Hello guys,
I have recently joined the Red Hat Security Technologies Team,
here in Brno, to help co-maintain pyOpenSSL and authconfig packages
(besides other responsibilities in the team).
I have previously worked for Red Hat Security Response Team, so some
of you might know me already due to
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:57:27 +0200, Ken Dreyer
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Norvald Ryeng
wrote:
If you want us to do more, please say so. We're happy to help out.
Thanks for extending the offer. Would you mind commenting on the
mysql-workbench issues too? As Remi's pointed o
Hello Jan!! Congratulations!! Welcome to Fedora Community! :)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have recently joined the Red Hat Security Technologies Team,
> here in Brno, to help co-maintain pyOpenSSL and authconfig packages
> (besides other responsi
On 08/28/2013 12:46 AM, poma wrote:
> On 19.08.2013 20:46, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>> - What are the advantages of having the driver built-in, as compared to
>>> simply ensuring that it's always included in the initramfs?
>>>
>>
>> per
Dear Fedora Packagers,
when renaming a package, _please_ verify that the Obsoletes tag you add to
a package specifies a high enough version.
Make sure the new package really replaces the last published build of the
old package. Pay extra attention to our dist tag. It is part of the
Release value.
On 08/25/2013 01:17 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> It seems that the following packages are stil mentioned in f20 or
> f21 comps (I do not know which I checked) but are not in the i686 repo.
> At least some of these packages are arch specific:
>
> ant-scripts
ant-scripts fixed.
Thanks,
--
Mikolaj Izdeb
Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be build rpm w/o/
Fedora patches, changelogs, etc. simple rpms w/ one command.
We will use "utilityn
On 08/27/2013 11:20 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:54 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
>> Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms
>> support and at the *same time* adopt the policy
>>
>> "From this point forward only graphics driver that
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
> request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
Perhaps the guidelines should be more clear, then. (No, I don't have
a specific proposal.)
[Sorry this is late -- should have sent yesterday. This is for _today_.]
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTC
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:13:09AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> Sorry to come out of left field like this, but would the system profile
> info we collect on install be useful in determining the weight of the
> need for some of these drivers? For example, if there is still a bunch
> of SIS v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I wanted to let everyone know that as of last night all of the buildvm
builders were moved from RHEL 6 to Fedora 19. We do still have some
rhel6 builders.
Dennis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAl
# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2013-08-28
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Apologies on the late announcement but it's time for the next exciting
installment of "F20 alpha blocker bug review hour(s)"
We'll be running th
Greeting,
I just found out this list and subscribe to it. my subscription is new.
Pypy2.1 is now released. I see repo has pypy 2.0.2 as latest. Can I request
this is updated for 2.1? also, I wonder if someone has made shared library for
pypy sandboxing, for 2.0.2. when I looked at it, it does n
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:46:31AM +0200, poma wrote:
> Any links/docs to offer on this topic?
> Thanks.
>
I don't have a link off-hand, but a book about computer architecture
should let you figure things out:
At what level of detail? The kernel attempts to map itself using
2MB pages on X86 wher
If two packages 'provide' the same dependency, isn't yum supposed to
pick the one with the shortest name?
Anyway, 'BuildRequires: kernel' in Rawhide (on koji) picks
'kernel-debug' instead of 'kernel'. Is there a way to make it pick
'kernel' instead?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Grou
On 08/28/2013 10:42 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to let everyone know that as of last night all of the buildvm
> builders were moved from RHEL 6 to Fedora 19. We do still have some
> rhel6 builders.
>
> Dennis
> -BEGIN P
On 08/28/2013 05:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I wanted to let everyone know that as of last night all of the buildvm
builders were moved from RHEL 6 to Fedora 19. We do still have some
rhel6 builders.
Hum... a question, or perhaps more lik
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:21:06 -0400
Jay Greguske wrote:
> Are the buildvm builders the bare-metal image builders?
No, as the name would suggest they are virtual instances. ;)
The buildvmhosts are still rhel6, but the virtual instances/buildvm's
are now Fedora 19 (to match up with the Fedora 19
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:22:57 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hum... a question, or perhaps more like two:
>
> Are you planning to move the remaining RHEL-6 builders to Fedora too,
> and if so, is this (builders running on Fedora ~latest) going to be a
> permament arrangement?
Quite possibly. L
I think the most practical thing is to build version N of self-hosting
systems using version N-1 (in addition to supporting building N with N).
If you are using the latest to build the latest, you can more easily get
into unstable states.
For example, if a new version of the Fedora kernel broke vi
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:13:58PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> If two packages 'provide' the same dependency, isn't yum supposed to
> pick the one with the shortest name?
