On 16.09.2013 07:55, P J P wrote:
>Hello Tomasz,
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Tomasz Torcz
>> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>> You seem to have missed this Fedora *18* feature:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default
>> firewall-cmd is supposed to isol
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 00:04 +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
> I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer.
>
> The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedo
commit 413aa8a8f28b9394106c9d4587cde1aeae3ebc34
Author: Miro Hrončok
Date: Tue Sep 17 10:14:50 2013 +0200
New version 64 (#1008403)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-NumSeq.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
dif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008407
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1008856
--
You are receiving this
Hi Mateusz,
- Original Message -
> From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>
> Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
> connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
> network named "MyHomeNet" one can associa
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386
>
> This still doesn't boot. (We're working on it.)
Matt,
any news on this?
Thanks
Jaroslav
> --
> Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
> --
>
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
>network named "MyHomeNet" one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
>and for network "CoffeShowHotSpot" one assigns Public z
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:26:55PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > >
> > > > For example if you use mutt then all
On 09/17/2013 11:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named "MyHomeNet" one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
and for net
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Alpha.
This is the second attempt to release Fedora 20 Alpha.
Thursday, September 19, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public relea
Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>>connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
>>network named "MyHomeNet" one can associate Home zone in NetworkMa
On 17.09.2013 12:31, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Wireless networks have unique "names" and are represented as different
>>> connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
>>> network nam
On 09/16/2013 11:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
Jakub Filak wrote:
I wonder if someday it would make sense to customize this per user?
Possibly too much complexity...
kevin
ABRT provides per component customization.
https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#
> > ABRT provides per component customization.
> >
> > https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#component-specific-bugzilla-bug-formatting
>
> Excellent. Given that almost no packages are shipping these, is there
> any guideline or guidance how to do so? Just add them to our packages?
> Anything we
On 09/15/2013 08:52 PM, P J P wrote:
Why are there so many chains? Most are empty. Those which have rules, jump
from one chain to another and that jumps to yet another.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907375#c2
Multicast DNS is allowed in the internal network(chain IN_internal_all
P J P wrote:
> Hmmn, it should have been a package for user to install at will, rather
> than a replacement of an understandable firewall.
+1, the fact that this is opt-out rather than opt-in (even for upgrades from
Fedora ≤ 17 – I had to go out of my way to disable that "feature"
immediately af
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Also please note that you are not to Retire packages for stable
> Fedora's we have no way to remove them and If you retire it they will
> be in a weird state where the package will be in the repos and
> available to install but koji will say its blocked. It will create
> con
Dennis Gilmore writes:
> [...] Also please note that you are not to Retire packages for
> stable Fedora's [...]
Can this be mechanically enforced?
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://f
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:44 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:31:22AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > >
> > > > Other things like reading from remot
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 12:24 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:44 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 16:43 +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> You definitely need the fsync before doing the fiemap.
> We saw this on certain file systems including ext4 when adding
> fiemap support (efficient reading of holes) to cp.
> This is a bug in the fiemap interface IMHO in that it returns
> fa
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1209703/
2. xulrunner seen 10191 times (6% of all reports)
https://retrace
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.012-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
d8b724a... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.012-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
d8b724a... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386
> >
> > This still doesn't boot. (We're
On 17.09.2013 15:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> P J P wrote:
>> Hmmn, it should have been a package for user to install at will, rather
>> than a replacement of an understandable firewall.
>
> +1, the fact that this is opt-out rather than opt-in (even for upgrades from
> Fedora ≤ 17 – I had to go out
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
> In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
>
> 1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/120
Hi,
the package 'xorriso' is retired, but not yet blocked, because 'cdw'
depends on it. Therefore either 'xorriso' needs to be unretired with a
review or 'cdw' needs to be retired or drop the dependency.
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
What a mess! I sure do seem to be attracted to bundled library issues, like
insects are attracted to shiny lights. :-(
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:03:48 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
>> I adopted libeio back when Node.js still bundled it
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> I'd be quite happy if someone would take perl-IO-AIO off my hands. My only
> interest in it is as an (optional) backend and test dependency of
> perl-AnyEvent, which I co-maintain - I picked it up when a previous
> maintainer orphaned it.
>
> I
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a
> summary of what I'm doing:
While looking through the packages still needing a rebuild, I have
noticed all 3 of the following:
- ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
- Excl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler:
fd04ee3f4c2164b7f7909d85f11e467a Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
Hi,
I'd like to retire the python-jinja package, containing the Jinja1
template engine, which has been superseded by Jinja2 for a very long
time. Jinja2 is packaged as python-jinja2 in Fedora.
However, there's one package left that depends on it: olpc-library.
Can anyone comment on the status of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
5cc9e37... Update to 0.12 (documentation fixes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
Bug ID: 1009094
Summary: RFE: Upgrade F18's perl-Try-Tiny to >= 0.12
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-Try-Tiny
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter: rc040...@fre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
There's a buildroot override in place for this too.
koji wait-repo f18-build --build=perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1008300
--
You are receiving this m
# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2013-09-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Go/No-Go #2 will be on this Thursday, so it's time for what will
hopefully be the last last blocker review meeting for F20 alpha.
We'll be runni
In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
on the builder ?
Does the build system keep the build logs of old packages, ie that sho
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Till Maas wrote:
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time ago, but not yet blocked:
autotrust
They might also lack a dead.package, but I will write a separate mail
about this.
Indeed. fixed. (autotools was merged int
I'll look at fixing up xorriso... Upstream seems to be active.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-0d256e64 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-3f256e56 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
http://dl
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:30 PM, David Timms wrote:
> In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
> an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
> upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
> on the builder ?
>
> Does
Hello guys,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
the stand-
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'll look at fixing up xorriso... Upstream seems to be active.
xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8737
[2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=12680
--
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:52:51PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Till Maas wrote:
>
> >I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
> >were retired some time ago, but not yet blocked:
>
> >autotrust
>
> >They might also lack a dead.package, but I will
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:06:42PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
> xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
> the stand-alone package xorriso bundles a bunch of libraries.
It is now block
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a
> > summary of what I'm doing:
>
> While looking through the packages still needing a rebuild, I have
I am no longer able to dedicate the time that the plone and zope packages
need to be able to run on Fedora. I am orphaning these packages as of today
and hope another community member is able to pick them up.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On 09/17/2013 06:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
the package 'xorriso' is retired, but not yet blocked, because 'cdw'
depends on it. Therefore either 'xorriso' needs to be unretired with a
review or 'cdw' needs to be retired or drop the dependency.
I just blocked the following packages in koji for
Hello,
- Original Message -
> From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
> Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
>
> Maybe, true but I doubt that simpler set of rules, that never get
> audited, written by inexperienced users are more secure than "complex"
> rules in FirewallD which at last had chance to be
53 matches
Mail list logo
