- Original Message -
> On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> >
> > So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous
> > they took someone « outside the community » instead of you.
> >
> > It might not be what you're thinking, but it's really how you sound.
> >
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:25:50PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Or in other words: I don't think it makes much sense to turn this on
> > only at runtime inside the service file as matthew suggests, as it hides
> > the fact th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010057
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.20-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.20-7.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
On 10/07/2013 08:20 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
>On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
I'd say most of Fedora (and even most of Red Hatters) would quit immediately
in case the company starts behave like you think it behaves. And I'm saying
it as a guy who si
On 10/06/2013 04:06 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
The following need to be reviewed by the maintainer as there's a
number of builds or other issues:
plymouth
cups-filters
I've just submitted cups-filters update. I don't see any issues.
--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
2013/10/7 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>
> Or people turn a blind eye to the facts on what's actually taking place.
>
> - It places distrust in the community ( as came completely clear on last
> FESCO meeting )
>
>
Fesco members are all elected by contributors (no nominated members by Red
Hat), if you
Hi Jóhann,
I do agree with you that the interaction between Red Hat and Fedora
needs to be clearer, and that currently it is a bit vaguely defined and
thus it gives ground to conspiracy theories and feelings of
disenfranchisement.
That said I think you too need to be open to that Red Hat, like yo
Compose started at Mon Oct 7 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
Quoting Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (2013-10-05 05:29:57)
> Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all kinds of
> privileges within our community without as even bother to introduce
> themselves to the community even to the extent that fesco is now judging
> people if they are "so
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:25:50PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > Or in other words: I don't think it makes much sense to turn this on
> > > only at runt
Hello,
Because the "Too many open files" bug came back[1] and up until now DNF
had to be released in lockstep with librepo, the new build is coming out
earlier than expected. Please see the release notes [2] and a blog post
[3] about the release where I go into details why we no longer depend
Right, Tim fixed the issue and updates in Bodhi should once again receive
comments regarding "depcheck" and "upgradepath" checks.
There's an opt-in support for rpmlint/rpmguard checks for every package built
(the emails are sent to their maintainers), but I'm not clear whether this
opt-in suppo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> We really only wanted to enable forwarding from virbr0, to the LAN, but
> you can't toggle this per NIC afaick - you have to turn on the global
There seems to be per-NIC settings at:
/proc/sys/net/ipv*/conf/*/forwarding
Regard
Am 06.10.2013 22:18, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>>
>> So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous they
>> took someone « outside the community »
>> instead of you.
>>
>> It might not be what you're thinking, but it's rea
Hi Josh,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:59:24AM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
> > upstream of pam_mount pointed me to OpenSUSE's gpg-offline RPM macros at
> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/gpg-offline
> >
> > They allow to use a keyring and detached signature as additional source
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
2 packages were orphaned
pystatgrab [devel,f19,f20] was orphaned by fab
Python bindings for libstatgrab
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pystatgrab
tbb [EL-5] w
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> sagemath-5.10-2.fc21
>
> * Fri Oct 04 2013 pcpa - 5.10-2
> - Rebuild with newer rawhide atlas.
The previous version of sagemath was 5.10-4. Why did the release
number go backwards?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jam
2013/10/7 Jerry James :
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
> wrote:
>> sagemath-5.10-2.fc21
>>
>> * Fri Oct 04 2013 pcpa - 5.10-2
>> - Rebuild with newer rawhide atlas.
>
> The previous version of sagemath was 5.10-4. Why did the release
> number go back
Hi!
pgRouting is no longer under "GPLv2+ and Boost": The components under
Boost license were removed and thus the resulting license is GPLv2+.
Greetings,
Volker Fröhlich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of C
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:29:57AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all
> kinds of privileges within our community without as even bother to
> introduce themselves to the community even to the extent that fesco
> is now judging peop
20 matches
Mail list logo
