On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Whether this is a blocker or not comes down to a judgement call, because
> it hinges on whether this is a significant inconvenience for a large
> enough number of users. So we need to know from people who use Fedora in
> remote auth enviro
Hi,
I am willing to and already have done package reviews specially in sugar
activities. I am using fedora-review tool and there, mock needs to
download a number of packages which will add up to around 150-200 MB.
Those files will be downloaded each time that I run fedora-review. I have
limited
About ffmpeg, a Debian's user say:
> "This package contains the deprecated ffmpeg program. This package
> also serves as a transitional package to libav-tools. Users are
> advised to use avconv from the libav-tools package instead of ffmpeg.
>
> Libav is a complete, cross-platform solution to dec
Dne 3.6.2013 19:04, Dan Mashal napsal(a):
What is a system wide change vs a self contained change vs a new change?
That is good question. I was always against distinguishing between these
two, but
For example, if there will be new release of Ruby, I am going to propose
them as a "self
On 04/06/13 08:26, Dario Lesca wrote:
> About ffmpeg, a Debian's user say:
>
>> "This package contains the deprecated ffmpeg program. This package
>> also serves as a transitional package to libav-tools. Users are
>> advised to use avconv from the libav-tools package instead of ffmpeg.
>>
>> Libav
> Basically, we (as in, the people who do blocker review) need to know if
> remote auth at install/firstboot time is really important. Once we know
> that, we can go out and get the blocker decisions against anaconda, i-s,
> g-i-s, whatever else correct. Just trust us, and answer the initial
> ques
may be you can use a test server if available
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am willing to and already have done package reviews specially in sugar
> activities. I am using fedora-review tool and there, mock needs to
> download a number of packages which
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Whether this is a blocker or not comes down to a judgement call, because
>> it hinges on whether this is a significant inconvenience for a large
>> enough number of users. So we ne
On Mon, 03.06.13 12:36, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> These submissions are mostly anonymized (some people put their names
> or enough details in the abstracts to make it obvious who the proposed
> speakers were). This is intentional, as we are trying to eliminate an
> area of potent
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:19:01 +0800
Danishka Navin wrote:
> may be you can use a test server if available
Please, don't top post
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Proper_posting_style).
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I
Hello list!
As I have a pkg (git-extras, currently in review) which `BuildRequires:
rubygem-ronn` I need to have `BuildRequires: groff-base`, too, for
having the manpages build properly.
See build-log without groff-base:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5463867
See build-log wi
Il giorno mar, 04/06/2013 alle 09.07 +0100, Jamie Nguyen ha scritto:
> On 04/06/13 08:26, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > About ffmpeg, a Debian's user say:
> >
> >> "This package contains the deprecated ffmpeg program. This package
> >> also serves as a transitional package to libav-tools. Users are
> >>
2013/6/4 Lennart Poettering
>
> This sounds seriously misguided. I mean, I usually prefer attending
> talks where I know that the presenter is actually involved in the
> respective project, rather than just any random guy/gal.
>
> I am all for levelling the playing field, but things like this sou
Just filed a bug against rubygem-ronn:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970537
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Miro,
thanks for good mail.
I will try to explain some things regarding Developer Assistant.
Primary we want to implement just GitHub but we decided to implement
OpenShift during the developing phase as well.
Current focus is mainly GitHub and OpenShift (in future).
More things have to be ha
Compose started at Tue Jun 4 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.3-0.1.rc2.fc20.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.8.0-8.fc20
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:53 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > As things stand, in Fedora 19, it's basically impossible to configure
> > remote authentication from the install/firstboot process. If you want to
> > use remote auth, you'd
Compose started at Tue Jun 4 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bochs]
bochs-2.6.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires vgabios
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) >=
0:0.0.18
[d
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of the
> bikeshedding machine :)
>
> We had https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965883 on the list of
> release blocker candidates that we evaluated at the blocker revi
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:19 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Basically, we (as in, the people who do blocker review) need to know if
> > remote auth at install/firstboot time is really important. Once we know
> > that, we can go out and get the blocker decisions against anaconda, i-s,
> > g-i-s, wh
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Tomas Radej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:19:01 +0800
> Danishka Navin wrote:
>
> > may be you can use a test server if available
>
I'll manage with the cache for the time being.
>
> Please, don't top post
> (
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of
> the bikeshedding machine :)
>
> We had https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965883 on the
> list of release blocker candidates t
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of
> > the bikeshedding machine :)
> >
> > We had https://bugzilla.red
On 06/04/2013 04:28 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 03.06.13 12:36, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> These submissions are mostly anonymized (some people put their names
>> or enough details in the abstracts to make it obvious who the proposed
>> speakers were). This is inten
On Tue, 04.06.13 09:46, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 04:28 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 03.06.13 12:36, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >> These submissions are mostly anonymized (some people put their names
> >> or enough details in the a
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Fedora Branched Report
wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Jun 4 09:15:03 UTC 2013
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [libreatlas]
> libreatlas-1.0.0a-3.fc19.x86_64 requires librasterlite.so.0()(64bit)
> [l
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 3.6.2013 19:04, Dan Mashal napsal(a):
>
>> What is a system wide change vs a self contained change vs a new change?
