Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 2013-05-23, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 05/23/2013 09:34 AM, James Antill wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:55 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> I'll get more specific then: >>> >>> python-pyface can use two different graphics backends - either wxPython or >>> pyQt4. In no way do these two

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 2013-05-22, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 05/22/2013 04:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 23:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> Still, I don't see how that's really worth doing instead of just using a >> virtual provide. The OP's reasoning for not using a virtual provi

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

Dne Čt 23. května 2013 11:54:04, john.flor...@dart.biz napsal(a): > > From: pmati...@laiskiainen.org > > > > On 05/23/2013 06:09 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > > And even though I have to give rpmbuild a tarball, I don't > > > believe it ever reuses it "as is". My understanding is that the

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 08:03 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Do you know virtual packages are forbidden in Fedora? Sorry, I just scanned through the guidelines and didn't see this anywhere. Do you mind citing a reference, please? Thanks, Jonathan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

Dne Čt 23. května 2013 18:05:40, Till Maas napsal(a): > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > On 23. 5. 2013 at 13:52:39, Simone Caronni wrote: > > > I fiddle around with a new Nagios installation, then something stops > > > working. I'm pretty sure it is some modification

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

Dne Čt 23. května 2013 16:41:04, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 23.5.2013 16:29, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a): > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Vít Ondruch > > > > wrote: > > *It is not possible to convert the packages technically nor > > philosophically* > >

Re: About volatile udev directory

On 05/23/2013 11:46 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I've found the following in Fedora 18 [root@mpinode02 sergio]# LANG=C ls /run/udev/rules.d ls: cannot access /run/udev/rules.d: No such file or directory I haven't found anything in the changelog about a change about it, is there no more that director

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 05/24/2013 10:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 24.05.2013 07:08, schrieb Ralf Corsepius: By doing "yum reinstall nagios" I don't have the the default config files (i.e. nagios.cfg.rpmnew is not created). This happens only on upgrades. yum remove yum install should do what you want (backu

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 2013-05-24, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 08:03 +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> Do you know virtual packages are forbidden in Fedora? > > Sorry, I just scanned through the guidelines and didn't see this > anywhere. Do you mind citing a reference, please? > Well it's probably not f

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 05/24/2013 01:37 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2013-05-24, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 08:03 +, Petr Pisar wrote: Do you know virtual packages are forbidden in Fedora? Sorry, I just scanned through the guidelines and didn't see this anywhere. Do you mind citing a referenc

rawhide report: 20130524 changes

Compose started at Fri May 24 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [ekiga] ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit) [good

F-19 Branched report: 20130524 changes

Compose started at Fri May 24 09:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubyge

Re: "Provides: icon-theme" for *-icon-theme packages

23.05.2013 14:20, Adam Williamson пишет: On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 13:55 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote: 16.05.2013 01:26, Orion Poplawski: On 05/15/2013 01:07 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote: 13.05.2013 19:30, Eugene Pivnev пишет: Subj. For packages that requies _any_ icon theme (something like oxygen provi

Re: Update libical to 1.0 in rawhide the next week (soname version bump)

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > there was a release of libical 1.0 recently [1], and I'd like to update > rawhide with it. It seems to be API compatible with 0.48, they only > bumped the soname version due to version jump to 1.0. Rex Dieter helped > me to fix a spec file to i

Re: Update libical to 1.0 in rawhide the next week (soname version bump)

On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 17:12 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > there was a release of libical 1.0 recently [1], and I'd like to update > > rawhide with it. It seems to be API compatible with 0.48, they only > > bumped the soname version due to versio

Re: [heads up] Abiword

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Ismael Olea wrote: > > Hi: > > While fixing sugar-write[1] I needed to update Abiword/libabiword to recent > versions[2]. I made this using a bunch of patches from SugarLabs, with > special interests in the gtk3 and instrospection ones. Please don't update this.

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:37 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2013-05-24, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 08:03 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> Do you know virtual packages are forbidden in Fedora? > > > > Sorry, I just scanned through the guidelines and didn't see this > > anywhere. D

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:36 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > 2013/5/22 Björn Persson : > > Jan Zelený wrote: > >> what are the changes that you would like to see in the foreseeable > >> future (say 2-3 years) and why would you like to see them (what would they > >> help you with)? > >

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 18:29 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Rpm >= 4.10 can automatically download remote sources and patches over > http and ftp, but since there's (currently) no way to verify downloaded > content the feature is disabled by default as its quite a security risk > to download ar

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 05/23/2013 09:10 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: TBH I'm not perfectly sure what causes the problem but since the new "multilib" in Ubuntu started I am dealing with a whole bunch of issues like the one I described. So to sum up, I personally think we are doing much better with the way how things work in

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 05/23/2013 07:08 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: Have you tried using dnf instead of yum? It is much faster. To be perfectly honest we don't plan to invest much effort in developing new things for yum, it will more and more shift towards maintenance mode and the focus will be on dnf. What does the "w

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Fri, 24 May 2013 15:15:30 -0400 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/23/2013 09:10 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: > > TBH I'm not perfectly sure what causes the problem but since the new > > "multilib" in Ubuntu started I am dealing with a whole bunch of > > issues like the one I described. So to sum up, I pe

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On 05/23/2013 07:52 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: I fiddle around with a new Nagios installation, then something stops working. I'm pretty sure it is some modifications in /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg but I cannot track it down. As an example I could do: mv /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg /etc/nagios/nagios.cfg.m

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:41:41PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > It was my understanding that arm is not going to do any multilib. > > aarch64 cannot run other stuff, so you cannot run armv7 or whatever on > a aarch64 box, it's just completely different. > > (I sure hope this is the case) Looks

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > We could of course build the smarts into the fedpkg layer - have some > fedpkg commands for checking out and building tarballs of SCM-hosted > content - but then you've just moved the security risk Panu mentioned to > that layer; if we do

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Friday 24 May 2013 13:41:41 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2013 15:15:30 -0400 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Not really. We are focusing only on the x86_64/x86 case and ignoring > > the broader problem which Debian has tackled. Jumping to the > > conclusion that because you had some multi-li

Re: About volatile udev directory

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 05/23/2013 11:46 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> >> I've found the following in Fedora 18 >> [root@mpinode02 sergio]# LANG=C ls /run/udev/rules.d >> ls: cannot access /run/udev/rules.d: No such file or directory >> >> I haven't found anythin

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

Hi, On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:08:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > A 'metapackage' is an actual package shipped in the repositories which > contains no files, and whose raison d'etre is to express some > dependencies. There are a few of these in Fedora, xorg-x11-drivers being > the classic exa

Re: Software Management call for RFEs

On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 08:36 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:08:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > A 'metapackage' is an actual package shipped in the repositories which > > contains no files, and whose raison d'etre is to express some > > dependencies. There are