On 10 September 2013 06:45, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 10:54 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the put down. However, firstly I'm not referring to the
>> fqdn issue, but the mention of dropping user name and secondly I'm not
>> the administrator of all the systems I use
On 10.09.2013 10:38, poma wrote:
>
> $ checkisomd5 --verbose boot.iso
> boot.iso: 58c742f8c6aa17da32e82c4ca541ec24
> Fragment sums: 2f42915afa918218c24a59a23e346a3f931376eafddb5f75443daecaf88f
> Fragment count: 20
> Press [Esc] to abort check.
> Checking: 100.0%
>
> The media check is complete,
Hello maintainers and future packagers,
To improve the productivity and easily triage of design related
software, please send a SCM admin request to InitialCC to design-sw FAS
pseudo user[1] for your maintained package i.e. Gimp to name a few and
add yourself to Design Software wiki page [2].
Hi,
i have a new open review.
faience-icon-theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005718
I cleaned this icon-theme from any nonfree and trademarks icons and need it for
mate-themes-extras which has a broken dependencies since faenza-icon-theme is
droped for legal reasons.
I'm really h
Hi folks,
I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide
currently).
emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages
Do you think that it is a good idea to separate them into groups like
emacs-org (directory /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/org)
emacs-progmodes (direct
On 09/10/2013 01:54 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide
currently).
emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages
Do you think that it is a good idea to separate them into groups like
emacs-org (directory /usr/share/em
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:54:47 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide
> currently).
> emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages
> Do you think that it is a good idea to separate them into groups like
>
> emacs-
On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:54:47 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide
currently).
emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages
Do you think that it is a good idea to sepa
On 09/10/2013 01:54 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide
currently).
emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages
Man pages and infos should be part of the package they document. They do
not belong into "*-common".
commit 03522568913b5d95f8cdd8ae19743b34548d6f59
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue Sep 10 15:54:26 2013 +0200
0.006000 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Contextual.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
di
Hi,
as an emacs user, splitting emacs-common has little value to me, and
without a package requiring most of the splitted packages, it might even
turn into an annoyance (much like texlive).
My 2cts
Best regards.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Summary of changes:
95703ae... 0.9904 bump (*)
34073eb... Fix the Epoch again (*)
1dbcd41... Release bump to (hopefully) fix the build (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006306
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006003
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-version-0.99.04-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-version-0.99.04-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005986
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Date-Manip-6.41-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Le 09/09/2013 22:08, Elad Alfassa a écrit :
> If you have any specific questions (after reading both commit messages),
> we'll be happy to answer them.
Yes, I have found how to add this file, thanks.
I you really want this to succeeds and to be adopted by application
upstream, we need to provide
On 09/10/2013 10:06 AM, 80 wrote:
as an emacs user, splitting emacs-common has little value to me, and
without a package requiring most of the splitted packages, it might
even turn into an annoyance (much like texlive).
Yeah, 4872 packages reported by repoquery texlive*. That's over 12% of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=138
Bug 138 depends on bug 1000320, which changed state.
Bug 1000320 Summary: Please build perl-Net-OAuth for EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000320
What|Removed |Added
--
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
506
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
9
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
Per:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1171
I have added a set of cols to the spins page for f20:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Releases%2F20%2FSpins&diff=352468&oldid=340210
One each for "Alpha" "Beta" and "Final"
kde and desktop are release blocking so they will always be
Empathy's "People Nearby" feature doesn't work out of the box because the required ports
are blocked by default by the firewall (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844308). It's
a similar story with Gnome's "Media Sharing" feature, and I'm sure there are lots of
other examples.
Now,
A question has come up in #fedora-apps as to whether or not we should
publish fedmsg messages for voting. In particular, we're looking
now at the new "nuancier" webapp[0] that will be used to vote on
supplemental wallpapers. It is in development. There is a demo
instance[1].
There is a pull req
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:08:20PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> What is under question is that it publishes a message for each set of
> votes cast by users[3]. It includes the number of votes cast, the fas
> username of the person who did the voting, and in what election they
> voted. It does *not*
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> A question has come up in #fedora-apps as to whether or not we should
> publish fedmsg messages for voting. In particular, we're looking
> now at the new "nuancier" webapp[0] that will be used to vote on
> supplemental wallpapers. It is in dev
On 31/08/13 09:36 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Maros Zatko wrote:
>> Hello dear Fedora comunity,
>>
>> I've hit very weird bug which happen to get very urgent now.
