Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

> drago01:BADURL:inotify-tools-3.14.tar.gz:inotify-tools Thats because upstream no longer offer a 3.14 download. Dunno why. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On 10/03/2013 11:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: [cut] leamas:BADURL:xlwt-0.7.4.tar.gz:python-xlwt [cut] These are pypi urls which looks just fine to me (spectool -g works OK) --alec -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

On 10/03/2013 05:42 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 11.09.2013 21:31, Matthew Miller wrote: Introduction Based on discussions at and around Flock, the Fedora Project Board has approved a proposal for a big change in the way we put Fedora together. Rather than presenting one Fed

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

Il 03/10/2013 23:35, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other branches as other changes permit. hi gil:BADURL:iText-src-2.1.7.tar.gz:itext thats because upstream no longer offe

File File-Sync-0.11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Sync: 8bb0966ff3458699c02fde3d5c799824 File-Sync-0.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

Hi, In my case, the makeself source tarball is hosted on github. I've seen many people saying that github was down recently (even though it worked fine for me). curl -LI http://github.com/megastep/makeself/archive/release-2.2.0.tar.gz [... redirections stuff ...] HTTP/1.1 200 OK [... headers ...

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On 10/04/2013 11:49 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Hi, In my case, the makeself source tarball is hosted on github. I've seen many people saying that github was down recently (even though it worked fine for me). It was down for about two hours: https://status.github.com/messages -- Petr³ -- de

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:35:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. > Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other > > Lines in the output are of three forms: > > - BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME > > This me

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:35:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > raorn:BADSOURCE:wmMatrix-0.2-g97216606.tar.gz:wmMatrix > raorn:BADSOURCE:wmmon-1.0b2-g575778a6.tar.gz:wmmon > raorn:BADSOURCE:wmpager-1.2-g88ece7e5.tar.gz:wmpager Source tag is a link to repo.or.cz. Timestamps are changed each time arc

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:59:36PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > $ HEAD -S http://github.com/raorn/wmvolman/archive/2.0.1/wmvolman-2.0.1.tar.gz > Content-Type: application/x-gzip > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=wmvolman-2.0.1.tar.gz --2013-10-03 05:54:40-- http://github.com/raorn

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

Kevin Fenzi wrote: >On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 01:54:34 +0200 >Björn Persson wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >rombobeorn:BADURL:pragmarc-20130728.zip:PragmARC >> >> wget https://www.Rombobjörn.se/PragmARC/pragmarc-20130728.zip >> → 200 OK >> >> This server's uptime is currently 112 days, so either it wa

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2013 04:31 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 10/03/2013 05:42 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: >> On 11.09.2013 21:31, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> >>> Introduction >>> >>> Based on discussions at and around Flock, the Fedora Projec

F-20 Branched report: 20131004 changes

Compose started at Fri Oct 4 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6

Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin

Hi, anyone willing to review or swap reviews? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601 Thanks! Martin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

On 10/04/2013 02:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>What about Fedora Embedded? Do you plan to drop ARM support on >>Fedora? I can't match small credit card size devices with either >>Workstation, Server or Cloud group. Is this group list fixed or >>could be extended and on what basis? >> >> >> >>

Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2013 07:57 AM, Martin Krizek wrote: > Hi, > > anyone willing to review or swap reviews? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601 > > Thanks! Martin > Has JSMin finally

Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Martin Krizek" > Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 2:33:50 PM > Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/0

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Mihamina RKTMB wrote: > On 10/04/2013 02:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>What about Fedora Embedded? Do you plan to drop ARM support on >>Fedora? I can't match small credit card size devices with either >>Workstation, Server or Cloud group. Is

Rawhide buildroot broken?

I'm seeing this in root.log for all Rawhide builds: DEBUG util.py:316: Executing command: ['fedpkg', 'sources'] with env {'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'echo -n ""', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sb

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

I'm seeing this too. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6024388 -J On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > I'm seeing this in root.log for all Rawhide builds: > > DEBUG util.py:316: Executing command: ['fedpkg', 'sources'] with env > {'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'TER

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

Seems to be working OK here. Dan On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > I'm seeing this too. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6024388 > > -J > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> >> I'm seeing this in root.log for all Rawhide builds: >>

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2013 10:10 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > Seems to be working OK here. > > Dan > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Jon Ciesla > wrote: >> I'm seeing this too. >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6024388 >> >> -J >> >> >> O

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket #47415 "Manage certificates" crashes admin server

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47415/0001-Ticket-47415-Manage-certificates-crashes-admin-serve.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect] Created tag perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-1.61-1.fc21

