On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >Hey list,
> >
> > In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
> >shipping directory in /mnt is prohibited. FHS seems to agree.
> >
> > owfs is suite of prog
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 05/04/2013 12:30 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:24:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>Matthew, with all due respect the tone of the bug doesn't make me think
> >>that there is a lot of interest in dis
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 12:03:39AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Anaconda has a pretty special place in this project. It is the
> uber-administrator of every new Fedora install. We would do better
> as a community to hash out major changes before they're made, and
> try to reach some agreement bef
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
Even if that is true, what is your point?
--
Regards,
Olav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 04/14/2013 03:34 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
-fstack-protector-all really is all. The default in Fedora is 4 bytes which
would cover cases where ints and char[] are interposed as in some networking
code. But more importantly, the defaul stack-protector only kicks in when the
object is a char arra
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
>
> Even if that is true, what is your point?
That
On Tue, 7 May 2013 09:12:33 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Fedora Koji Build System wrote:
> > Package: m4rie-20130416-1.fc19
> > Tag: f19-updates-candidate
> > Status: complete
> > Built by: pbrobinson
> > ID: 416696
> > Started: Tue, 07 May 2013 11:35:25 UTC
> > Fini
On 2013-05-08 09:32, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hey list,
In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
shipping directory in /mnt is prohibited. FHS seems to agree.
On Wed, 08.05.13 09:32, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > >Hey list,
> > >
> > > In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
> > >shipping dire
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
unmaintained.
(http://mm3test.fedoraproject.org/hyperkitty/list/de...@mm3test.fedoraproject.org/thread/BP7LYYNGQA2DDTNFNS3EJXX3AGNZRNAX/)
What's the current status of dietlibc in Fedora and how can it be checked?
Last b
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
> unmaintained.
> (
> http://mm3test.fedoraproject.org/hyperkitty/list/de...@mm3test.fedoraproject.org/thread/BP7LYYNGQA2DDTNFNS3EJXX3AGNZRNAX/
> )
>
> What's t
Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[cinnamon]
cinnamon-menu-editor-1.6.7-7.fc19.noarch requires gnome-panel
[d
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann <[1]fedora-de...@tuxad.de>
>wrote:
> Hello,
> I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
> unmaintained.
>
> ([2]http://mm3test.fedora
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann <[1]
> fedora-de...@tuxad.de>
> >wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > > make decisions and if you don't like it "
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-05-09 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-05-09 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-05-09 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-05-09 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2013-05-09 17:00
Dear all,
When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
3.8.8-202 x86_64 I have tons of errors like:
Add. Sense: No additional sense information
hv_storvsc vmbus_0_12: cmd 0x41 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
I believe it is related to WRITE_SAME don't implemented in win2012
server
On 5/8/13 9:21 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Dear all,
> When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
> 3.8.8-202 x86_64 I have tons of errors like:
>
> Add. Sense: No additional sense information
> hv_storvsc vmbus_0_12: cmd 0x41 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
>
> I believe it is re
Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes upstream?
Mario
On 8 May 2013 16:28, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/8/13 9:21 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
>> 3.8.8-20
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> I use mock to local build packages.
> I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
> How I fix it ?
> GEN gnome-control-center.1
> I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/curre
On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
>
> Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes upstream?
You can search in the git tree:
[root@host linux-2.6]# git log --pretty=oneline | grep "storvsc: avoid usage"
3e8f4f4065901c8dfc51407
Cool! thanks a lot!
On 8 May 2013 16:38, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
>>
>> Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes
>> upstream?
>
> You can search in the git tree:
>
> [root@host linux-2.6]#
Confirmed: kernel-3.9.1-0.rc1.201.fc18.x86_64 from koji fix this issue :)
On 8 May 2013 16:40, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Cool! thanks a lot!
>
>
> On 8 May 2013 16:38, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>>> Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
>>>
>>> Do you know if ther
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
08.05.2013 18:35 пользователь "Jerry James" написал:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > I use mock to local build packages.
> > I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
>
Am 07.05.2013 19:39, schrieb Ravindra Kumar:
>> and why?
>
> open-vm-tools are required for anything that requires
> co-ordination with the guest. Here are a few examples,
> clean shutdown of guest from VM management interface,
> guest consistent snapshots, collection/display of guest
> resource
Am 07.05.2013 19:48, schrieb Ravindra Kumar:
> If there are strong use cases that don't require that functionality
> then probably it makes sense to not be part of core, otherwise, I think
> it makes more sense to make open-vm-tools part of @core because sooner
> or later users will end up instal
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a quick search
on obvious terms through
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, May 8th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status update
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>
> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
> packages be buildable without internet access? I just h
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Fedora Branched Report
wrote:
> Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [byzanz]
> byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
> [cinnam
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-05-08)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 18:06:59 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-05-08/fesco.2013-05-08-18.06.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
Dear Fedora Community,
since I want to contribute to Fedora to make better and to become a
member of the packager-group, I'm going to introduce myself here a bit.
I am Björn Esser and I live in Hildesheim, Germany. That's about 30 km
(20 mi) south of Hannover. I'm just an ordinary guy using Linux
> > Compose finished at Wed May 8 12:20:02 UTC 2013
First please trim unneeded stuff from a reply.
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It was announced to the list as to why, it's dead upstream and doesn't
build with the current gnome and is in fact bro
On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It appears to be needed by only:
byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
gnome-applet-sensors - probably s
> *but* please undersatdn with your argumentation a lot of maintainers
> could claim that their packages are in CORE for several reasons
> because they are expected to be used from most users
> please leave core be what core means
> and as i clearly statet that i have open-vm-tools on nearly any
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-05-08/fedora-meeting-1.2013-05-08-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 16:22 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
>
> It appears to be needed by only:
> byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
> cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> It appears to be needed by only:
> byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
> cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
> gnome-applet-sensors - probably should be blocked.
> openbox - Should disable gdm
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
>
We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
gnome-panel. If you w
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
> that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
> gnome-panel. If you want to keep gnome-panel alive for some reason
> (although you already have
Hi
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>
> The new version of cinnamon does not depend on it. Fighting with it to
> get to compile. Thanks for your reply. There were some other packages
> though that seemed affected.. (i.e. openbox) and some gnome packages
> too.
>
Openbox has s
I spent a bit of time recently trying to clean up the oldest package
review tickets, making sure links are accessible and the submitted
packages actually build. At this point I think all of the tickets in
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html older than May
2012 should actually be
* Dan Mashal [08/05/2013 11:47] :
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
"gnome-panel and gnome-applets just got blocked [1] in koji. We still
have a number of packages depending on gnome-panel, either through
library deps or through Requires: gnome-panel, and all of
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:09:13 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > > make decisions and if you don't
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
longer active?
A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
B: Some people don't get to read mail every day, or more than a few or less
times a week.
A + B = perfectly
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> FOUR DAYS is "no longer active" for you? Seriously?
> You want to STFU those who disagree _this hard_?
Pete,
There is no constructive discussion going on here any more. 4 days is
certainly enough time for a mailing list thread to go inacti
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:25 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guideline
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>
>> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>
>
> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
> packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a qu
On 5/8/2013 10:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
>> packag
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
>
> > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> > longer active?
>
> A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
>
> B: Some people don't get to read mail ev
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:59 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>
> >> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guideline
Hi
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
> was actually written down in the guidelines somewhere.
>
It is not written down as policy and since the tools themselves enforce
this, I don't think it has b
Huh! Today this problem not present..
--
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
09.05.2013 8:12 пользователь "Rahul Sundaram" написал:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
>> was actually written
On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
> you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> longer active?
A: The thread was started on a Frid
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 00:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
>
> >> > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thr
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:24:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > owfs is suite of program for accessing 1-wire network, which is
> > > >simple hardware protocol. One of the program is FUSE module,
> > > >giving the access to network and devices on it through filesystem.
> > > >The "/m
Hi Bill and others,
Based on the earlier discussions in the emails, I have following diff for
comps-f19.xml.in:
--- comps-f19.xml.in 2013-04-29 17:41:10.003026000 -0700
+++ comps-f19.xml.in.new 2013-05-08 20:35:57.000112000 -0700
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
<_description>Local X.org display server
fal
On 02/05/13 05:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 20:26:13 -0400,
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bill Nottingham writes:
Anyway, here are my suggestions:
valgrind
eclipse
gimp
kdegames
I don't think gimp is that great of a choice to drop. That's a tool
that I think some of the
58 matches
Mail list logo