>> Something (very likely GTK{2,3} but not sure at all) is stealing my
>> mouse focus so t
Am 10.09.2013 22:58, schrieb Heiko Adams:
> Am 10.09.2013 22:07, schrieb Peter Oliver:
>> Empathy's "People Nearby" feature doesn't work out of the box because
>> the required ports are blocked by default by the firewall
>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844308). It's a similar
>>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:24:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>> > What is under question is that it publishes a message for each set of
>> > votes cast by users[3]. It includes the number of votes cast, the fas
>> > username of the person who di
> FWIW, if you log in to https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ and visit
> your profile,
I got "Internal Server Error" when I tried this... and now I'm on the
home page, when what I really wanted was to make sure I had nothing to
do with it :-P
> you can opt out of all badge-stuff in one click ("De
Am 10.09.2013 22:07, schrieb Peter Oliver:
> Empathy's "People Nearby" feature doesn't work out of the box because
> the required ports are blocked by default by the firewall
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844308). It's a similar
> story with Gnome's "Media Sharing" feature, and I'
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:16:08PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> There is a record of you presenting yourself at a public polling place
> - being a public place that fact is by its nature public in some
> sense. But I doubt there is any record of whether you actually cast a
> ballot or for which offices y
On 10 September 2013 14:24, inode0 wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > A question has come up in #fedora-apps as to whether or not we should
> > publish fedmsg messages for voting. In particular, we're looking
> > now at the new "nuancier" webapp[0] that will be used
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I never considered this until today. In the US elections I attend,
> they have my name on a list at the voting precinct. When I come in to
> vote I sign my name and they mark that I've come in. Until today I'd
> never thought if that inf
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:50 PM, inode0 wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:24:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>>> > What is under question is that it publishes a message for each set of
>>> > votes cast by users[3]. It includes the number of
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-INET6Glue:
100a4b5550a05925bf7af5acf0597a6a Net-INET6Glue-0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
#416: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist
--+
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:24:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> > What is under question is that it publishes a message for each set of
> > votes cast by users[3]. It includes the number of votes cast, the fas
> > username of the person who did the voting, and in what election they
> > voted. It does *
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:50:58PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>> No. In what election where the votes cast are secret is the fact of
>> voting public? I can't recall ever participating in such an election
>> but maybe my head is full of mud today.
On 10 September 2013 14:50, inode0 wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:24:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> >> > What is under question is that it publishes a message for each set of
> >> > votes cast by users[3]. It includes the number of
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:46:17PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 10 September 2013 14:24, inode0 wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > > If we are able to add fedmsg messages to this, then we will be able to
> > > award badges for voting on wallpapers. That
Hi,
I have a very weird problem. I'm trying to update the EPEL
branches of json-c to 0.11. It builds just fine on EL5, but on EL6 the
build crashes at
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id
/builddir/build/BUILD/json-c-json-c-0.11-20130402
extracting debug info from
/builddir/build
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:50:58PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> No. In what election where the votes cast are secret is the fact of
> voting public? I can't recall ever participating in such an election
> but maybe my head is full of mud today. I have an expectation that my
> voting behavior is private.
On Sep 10, 2013 2:16 PM, "inode0" wrote:
>
> There is a record of you presenting yourself at a public polling place
> - being a public place that fact is by its nature public in some
> sense. But I doubt there is any record of whether you actually cast a
> ballot or for which offices you voted th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:21:30PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> > For example, in most elections in the United States. I'm sure the
> > particulars vary by state, but it is the general case. For example, here's
> > Iowa: http://sos.iowa.gov/elections/voterreg/voterlistrequests.html; in that
> > case, I d
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:57:45PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > > you can opt out of all badge-stuff in one click ("Deactivate
> > > > Account").
> > >=20
> > > Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges?
> >
> > Just the badges. You won't show up on the badges.fp.o frontpage, or
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:53:59PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> > But anyway, if people feel really strongly about this, I think the opt out
> > of badge tracking is an okay approach. (Even if it makes more checkboxes.)
> I find it hard to agree that forcing people to opt out of things they
> reasonably
> Oh no! Sorry about that. I just tried it too but I couldn't
> duplicate the error.