>
>
> That is good question. I was always against distinguishing between these
> two, but
>
> For example, if there wil
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 10:16:22 -0400
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 10:02 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > On 06/04/2013 09:55 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> What's even weirder is that some folks are explicitly mentioned
> >> (such as Jon Masters) in the descriptions, so the playing field
On 06/04/2013 10:02 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 06/04/2013 09:55 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What's even weirder is that some folks are explicitly mentioned (such as
Jon Masters) in the descriptions, so the playing field isn't actually
that levelled after all?
Only people who refer to themsel
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of the
bikeshedding machine :)
We had https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965883 on the list of
release blocker candidates that we evaluated at the blocker review
meeting this mor
On 06/04/2013 09:55 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> What's even weirder is that some folks are explicitly mentioned (such as
> Jon Masters) in the descriptions, so the playing field isn't actually
> that levelled after all?
Only people who refer to themselves by name in their own abstracts (or
des
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 3.6.2013 19:04, Dan Mashal napsal(a):
>>
>>> What is a system wide change vs a self contained change vs a new change?
>>
>>
>> That is good question. I was always against distinguishing
On 06/04/2013 02:26 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
('winbind crashed with no error messages; restart it; oops crashed
again; restart samba maybe; YAY, success, don't touch anything')
Pre systemd winbind/samba migration or after systemd winbind/migration (
which means we might need to fix somethi
On 06/04/2013 10:28 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 06/04/2013 02:26 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
('winbind crashed with no error messages; restart it; oops crashed
again; restart samba maybe; YAY, success, don't touch anything')
Pre systemd winbind/samba migration or after systemd winbi
Hello,
in the process of making ABRT aware of MiniDebugInfo[1] through the
libunwind library, I noticed that the MiniDebugInfo files in Fedora 19
(F18 too) have different ELF program header tables than the
corresponding binaries and separate debuginfo files:
$ eu-readelf -l /usr/bin/cat
Progra
Hello,
I have a package that builds fine in a fresh rawhide mock chroot and not in
a koji build. Is there any difference between the two?
Here is the error in Koji:
+ make -j5 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64 -f makefile docs
rm -f doc/crypt.pdf *.dvi *.log *.aux *.toc *.idx *.ilg *.ind *.out
echo "hello" > c
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:52:14 +0200
Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a package that builds fine in a fresh rawhide mock chroot and
> not in a koji build. Is there any difference between the two?
>
> Here is the error in Koji:
>
> + make -j5 LIBPATH=/usr/lib64 -f makefile docs
> rm -f do
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:22:50AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I disagree - this lets people judge proposed talks/sessions on what is
> written.
I don't go to presentations because of the quality of the abstract. I go
to presentations based on whether or not I believe the speaker is
competent i
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Only people who refer to themselves by name in their own abstracts (or
> describe themselves in such a way that it is obvious who they are) ended
> up like this. We honestly didn't think that was going to happen.
>
> This was an experiment. If
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:06 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Whether this is a blocker or not comes down to a judgement call, because
> > it hinges on whether this is a significant inconvenience for a large
> > enough number of users. So
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 08:43 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of the
> > bikeshedding machine :)
> >
> > We had https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965883 on the list of
> >
On 06/04/2013 08:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:22:50AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
>> I disagree - this lets people judge proposed talks/sessions on what is
>> written.
>
> I don't go to presentations because of the quality of the abstract. I go
> to presentations ba
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:26 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> For what it's worth, remote authentication is increasingly important
> where I sit, so everything that makes it easier to set up is welcome. As
> of now, my cheat sheet for older Fedoras and RHEL is several pages long
> and involves
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:51 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am willing to and already have done package reviews specially in
> sugar activities. I am using fedora-review tool and there, mock needs
> to download a number of packages which will add up to around 150-200
> MB. Those f
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is compulsory that a package waiting to be reviewed, be submitted with
> the latest version in upstream?
It cannot be. the latest version upstream sometimes includes a major
and invompatible structure with the preivous major r
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 07:23 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 3.6.2013 19:04, Dan Mashal napsal(a):
> >
> >> What is a system wide change vs a self contained change vs a new change?
> >
> >
> > That is good question. I was always against disting
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:05 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:52:14 +0200
> Simone Caronni wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a package that builds fine in a fresh rawhide mock chroot and
> > not in a koji build. Is there any difference between the two?
> >
> > Here is the error
On 06/04/2013 05:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:51 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
Hi,
I am willing to and already have done package reviews specially in
sugar activities. I am using fedora-review tool and there, mock needs
to download a number of packages which will
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
I'll be missing tomorrow's meeting. I'll log any comments I may have
in the tickets.
josh
--
devel
49 matches
Mail list logo
