On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Need to clarify if the DNF bindings will exist for both python2 and
python3 or just python3. This could affect releng, mock maintainer, etc.
Until Anaconda is in Python 2, DNF will support both Py2 and Py3. Once
Anaconda switches to Py3 DNF
Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
packaged yet ?
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi all,
We've been waiting to see if other people who couldn't make on Sunday
would also do some testing. That hasn't happened, so a few words on my
impressions on the test day are appropriate indeed.
First of all not many people really did some testing. We didn't expect
many people to participat
FYI this all appears to be working now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Hi!
The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.16 in rawhide only.
Dependent packages must rebuild.
CGSI-gSOAP *
davix *
fts
gfal (*)
gfal2 *
gridsite
lcgdm *
lcgdm-dav *
srm-ifce*
voms*
*) These have already been rebuilt. The gfal rebuild failed and
Hi,
On 10/18/2013 11:56 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Hi all,
We've been waiting to see if other people who couldn't make on Sunday
would also do some testing. That hasn't happened, so a few words on my
impressions on the test day are appropriate indeed.
First of all not many people really did some
Compose started at Fri Oct 18 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
Before too much longer I will need to withdraw the glusterfs.
(glusterfs-3.2.7 fwiw, very out of date, this version is a Requires for
another package, HekaFS.)
Withdrawal becomes necessary when RHEL starts to ship a subset of the
glusterfs packages.
But instead of withdrawing it, what if I
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:13:53PM +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:25:30AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b backing -o preallocation=metadata,compat=1.1
> > snapshot
>
> Backing file and preallocation cannot be used at the same time
>
> This
On Thu 17 Oct 2013 17:56:57 Barry Scott wrote:
> I need to patch ntp for my uses. But I find that the src rpm will not build
> on F19.
>
>
> cd . && env
> PATH="/home/bscott/rpmbuild/BUILD/ntp-4.2.6p5/ntpd:/home/bscott/bin:/usr/loc
> al/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin" autogen -
I'm offering to do one non-complex review for reviewing one of those
packages*:
* Feel free to take both, I'll review two of yours :)
ultimaker2-marlin-firmware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019852
Ultimaker2 firmware for the 3D printer. (Dependency of new cura update.)
gnome
> - Because it's hard to change an existing partition to a 'bcached'
> partition, it's not really tempting to test (there's a blocks utility
> under development that may help, currently backup-restore is the only way)
blocks[1] has been doing bcache conversion since forever (last march,
when the p
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
> packaged yet ?
The latter.
For me personally, I've been prioritizing getting all qt5-related modules
packaged first (still have 2-3 to go).
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> But instead of withdrawing it, what if I were to alter it to simply install
> /etc/yum.repos.d/community-glusterfs.repo file?
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=PackagingGuidelines#Configuration_of_Package_
On 18/10/13 13:38, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Before too much longer I will need to withdraw the glusterfs.
(glusterfs-3.2.7 fwiw, very out of date, this version is a Requires for
another package, HekaFS.)
Withdrawal becomes necessary when RHEL starts to ship a subset of the
glusterfs packages.
B
On 10/18/2013 09:55 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 18/10/13 13:38, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Before too much longer I will need to withdraw the glusterfs.
(glusterfs-3.2.7 fwiw, very out of date, this version is a Requires for
another package, HekaFS.)
Withdrawal becomes necessary when RHEL starts t
Summary of changes:
a8dec91... Initial import (perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
commit 7943c86a7f7b3e92bf12cee30a50bfd9b9aca560
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Oct 17 16:05:58 2013 +0100
Update to 2.38
- New upstream release 2.38
- Added methods to the generated objects to try to retrieve dist contents
from a local cpan mirror
- Some refacto
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:03:28 -0400
"Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:
> Okay, I'm okay with that. How about instead of a /etc/yum.repos.d/
> file if it's a /usr/share/doc/glusterfs.README containing
> instructions for how to use the community GlusterFS yum repo?