The lightweight tag 'perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-1.61-1.fc21' was created pointing to: dd8b89e... Update to 1.61 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe

[perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect] Created tag perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-1.61-1.fc20

The lightweight tag 'perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-1.61-1.fc20' was created pointing to: dd8b89e... Update to 1.61 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > jjames:BADURL:DSDP5.8.tar.gz:DSDP The upstream host has a note on their web site explaining that the entire web site was rearranged, and gives directions on how to find new URLs for the various projects hosted there. The procedure fails for DS

Re: firewalld rewrite in C - outdated wiki page

On 10/02/2013 10:37 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 10/02/2013 08:33 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: I've found this page [1] with following content: - Targeted release: Fedora 16 - Last updated: 2011-06-27 - Percentage of completion: 10% Is it OK to have feature which is 10% complete and is stil

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47522 - Password administrators should be able to violate password policy

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47522 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47522/0001-Ticket-47522-Password-adminstrators-should-be-able-t.patch -- Mark Reynolds 389 Development Team Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

On 10/04/2013 11:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: The main change being made here is with how we are presenting *The Fedora Project* to the world. In the past, we've tried to be all things to all people, but going forward we want to pick a few specific areas that we will focus on (and market) part

[perl-HTTP-DAV] Update to 0.47

commit 5423c80aa1d722ebf4a228d46ef78b6c8141a36a Author: Paul Howarth Date: Fri Oct 4 16:13:50 2013 +0100 Update to 0.47 - New upstream release 0.47 - Fixed CPAN RT#38677: Intercept correctly 405 (Method now allowed) errors and report them to the clients - Fixed

[perl-HTTP-DAV/f20] Update to 0.47

Summary of changes: 5423c80... Update to 0.47 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2013 11:14 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/04/2013 11:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> The main change being made here is with how we are presenting >> *The Fedora Project* to the world. In the past, we've tried to be >> all thing

Re: Firefox and Gstreamer

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Why is gstreamer explicitly disabled for Firefox 24+? > > (before I make an RFE bug) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962728 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Firefox and Gstreamer

On 4 Oct 2013 23:45, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote: > > Why is gstreamer explicitly disabled for Firefox 24+? > > (before I make an RFE bug) There already is a RFE bug with all the details why its not enabled. > Thanks, > Michael > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://

Firefox and Gstreamer

Why is gstreamer explicitly disabled for Firefox 24+? (before I make an RFE bug) Thanks, Michael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2013 10:20 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 10/04/2013 10:10 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> Seems to be working OK here. > >> Dan > >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Jon Ciesla >> wrote: >>> I'm seeing this too. >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproje

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:55:38 +0200 Simone Caronni wrote: > Check ok on my side: > > $ wget http://linux.dell.com/dkms/permalink/dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz > --2013-10-04 08:54:36-- > http://linux.dell.com/dkms/permalink/dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz > Resolving linux.dell.com (linux.dell.com)... 143.166.224.62 >

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:15:47 +0200 Alec Leamas wrote: > On 10/03/2013 11:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > [cut] > > leamas:BADURL:xlwt-0.7.4.tar.gz:python-xlwt > > [cut] > These are pypi urls which looks just fine to me (spectool -g works OK) Looks like a ssl cert problem? http://www.scrye.com/~ke

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:49:47 +0200 Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hi, > > In my case, the makeself source tarball is hosted on github. I've seen > many people saying that github was down recently (even though it > worked fine for me). > > curl -LI > http://github.com/megastep/makeself/archive/releas

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:46:26 +0200 Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:35:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. > > Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and > > other > > > > Lines in the output are o

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:08:25 +0400 "Alexey I. Froloff" wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:59:36PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > > $ HEAD -S > > http://github.com/raorn/wmvolman/archive/2.0.1/wmvolman-2.0.1.tar.gz > > Content-Type: application/x-gzip Content-Disposition: attachment; > > filena

Re: How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I have a noarch package that depends on kernel-modules-extra that is > no longer being built for arm. What is the proper way to exclude my > package from arm? I can restore the empty package for you. -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> I have a noarch package that depends on kernel-modules-extra that is >> no longer being built for arm. What is the proper way to exclude my >> package from arm? > > I can rest

Re: How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:24:05PM +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >> I have a noarch package that depends on kernel-modules-extra that is > >> no longer being built for arm. What is

How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

I have a noarch package that depends on kernel-modules-extra that is no longer being built for arm. What is the proper way to exclude my package from arm? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fed

