On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 07:54:38PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mar 23 juillet 2013 19:26, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> > AFAICS it shouldn't be too hard to script up something so this would
> > as easy as `fixfontmd --copyright "$(head -n3 LICENSE)" --licensedesc
> > "$(cat LICENSE)" -
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:22:10PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 07/16/2013 12:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
> >
> > Can we please use a different name, like "webd
I noticed this:
$ rpm -qf /usr/etc
filesystem-3.2-12.fc19.x86_64
$ repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/etc/*'
mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.x86_64
mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.i686
Since when do we have /usr/etc, and what is it for?
Maybe I am the only one but I see very little benefit in introducing
2013/8/4 Lennart Poettering
> I noticed this:
>
> $ rpm -qf /usr/etc
> filesystem-3.2-12.fc19.x86_64
>
> $ repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/etc/*'
> mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.x86_64
> mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.i686
>
> Since when do we have /usr/etc, and what is it for?
>
> Maybe I am the onl
On 08/04/2013 01:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I noticed this:
$ rpm -qf /usr/etc
filesystem-3.2-12.fc19.x86_64
$ repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/etc/*'
mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.x86_64
mirall-common-0:1.3.0-1.fc19.i686
Since when do we have /usr/etc, and what is it for?
Maybe I am the o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991808
Don't install kernel-3.11.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc20. The
/boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc20.x86_64 file is 0 bytes long.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwm
On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0
Hi
Hydra license has changed from 'GPLv3 with exceptions' to 'AGPLv3 with
exceptions'.
Thanks.
-- Athmane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013
>
> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build)
> DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>> On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>> > Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noar
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:06:58 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Paul Howarth
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> >> On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> >> > Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 U
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:16:01 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991808
>
> Don't install kernel-3.11.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc20. The
> /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc20.x86_64 file is 0 bytes long.
I'm pretty sure this is due to a failure to sign th
On Aug 4, 2013 5:20 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:16:01 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991808
> >
> > Don't install kernel-3.11.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc20. The
> > /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc20.x86_64 file is 0 byt
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 17:47:53 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> Do you have logs showing a failure? Send them my way if so. I'll
> look when I get in front of a computer again. Thanks.
I've added what I found to the bug.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> The guideline should be to ask upstream to fix the meta data. In case of
> missing license text (e.g. source code with a GPL header but no copy of
> the GPL itself), it is also upstream's task to fix it and the packager's
> to ask for it. And if u
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 13:16 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I noticed this:
>
> $ rpm -qf /usr/etc
> filesystem-3.2-12.fc19.x86_64
A quick git annotate shows it originates from:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/filesystem.git/commit/?id=cd01d2d6d54f59ef8e177d0391bc734fba470ef4
With no comm
All my peel packages are failed because of the magic Requires is for 5.16,
not 5.18.
Don't know why.
Sent from S3
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Il 03/08/2013 07:07, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
Hi all,
I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild.
You can see the current list of failures[1] and list to be built[2].
Both lists are updated every 5 minutes. at the end of the initial run
though we will file bugs for all FTBFS. Pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to the addition of arm and its 48 builders the releng pass
though on the mass rebuild is done.
for a comparison to f19
f19:
Feb 13: 1096
Feb 14: 1445
Feb 15: 1548
Feb 16: 2175
Feb 17: 1168
Feb 18: 1476
Feb 19: 2
f20:
Aug 02:1261
Aug 03:70
Many Perl packages has wrong Requires of 5.16, and because of this I
cannot update installed perl on my system to 5.18.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not
presented in armv7 arch.
When will this macro be available?
Thanks.
[1]--http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9145/5709145/build.log
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Always playing in Fedora Project
http://cicku.
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:56:06 +0800
Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not
> presented in armv7 arch.
>
> When will this macro be available?
This macro is defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.systemd which is
provided by the 'systemd' p
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 22:39:55 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:56:06 +0800
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not
> > presented in armv7 arch.
> >
> > When will this
On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
Dennis
Do you have also numbers how many FTBFS we had in F19 and F20? It might
be good for post mortem of Fedora rebuilds.
I thought the rebuild should start after all tasks wer
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
>> addressed.
>>
>> Dennis
>
>
> Do you have also numbers how many FTBFS we had in F19 and F20? It might be
> good for post mortem
26 matches
Mail list logo