>
Are you allowed make a people repo?
ht
Summary of changes:
a8dec91... Initial import (perl-Archive-Peek-0.35-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On 10/18/2013 10:09 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:03:28 -0400
"Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:
Okay, I'm okay with that. How about instead of a /etc/yum.repos.d/
file if it's a /usr/share/doc/glusterfs.README containing
instructions for how to use the community GlusterFS yum repo?
commit 608e30acf0369b9843511df197027148eb1219e8
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Fri Oct 18 16:39:13 2013 +0200
1.003002 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Role-Tiny.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitigno
Summary of changes:
608e30a... 1.003002 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
commit 88fced6cbb254bc06de36475512c99f459ac2f71
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Oct 18 15:51:55 2013 +0100
Update to 0.044
- New upstream release 0.044
- Fixed child path construction against the root path
- Fixed path construction when a relative volume is provided as t
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Moo:
507697be655c7d79c14fabfb36577635 Moo-1.003001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
- Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:30:53 AM
> Subject: Re: how to withdraw glusterfs from epel?
>
> On 10/18/2013 10:09 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:03:28 -0400
> > "Kaleb S. KEITHL
commit 0e4cb9159410a4a3df8d21a58cb8a545a41b5d5c
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Fri Oct 18 16:55:02 2013 +0200
1.003001 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Moo.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitigno
Summary of changes:
0e4cb91... 1.003001 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 10/18/2013 10:54 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
Would it be against the guidelines to move to packaging it (the software
itself, not a repo file) in Fedora/EPEL as glusterfs-community?
I'm sure it is against the guidelines. Under any name it'd still be
shipping a set of RPMs that conflict with
Thanks Rex
Let me know if you need help for package reviews
I will be glad to help
Tim
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Is there some reason that PyQt5 is not in Fedora or has it just not been
> > packaged yet ?
>
> The latter.
>
> For
Am 17.10.2013 15:48, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:16:35 +0200, Robert Relyea wrote:
>> prelink throws rocks at a lot of packages that have to check the
>> integrity of the shared libraries they are using. It provides no real
>> useful way of assisting in those tasks,
>
> It p
commit 17bad99722b438fdeb914496ad9e93391f93241d
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Oct 18 16:51:26 2013 +0100
Update to 1.24
- New upstream release 1.24
- No longer mark BSD::Resource as required (GH #6)
- Skip core-dump tests on OS X; they're not as straightforward as the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-SearchPath:
5cc4743fcacfbe4decd9579d6251457e File-SearchPath-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
I tested F20 on a physical host with a vertex3 ssd.
But it was not a requested test case, i re-used a md raid0 with a 6gb
partition of the ssd.
The file-system was setup as a storage pool for virt-manager.
I did not experience any issues, i installed 2 F20 guest at the same time.
I even rebo
commit 543f333a3d358ef35701f12942af19a94f9c8808
Author: Kostas Georgiou
Date: Fri Oct 18 16:57:26 2013 +0100
Import spec file
.gitignore|1 +
perl-File-SearchPath.spec | 58 +
sources |1 +
3 files cha
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
> On Thu 17 Oct 2013 17:56:57 Barry Scott wrote:
> > I need to patch ntp for my uses. But I find that the src rpm will not build
> > on F19.
> >
> > cd . && env
> > PATH="/home/bscott/rpmbuild/BUILD/ntp-4.2.6p5/ntpd:/home/bscott/bin:/usr
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:19:30AM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >* Need to clarify if the DNF bindings will exist for both python2 and
> > python3 or just python3. This could affect releng, mock maintainer, etc.