[Bug 707826] perl-Bio-SamTools missing from EL6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707826 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:21:19 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I have a noarch package that depends on kernel-modules-extra that is no longer being built for arm. What is the proper way to exclude my package from arm? I can rest

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47491 - Update systemd service file to use PartOf directive

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47491 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47491/0001-Ticket-47491-Update-systemd-service-file-to-use-Part.patch -- Mark Reynolds 389 Development Team Red Hat, Inc mreyno...@redhat.com -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Re: How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:44:38AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:21:19 -0400, > Kyle McMartin wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >>I have a noarch package that depends on kernel-modules-extra that is > >>no longer being built

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:21:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > What tool were you using for download? > spectool -g *.spec Which uses curl do download files... "remote-header-name" should be added to /etc/rpmdevtools/curlrc -- Regards,-- Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

Jerry James wrote: >On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> jjames:BADURL:DSDP5.8.tar.gz:DSDP > >The upstream host has a note on their web site explaining that the >entire web site was rearranged, and gives directions on how to find >new URLs for the various projects hosted there. A

Re: How to exclude and arch for a noarch package?

On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:44:38 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > [...] But I thought there were issues with doing exclude > arch for a noarch package. It's an ugly work-around. "noarch <=> no particular arch <=> any arch". Hence not publishing a noarch package for some arch is questionable. Unlike or

Re: Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

On 10/04/2013 03:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Now, what was really intended by that statement that you quoted above (and I acknowledge I'm putting words in people's mouths a bit) is that Red Hat*may* flex its muscles a bit if the community were to do something extremely unlikely that would be

Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that > the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and > total sheninagan on RH behalf as came apparent on last FESCO meeting Jóhann, you're

Re: Review swaps: perl-Parse-DebControl, devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring, jetring + question: where to install keyrings?

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > >>On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>>On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro

[389-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : 389-ds-base #157

See -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

sysctl behavior for docker-io

So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io requires IP forwarding enabled With respect to packaging, we'd like to have docker-io installation set sysctl values to enable IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011680 I was told on #fedora

Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:41:55AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Cc: "Martin Krizek" > > Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 2:33:50 PM > > Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, py

Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:41:55AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Cc: "Martin Krizek" > > Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 2:33:50 PM > > Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, py

Re: sysctl behavior for docker-io

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io > requires IP forwarding enabled > > With respect to packaging, we'd like to have docker-io installation set > sysctl values to enable IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:17:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:15:47 +0200 > Alec Leamas wrote: > > > On 10/03/2013 11:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > [cut] > > > leamas:BADURL:xlwt-0.7.4.tar.gz:python-xlwt > > > [cut] > > These are pypi urls which looks just fine to me (sp

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:00:07AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > jjames:BADURL:DSDP5.8.tar.gz:DSDP > > The upstream host has a note on their web site explaining that the > entire web site was rearranged, and gives directions on how to find > ne

Re: sysctl behavior for docker-io

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:04:19PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io > > requires IP forwarding enabled > > > > With respect to packaging, we'd like to have doc

Re: sysctl behavior for docker-io

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:21:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > Josh (cc'd) said libvirtd would enable it, but we still need to take care of > this for docker+lxc. If we pick libvirt-lxc as the preferred configuration, we can maybe get away with just documenting changes needed if you want to u

Re: sysctl behavior for docker-io

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:21:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:04:19PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > > So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io > > > requires IP fo

Re: Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that > > the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and > > total sheninagan on RH

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Virt Test Day is October 8th!

Hey all, The Fedora 20 Virt Test Day is this coming Tuesday, October 8th. Check out the test day landing page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-08_Virtualization If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, there's step by step instructions for: * Snapshot UI i

Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

On 09/24/2013 03:16 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: Hi there, I can see that thunderbird 24 had been built successfully and then reverted on the fc18 branch (and others). The git commit log and the spec changelog say Revert to 17.0.8 and nothing else. I do understand that more than a "successful b

Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

On 09/26/2013 07:05 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: Maybe we'll find a way to use git more gittish one day. If the git commit messages or notes automated the process of generating a spec changelog or bodhy comments people would be happily filling them in, I guess! Abso-fornicating-lutely. This topic

Re: Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

On 10/04/2013 09:50 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Miller mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: I'm sorry Jóhann, but I can't sit here and watch you make those kinds of accusations without sharing what I saw and experienced while I was an insider at Red

Re: Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

On 10/04/2013 06:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and total sheninagan on RH behalf as came appa

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:21:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > What tool were you using for download? >> spectool -g *.spec > Which uses curl do download files... Current one does. But the one Kevin used for this run on CentOS 5 uses w