>
> Anyway, 'BuildRequires: kernel' in Rawhide (on koji) picks
> 'kernel-debug' instead of 'kernel'. Is there a way
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:41:31 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
> I think the most practical thing is to build version N of self-hosting
> systems using version N-1 (in addition to supporting building N with
> N). If you are using the latest to build the latest, you can more
> easily get into unstable st
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
> > request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
>
> Perhaps the guideline
I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
to figure out how to enable devtoolset in the spec file. If I run 'scl
enable devtoolset-1.1 bash' before doing rpmbuild it works, but how do
I run a command lik
Le 28/08/2013 18:09, Dave Johansen a écrit :
> I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
> rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
> to figure out how to enable devtoolset in the spec file. If I run 'scl
> enable devtoolset-1.1 bash' before do
On 2013-08-28 18:09, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
to figure out how to enable devtoolset in the spec file. If I run 'scl
enable devtoolset-1.1 bash' before doing rpmbu
On 08/28/2013 10:41 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:13:09AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
>> Sorry to come out of left field like this, but would the system profile
>> info we collect on install be useful in determining the weight of the
>> need for some of these drivers?
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, August 28th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji
4
On 08/28/2013 07:23 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
> I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
> and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be build rpm w/o/
> Fedora patches, changelogs, et
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 10:13 -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> Sorry to come out of left field like this, but would the system profile
> info we collect on install be useful in determining the weight of the
> need for some of these drivers? For example, if there is still a bunch
> of SIS video a
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Le 28/08/2013 18:09, Dave Johansen a écrit :
> > I'm trying to make a spec file that uses the devtoolset in RHEL 5/6 (
> > rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0175.html ) but I haven't been able
> > to figure out how to enable devtoolset in the s
On 08/27/2013 07:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said:
>> I'd like to be able to commit to master, check out the f20 branch, and
>> 'git cherry-pick master'.
>
> Is that really that much difference than git diff | sed | patch?
I believe it is, yes. Relying on
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 00:01 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 07:23 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
> > I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
> > and I have IMHO good idea to write u
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-08-29 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-08-29 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-08-29 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-08-29 1
The following packages are currently retired but other packages depend
on them. Since the packages are not yet blocked in koji, this is not
very visible. Nevertheless, the packages need new maintainers or the
depending packages need to drop dependencies on them.
Remarks:
- There are no recursive d
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> The following packages are currently retired but other packages depend
> on them. Since the packages are not yet blocked in koji, this is not
> very visible. Nevertheless, the packages need new maintainers or the
> depending packages need
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-08-28/fedora-meeting-1.2013-08-28-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1
On 28 August 2013 14:53, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
> I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
> and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be build rpm w/o/
> Fedora patches, changelogs,
> On 20 August 2013 13:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> That shouldn't really be an issue for the most part. It would only
>> impact you if you're hitting issues in an area where the config
>> options differ between releases, and those are fairly uncommon. You
>> can try using koji bisect to start w
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:26:58PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
> meeting Thursday at 2013-08-29 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Local time information (via. rktime):
>
> 2013-08-29 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
> python-quantumclient orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec, gkotton,
>markmc, rkukura
> Depending on: python-quantumclient
> openstack-quantum (maintained by: rkukura, itamarjp, otherwiseguy,
> mmagr, josecastroleon, vaneldik, pbrady, rackerjoe, apevec, chri
On 28.08.2013 16:57, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:46:31AM +0200, poma wrote:
>> Any links/docs to offer on this topic?
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> I don't have a link off-hand, but a book about computer architecture
> should let you figure things out:
>
> At what level of detail? The k
On 28.08.2013 15:14, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 12:46 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 19.08.2013 20:46, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
- What are the advantages of having the driver built-in, as compared to
simply ensuring that it'
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Where's the code? The github link seems to be broken.
Sorry for the delay on that. The code is now here:
https://github.com/tchollingsworth/ttname
And it's already in Rawhide, F20, and F18-19 updates-testing.
See the announcement here
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 20 August 2013 13:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>>>
>>> That shouldn't really be an issue for the most part. It would only
>>> impact you if you're hitting issues in an area where the config
>>> options differ between releases, and those are fai
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
> I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
> and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that will be build rpm w/o/
> Fedora patches, chan
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 32- and 64-bit Desktop Lives, the
32-bit MATE and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are
over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information,
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 10:29 +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>
> > Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but
> > I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM
> > and I have IMHO good idea to w
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:32:19AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > python-quantumclient orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec, gkotton,
> >markmc, rkukura
> > Depending on: python-quantumclient
> > openstack-quantum (maintained by: rkukura, itamarjp, otherwis
On 08/28/2013 06:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:22:57 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hum... a question, or perhaps more like two:
Are you planning to move the remaining RHEL-6 builders to Fedora too,
and if so, is this (builders running on Fedora ~latest) going to be a
permame
Design software is a special interest group intended to package and
maintain software for design team.
It was born to fill the need to include design related tools unavailable
in Fedora repository.
The following mission is to
- Maintain the Design group in the comps.xml,
- Promote more the Desi
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:56:28AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:32:19AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > python-quantumclient orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec,
> > > gkotton,
> > >markmc, rkukura
> > > Depending on: python-quantumclient
On 29 August 2013 01:53, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Just to follow up, thanks, your instructions for building worked fine
>> (I'd worried it wouldn't be so straightforward). Thought I'd best
>> mention koji-bisect doesn't seem to exist anymore (in c
54 matches
Mail list logo
