout OK. As for tests - instead of reinventing the wheel b

Re: [389-devel] Please review lib389 ticket 47578: removal of 'sudo' and absolute path in lib389

On 10/30/2013 02:09 PM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 10/30/2013 07:56 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote: Hello Thierry, layout OK. As for tests - instead of reinventing the wheel by defing class Test_standAlone to set up instance, use py.test fixture. Also, you should not force setup, test, teardown executi

Summary/Minutes for Wednesday's (today's) FESCo meeting (2013-10-30)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-30) === Meeting started by notting at 18:01:19 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-30/fesco.2013-10-30-18.01.log.html . Meeting summary

Summary/Minutes for Cloud WG (2013-10-30)

= #fedora-meeting-1: Cloud (2013-10-30) = Meeting started by mattdm at 19:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-10-30/fedora-meeting-1.2013-10-30-19.00.log.html .

Re: Fedora search

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Frankie Onuonga wrote: > >> My notion has always been that people always want something that is made >> in house. >> I do not think they will take up something that is in a "black box" but I >> might >> be wrong. >> > > Site search engi

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > and no, you can't imagine an attack like "hey i have a sehll now and > try around where i can compromise your setup" - in most cases after > a buffer overlow and such things you have *one* chance to execture > your code before the application

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:08:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 30.10.2013 13:00, schrieb Alec Leamas: > > Current defaults already has ~/bin in $PATH, and user can certainly put > > things there. Isn't the issue here if having a hidden, writeable directory > > in $PATH is such a bad idea, giv

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-31 16:00 UTC)

Please check #350 again. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Wed, 30 Oct, 2013 at 14:05:05 GMT, Christopher wrote: > And, the xdg argument doesn't seem like a sufficient argument for > me... we're talking about login scripts, not X. It is very unintuitive > that an xdg-related directory would be on the default path for a bash > login, if you're not even r

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said: > you can do this and that - but that's no valid argumentation > doing bad things in default setups But you are calling it "bad" with no real argument except repitition. I've shown that it is not _any_ worse for security. > *at least* do not > place *hidden*

Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see it as a fundamental problem with udev which is in all current versions of Fedora. My USB GPS is a BU-353 which uses a pl2303 US