>
> Until Anaconda is in Python
commit b6557a2df9f4163a6ef96b2bde2e50a2a6e553c4
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Oct 18 17:39:55 2013 +0100
Update to 0.0940
- New upstream release 0.0940
- Adds x-bzip2 (CPAN RT#67738)
- Migrated to Dist::Zilla
- Package new CONTRIBUTORS and LICENSE files
- This
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Rex
> Let me know if you need help for package reviews
> I will be glad to help
Great, we've still got a couple of qt5 related items on the tracker,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=qt-reviews
without reviewers yet. any assistance is more than
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.24-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
17bad99... Update to 1.24
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per
commit d3fc7e9f5ea5e91e9fea3d0d8fbb262c27aa3c29
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Fri Oct 18 18:45:59 2013 +0200
Added some Perl 5.18 compatibility patches for F20+
slic3r-perl518.patch | 72 ++
slic3r.spec |7 +
2 files changed,
commit 3b414378aec29b5da537787a88830b8109035c31
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Fri Oct 18 18:48:08 2013 +0200
Renamed second Patch2 to 3
slic3r.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/slic3r.spec b/slic3r.spec
index 6f4ca55..0e46ab0 100644
--- a/slic3
Summary of changes:
b6557a2... Update to 0.0940 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:06:31AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 10:54 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
>
> >
> >Would it be against the guidelines to move to packaging it (the software
> >itself, not a repo file) in Fedora/EPEL as glusterfs-community?
> >
>
> I'm sure it is against the
The lightweight tag 'perl-IPC-System-Simple-1.24-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
17bad99... Update to 1.24
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per
The lightweight tag 'perl-Archive-Any-0.0940-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
b6557a2... Update to 0.0940
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-d
The lightweight tag 'perl-Archive-Any-0.0940-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
b6557a2... Update to 0.0940
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-d
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> It is interesting to see such response from somebody who appears to be
> maintainer of Qt. Don't we ship 3 parallel installable version of Qt?
We indeed ship major (first digit!) versions of Qt as parallel-installable
versions. They are for all practical purposes different li
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:49:54 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I think that would be acceptable. It's content rather than code so
> falls under this section of the fedora packaging guidelines:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content
>
> Sin
Dan Horák wrote:
> I think it was me who promised to sponsor Peter. Being fully loaded
> with other work I waited for seeing the plus set for the review flag.
Well, the idea is that the sponsor is the one who sets the fedora-review+
flag for the new contributor's first review. I know the process
On 10/18/2013 10:14 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
Hi @all,
I've just check out https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/lib389.git/ and I'll
check the layout nkinder set up.
Then I'll ask you how to import the first tests using py.test.
Peace,
R:
Hi Roberto,
After some differents evaluations we
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> No one in the NSS team was consulted on this. I usually monitor the FESCO
> meetings announcements but missed this.
I try to make sure that the relevant maintainers are always Cc:ed on
the fesco tickets, I have missed this one. I'm sorry.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014206
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-threads-1.89-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
wrote:
> Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1].
There are >80 packages affected, would it be possible to give the
owners a shorter (and authoritative[1]) version, instead of asking
each maintainer to fish the information out of a bug with
Dear fellow developers,
unfortunately due to lack of time and other reasons, I'm unable to
maintain the following packages:
ctorrent
gnomeradio
obexfs
obexftp
I've orphaned them in F20+, and I'll gladly give them up in F18/19 if
anyone steps up.
ctorrent/dtorrent's upstream has been dead for over
On 10/17/2013 06:48 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:16:35 +0200, Robert Relyea wrote:
>> prelink throws rocks at a lot of packages that have to check the
>> integrity of the shared libraries they are using. It provides no real
>> useful way of assisting in those tasks,
> It provi
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dan Horák wrote:
>> I think it was me who promised to sponsor Peter. Being fully loaded
>> with other work I waited for seeing the plus set for the review flag.
>
> Well, the idea is that the sponsor is the one who sets the fedora-review+
> fl
On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
wrote:
Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1].
There are >80 packages affected, would it be possible to give the
owners a shorter (and authoritative[1]) version, instead of asking
each mainta
58 matches
Mail list logo
