Re: audacity

2013-05-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/30/2013 10:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and 19. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132 That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest version. Thanks! Regards, Hans -- devel maili

Re: audacity

2013-05-01 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/29/2013 05:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. This is not true for at least Fedora, I've pingened the maintainer (David Timms) about the 2.0.3 update in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.red

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-01 Thread Eugene Pivnev
Whether I have to create bugreports? BTW - gvfs requires as libsecret as libgnome-keyring. 30.04.2013 21:50, Matthias Clasen: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 19:38 +0400, Eugene A. Pivnev wrote: 30.04.2013 19:26, David Howells: Eugene Pivnev wrote: 3. rpm -qa | grep gnome | xargs sudo yum remove * gi

Re: fedora release name problem

2013-05-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 14:44 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 03/20/2013 07:23 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 09:27 +0100, Christof Damian wrote: > >> Fixing them now will benefit all future releases and all the people > >> living in non pure ASCII countries. > > > > ∄ pure

Re: Self introduction, and maintaining MySQL package

2013-05-01 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:08:08 +0200, Bjorn Munch wrote: > Since I do not yet have a sponsor, I cannot upload to > fedorapeople.org. That is misinformation. Note the bottom of the following paragraph: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Upload_Your_Package > Re

Re: Avoid a 32 bits package from being pushed into 64 bits repository

2013-05-01 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:47:24 +0200, Alejandro Alvarez Ayllon wrote: > Hello, > > I co-maintain a package that contains a library that is used as module > for a server. > The 32 bits version of this library is pushed automatically into the 64 > bits repositories (i.e. in epel6), That's because

rawhide report: 20130501 changes

2013-05-01 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed May 1 08:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [dogtag-pki] dogtag-pki-10.0.2-1.fc20.noarch requires pki-tools >=

GSoC'13 Proposal

2013-05-01 Thread ajay kulkarni
Hi, I have submitted my GSoC proposal. It can be found in the link http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/ajay143kulkarni/1# and my application at fedora wiki page is in the link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ajaykulkarni Please have a look :) -- You

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

2013-05-01 Thread Andre Robatino
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3). As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.o

Re: fedora release name problem

2013-05-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:17:46 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I see you're a Thunderbird user. Does it have the same option that Evolution does, to ignore abusive Reply-To: settings on mailing lists? If you use maildrop filtering, you can have it strip reply-to headers from messages sent

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

2013-05-01 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:19:50PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > More information is available at: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenID I hope that nobody used that until now, otherwise I am disappointed that nobody noticed before me that Firefox does not properly validate https://id.fe

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-05-01)

2013-05-01 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:37:03AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, > e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during > the open floor topic.

Removal of pipe sink and source modules from Fedora pulse packages

2013-05-01 Thread Jeremy White
Hi Lennart, In this thread: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-June/004215.html You express that the module-pipe-sink is a toy, and can't be used for anything useful, and that you're going to remove it from the Fedora packages. And, indeed, it has been removed from th

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-05-01)

2013-05-01 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:21:26PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:37:03AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to > > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, > > e-mail me directly, or b

Fedora ARM Weekly Status Meeting 2013-05-01

2013-05-01 Thread Paul Whalen
Good day all, Please join us today (Wednesday, May 1st) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC) for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. On the agenda so far.. 0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting 1) Problem packages 2) Kernel Status update

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-05-01)

2013-05-01 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > Apologies, it was pointed out to me that the listed local time didn

Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875494] X.509: Cert 81941e8b9ea74f946d7e18b59d61deb5423e411e is not yet valid Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875496] MODSIGN: Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate (-129) Apr 25 21:19:08 localhost kernel: [0.875445] X.509: Cert 81941e8b9e

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

2013-05-01 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 01 May 2013 11:15:30 AM EDT, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:19:50PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> More information is available at: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenID > > I hope that nobody used that until no

Python reviews needed

2013-05-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
I have some python packages that need reviewing: python-traitsui - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829580 python-envisage - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958523 There may be more to come in the dep chain as well. These are needed to repair the broken Mayavi visualizat

Re: Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
On 1 May 2013 19:13, Aaron Gray wrote: > Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875494] X.509: Cert > 81941e8b9ea74f946d7e18b59d61deb5423e411e is not yet valid > Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875496] MODSIGN: Problem loading > in-kernel X.509 certificate (-129) > Apr 25 21:19:08 loca

Re: Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
Actual message "Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate" On 1 May 2013 19:25, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 1 May 2013 19:13, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> Apr 25 21:14:09 localhost kernel: [0.875494] X.509: Cert >> 81941e8b9ea74f946d7e18b59d61deb5423e411e is not yet valid >> Apr 25 21:14:09 localho

Re: Have I been hacked or is there a vmlinuz-3.8.9-200.fc18.i686.PAE - X.509 error

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
On 1 May 2013 19:38, Aaron Gray wrote: > Actual message "Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate" > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=861322 Sorry for the noise, should have checked bugzilla ! Aaron > > > On 1 May 2013 19:25, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> On 1 May

Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-05-01)

2013-05-01 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-05-01) === Meeting started by abadger1999 at 18:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-05-01/fesco.2013-05-01-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-01 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 11:46 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote: > Whether I have to create bugreports? Creating patches would be more interesting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
The F19 DVD is currently *way* over size. (i686: 417MB, x86_64: 311MB). That's almost certainly more than can be fixed by trimming around the edges; we need to remove actual functionality that's on the DVD. Options include: 1) One/some of the desktops F19 DVD currently includes - GNOME - KDE - X

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Aaron Gray
Yes I noticed that. One possibility would to so a separate server based distro like Ubuntu does, and maybe a developer one too ? Just a thought. On 1 May 2013 21:03, Bill Nottingham wrote: > The F19 DVD is currently *way* over size. (i686: 417MB, x86_64: 311MB). > That's almost certainly more t

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Dan Mashal
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > The F19 DVD is currently *way* over size. (i686: 417MB, x86_64: 311MB). > That's almost certainly more than can be fixed by trimming around the > edges; we need to remove actual functionality that's on the DVD. > > Options include: > > 1) On

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) said: > I think we should look at package dependencies. It seems that lots of > unnecessary packages are being pulled when composing media. Here's everything new in the F19 DVD, sorted by size. I've dropped java-1.8.0-openjdk in the kickstart already, but that wo

gnome-panel removal

2013-05-01 Thread Kalev Lember
Hi, gnome-panel and gnome-applets just got blocked [1] in koji. We still have a number of packages depending on gnome-panel, either through library deps or through Requires: gnome-panel, and all of these are going to show up as broken deps with the next rawhide and F19 composes. (They were in a b

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/01/2013 04:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) said: >> I think we should look at package dependencies. It seems that >> lots of unnecessary packages are being pulled when composing >> media. > > Here's everything n

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Dan Mashal
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) said: >> I think we should look at package dependencies. It seems that lots of >> unnecessary packages are being pulled when composing media. > > Here's everything new in the F19 DVD, sorted by size. I've dr

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Ben Cotton
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > gnome-getting-started-docs.noarch <-- is this really needed? Why > doesn't Gnome 3 get docs online or something? > It's entirely possible that someone who is downloading the DVD image intends to install on a machine that doesn't have a consisten

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Robert Relyea
> Thunderbird is new? Drop it. Hardly new since I've been using it on Fedora for 8 years now. bob smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel