Hi Reartes,
On 10/18/2013 05:57 PM, Reartes Guillermo wrote:
I tested F20 on a physical host with a vertex3 ssd.
But it was not a requested test case, i re-used a md raid0 with a 6gb
partition of the ssd.
The file-system was setup as a storage pool for virt-manager.
I did not experience any is
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
The bad news is that we're still some way from a viable Beta RC. We need
work on several blockers, all of which is outlined below. I'll start
with bugs that need work from developers; QA folks, there are tasks for
us listed later on.
Compose started at Sat Oct 19 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
On 10/19/2013 07:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
The bad news is that we're still some way from a viable Beta RC. We need
work on several blockers, all of which is outlined below. I'll start
with bugs that need work from developers; Q
On 10/18/2013 06:54 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
wrote:
Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1].
There are >80 packages affected, would it be possible to give the
owners a shorter (and aut
Am 18.10.2013 22:58, schrieb Robert Relyea:
> On 10/17/2013 06:48 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> rpm uses prelink -y so it already works in most cases and the rare cases can
>> be fixed in prelink. The problem is its maintainer Jakub has more
>> significant
>> work to do nowadays.
>
> I use it a
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do
mention it if such a thing exists)...
At issue here are gtk3 applications that use non-standard (e.g. symbolic)
icons look particu
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
> prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
> if the new Workstation ended up just an unchanged GNOME[1].
[snip]
> [1] As opposed to any of 1) non-GNOME, 2) GNOME changed by Fedora,
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
> this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
file that is somehow "proprietary" becaus
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and as user i am asking you as phpMyAdmin maintainer why are
> you not keep the package up-to-date - they have a mailing list
> with release announcements, however i maintain my personal one
It would make more sense to help *solving* the open issues rath
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:04 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
> > this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
> package , I already requested commit permissions in acls , but nothing
> happen until now .
can you please provide any patches for review (e.g. via RHBZ) before jus
Hello,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what is needed to be resolved?
>
> my SPEC file is removing all the things i do not need and
> not things with bugs to solve - the reason why i build it
> myself honestly since years is that the fedora packages
> are way too often outdated
if yo
Am 19.10.2013 22:27, schrieb Robert Scheck:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> and as user i am asking you as phpMyAdmin maintainer why are
>> you not keep the package up-to-date - they have a mailing list
>> with release announcements, however i maintain my personal one
>
> It would
Am 19.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Robert Scheck:
> On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
>> this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
>
> you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
>
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:45 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Sérgio,
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
> > package , I already requested commit permissions in acls , but nothing
> > happen until now .
>
>
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 19.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Robert Scheck:
> > On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
> >> this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
> >
> > you notic
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:23 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:45 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > Hello Sérgio,
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > I use often and for me is an essential tool, I wish be maintainer of the
> > > package , I already requested c
Am 19.10.2013 23:26, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 22:16 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 19.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Robert Scheck:
>>> On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to ta
Hello Sérgio,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> you already have a propose to update to 4.0.x in
> http://anshprat.fedorapeople.org/rhbz959946/c12/
do not only read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959946#c12 but
also the other comments below - please.
Greetings,
Robert
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:31:49 -0600
Ken Dreyer wrote:
> If this really is the consensus of the Fedora community, then I would
> prefer that the guidelines on the wiki be specifically amended to
> require this. IMHO the language in the guidelines is simply too vague
> about this point.
Yeah, we sh
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 09:45 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017435 - "Anaconda uses
> > LVM when Standard Partition is selected in text mode" (anaconda) - this
> > bug has been verified fixed by the update
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, Paul Wouters wrote:
I'm not a really user of phpMyAdmin so if someone who actually uses
this package wishes to take maintainership, please do!
you noticed, that you pushed yet another version of phpMyAdmin with a *.swf
file that i
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:22:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:31:49 -0600 Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> > If this really is the consensus of the Fedora community, then I would
> > prefer that the guidelines on the wiki be specifically amended to
> > require this. IMHO the language in th
On Sáb, 2013-10-19 at 23:49 +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Sérgio,
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > you already have a propose to update to 4.0.x in
> > http://anshprat.fedorapeople.org/rhbz959946/c12/
>
> do not only read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959946#
On 17/10/13 06:45 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
However, activity log shows that you've assigned the ticket to
yourself on 2013-03-14 without being a sponsor. The first submitted
package of a new packager must be reviewed and approved by a sponsor.
Assigning the ticket could result in other spons
Hi list,
I'm building some packages which depend on the latest version of
pycairo, and an inprogress feature also needs its
rebuild(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005447) as well.
However the version in Fedora hasn't been updated for more than a
year, and also there is a name change
27 matches
Mail list logo
