Re: rubygem-passenger - FTBFS on f20 - need help

On 09/18/2013 06:45 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:19PM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote: What is a good way to track down a solution to "error: reference to 'uint32_t' is ambiguous"? Sorry for the multiple mails but after looking at the source I think I see the actual problem. S

Review swaps: perl-Parse-DebControl, devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring, jetring + question: where to install keyrings?

Hi, In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring and jetring. Reviews are here: - jetring: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:30:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > OCaml 4.01.0 is a new major release of the language. > > I'm not expecting any incompatibilities, but it will require a mass > rebuild of the 100 or so Fedora OCaml packages in Rawhide, which I > will do this weekend. The packa

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha status is Go, release on September 24, 2013

At the Fedora 20 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2 that just occurred, it was agreed to Go with the Fedora 20 Alpha by Fedora QA, Release Engineering and Development. Fedora 20 Alpha will be publicly available on Tuesday, September 24, 2013. Meeting details can be seen here: Minutes: http://bit.ly/16chiA

Need some help writing gitlab and gitlab-shell specs

Cross posting this in ruby-sig since this concerns ruby packaging and in devel since I have some more generic questions. Excuse me if I created unecessary noise. For those not familiar with the project, you'll find some info here [http://axilleas.me/tag/gsoc.html]. Let me start with the direct

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

On Sep 19, 2013 12:53 PM, "Michael Schwendt" wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:51:28 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > On 13.09.2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > >> On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > >> > > >

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 01:00:43PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Cc'd Dennis to see if this can happen in koji. If it can't I would not be > opposed to the new package unretiring the name and having the pkgdb entry > updated to the new package. The git history would have both the old > package

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

> A few years ago, there would have been a helpful answer from the admins > who would/wouldn't process such requests. I don't know whether it's possible > to not only rename a git repo but also the stuff within pkgdb and koji. Cc'd Dennis to see if this can happen in koji. If it can't I woul

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:51:28 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 13.09.2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > >> On 09/12/2013 10:40 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > >> > >>> I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic >

Intent to retire: wimax, wimax-tools

Because it's pretty much dead upstream, getting towards dead in real-world deployments, and never really worked well anyway in Linux. Orphaned in F20, rawhide. If no one wants to grab it, will retire in a week or two. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:00:43 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi escribió: > On Sep 19, 2013 12:53 PM, "Michael Schwendt" > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:51:28 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > > > On 13

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

We have no ability to rename a package in koji. im not opposed to reusing the name. Just need some way to ensure its very clear the old and new are different. Likely need to add a conflicts with the old one. hopefully versions allow for upgrade okay, if not an epoch will need to be added. Dennis

Re: Package name conflict with retired package

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: >> We have no ability to rename a package in koji. im not opposed to >> reusing the name. Just need some way to ensure its very clear the old >> and new are different. Likely need to add a conflicts with the old one. >> hopefully versions allow f

Re: Intent to retire: wimax, wimax-tools

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:26:08PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Because it's pretty much dead upstream, getting towards dead in real-world > deployments, and never really worked well anyway in Linux. > > Orphaned in F20, rawhide. If no one wants to grab it, will retire in > a week or two.

Re: Review swaps: perl-Parse-DebControl, devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring, jetring + question: where to install keyrings?

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an > easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review > here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring > and jetring. Rev

Re: Intent to retire: wimax, wimax-tools

On 09/20/2013 02:41 AM, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:26:08PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Because it's pretty much dead upstream, getting towards dead in real-world > deployments, and never really worked well anyway in Linux. > > Orphaned in F20, rawhide. If no one want

[perl-Pod-Spell] 1.07 bump

commit d857f360a0c5b948497c38cd3bc0d92b617f90a9 Author: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Fri Sep 20 08:35:53 2013 +0200 1.07 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Pod-Spell.spec | 11 ++- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.