It worked this time, must have been new-account-mess.
> > > you can opt out of all badge-stuff in one click ("Deactivate
> > > Account").
> >=20
> > Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges?
>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 09/09/2013 22:08, Elad Alfassa a écrit :
>
> > If you have any specific questions (after reading both commit messages),
> > we'll be happy to answer them.
>
> Yes, I have found how to add this file, thanks.
>
> I you really want this to succ
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:11PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >> Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges?
> >
> > Just the badges. You won't show up on the badges.fp.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:53:59PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>> > But anyway, if people feel really strongly about this, I think the opt out
>> > of badge tracking is an okay approach. (Even if it makes more checkboxes.)
>> I find it hard to agre
On 09/10/2013 02:40 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
I have a very weird problem. I'm trying to update the EPEL
branches of json-c to 0.11. It builds just fine on EL5, but on EL6 the
build crashes at
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id
/builddir/build/BUILD/json-c-json-c-0.11-201304
On 2013-09-10 23:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.09.2013 22:58, schrieb Heiko Adams:
Am 10.09.2013 22:07, schrieb Peter Oliver:
Empathy's "People Nearby" feature doesn't work out of the box because
the required ports are blocked by default by the firewall
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > FWIW, if you log in to https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ and visit
> > your profile,
>
> I got "Internal Server Error" when I tried this... and now I'm on the
> home page, when what I really wanted was to make sure I had nothing t
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>> > FWIW, if you log in to https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ and visit
>> > your profile,
>>
>> I got "Internal Server Error" when I tried this... and now I'm on the
>> home page,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:21:30PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>> > For example, in most elections in the United States. I'm sure the
>> > particulars vary by state, but it is the general case. For example, here's
>> > Iowa: http://sos.iowa.gov/ele
Hi,
I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1].
During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that
adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstream dev is very patient
and willing to help me, but I feel I have wasted enough of his time.
The guilty gcc flag seems
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:13:03PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> How shallow are Fedora contributors if a badge is what it takes to tip
> them over from being non-voters to being voters? If doing this
> increases our turnout from 300 voters to 900 voters the only thing
> I'll conclude is that we have 600
> Yes, of course I can help with testing.
Update is submitted here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postgresql-9.3.0-1.fc20
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:05:21 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 02:40 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > Running find-debuginfo.sh manually in the mock chroot, I get
> >
> > $ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
> > --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/json-c-json-c-0.11-20130402/
> > find: canno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I'm Michael Hampton. I've been using Fedora for its entire existence, and Red
Hat Commercial Linux before that, starting around 3.0.3 or so. Until now,
though, I've never really had a good opportunity to contribute back, aside from
th
On 09/10/2013 04:37 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:05:21 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/10/2013 02:40 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Running find-debuginfo.sh manually in the mock chroot, I get
$ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
--strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/json-c-json-c
On Sep 10, 2013 3:00 PM, "inode0" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >>
> >> > FWIW, if you log in to https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ and visit
> >> > your profile,
> >>
> >> I got "Internal Server Erro
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:44:35PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
> How about something that is more analogous to voter registration? If
> you login to the voting app during an election you get a voting badge
> of some sort without indicating anything specific about the election?
> That would raise awareness
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:13:03PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>> How shallow are Fedora contributors if a badge is what it takes to tip
>> them over from being non-voters to being voters? If doing this
>> increases our turnout from 300 voters to 9
I now maintain elektra, I will update it later after some bugs solved.
I will take this package for a while.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 00:01 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Nobody questions this. Thie issue in this thread is if we could find
> ways to make it simpler to enable these services.
Last I checked, the bugs already spoke about giving utilities the
ability to punch holes in the firewall and then close
On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:53:59PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
But anyway, if people feel really strongly about this, I think the opt out
of badge tracking is an okay approach. (Even if it makes more checkboxes.)
I find it hard to agree that forcing people
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 17:08:49 -0700,
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Nope. Fedmsg is what we're using to carry information about events (for
instance, $username voted in $election). Badges consumes the information
from fedmsg looking for particular events that it awards badges for. So
disabling b
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:31:12 +0200
Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1].
>
> During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that
> adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstream dev is very patient
> and willing to help
On 09/11/2013 12:31 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1].
During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that
adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstream dev is very patient
and willing to help me, but I feel I have wasted
72 matches
Mail list logo
