Dne 10.4.2013 18:03, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:22 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Why is it 7 days? It used to by 3 days in this period of release
cycle, if I remember correctly. Was there some change?
Nope. Just a mistake. ;)
The pre-beta status wasn't updated everywhere, an
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Daniel Kopecek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 04/10/2013 09:20 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm (co-/) maintainer of mod_security, I noticed that the owner
> >orphaned
> >it and then retired it, obviously I can't take it over. [1]
> >
> >I'm kindly as
Hi Athmane,
I'm sorry for this inconvenience. You see, it was not my aim to retire
mod_security.
I decided to move my ownership to Daniel since I was not an active
maintainer. I believe Daniel will be more helpful and responsive than
me. He just needs to improve his mouse control a bit. ;)
Paul Wouters wrote:
> Why does the _hardened_build macro for the spec file use "-z,relro" and not
> "-z,relro,-z,now" ?
Huh? As far as I can see _hardened_build adds -z now, not relro.
-Wl,-z,relro is supposed to be included in LDFLAGS. Or has this changed
recently?
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Compose started at Thu Apr 11 08:15:21 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[amide]
amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit
On 05/04 23.18, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 08:06 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote:
> >
> > How do we get push access to the git repo? It would be great to get
> > 5.6 in before the test day on April 30.
> >
>
> About updating:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
>
> and how to joi
Le Mer 10 avril 2013 22:52, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:55:59PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Disable /tmp on tmpfs?
>
> I have suggested this should be done automatically in RAM-limited
> situations (primarily for VMs):
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Mer 10 avril 2013 22:52, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:55:59PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> Disable /tmp on tmpfs?
> >
> > I have suggested this should be done automatically in RAM-limited
>
Compose started at Thu Apr 11 09:15:14 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 11 Apr 2013 02:56:16 AM EDT, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/11/2013 04:27 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:53:28AM -0400, Stephen Galla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 10 Apr 2013 05:34:48 PM EDT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 10/04/13 07:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Wed 10 Apr 2013 10:59:03 AM EDT, Tom Callaway wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924938
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.14.4-225.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.4-225.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947444
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.14.4-225.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.4-225.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
I run it virtualized right now with 1 Gig of RAM and default
configurations, which is not roomy with all the new eye candy and Gnome 3
environment but it's workable. Ripping out NetworkManager kicking and
screaming, and all the different "PackageKit" toolkits is helpful to
reducing the bloat down t
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu 11 Apr 2013 02:56:16 AM EDT, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 04/11/2013 04:27 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >>> On Wed,
7 days is way, way, way too long for an active repository such as any of
the currently supported Fedoras. And yes, it *is* burdensome to download
and keep updating all the time.
If running more than a few servers, I always maintain a local nightly
mirror and point my clients to that by default. Th
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951036
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Ver
Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc19.x86_64
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Joachim Backes wrote:
Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found.
It should be available in rpmfusion-nonfree.
rob
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:05:39 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I have the impression (which might be worng ;)) that this happens
> repetitively every release. So I'm wondering, if this step isn't
> under-documented in alpha freeze check-list, if something like that
> exists?
Yeah, we should add to do
Le Jeu 11 avril 2013 14:07, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le Mer 10 avril 2013 22:52, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
>> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:55:59PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >> Disable /tmp on tmpfs?
>> >
>> > I h
Some more thoughts on possibly hardening more by default - comments and
corrections very welcome.
(I'll call "mutating ASLR" a setup where the addresses change frequently,
and "static ASLR" a setup where the addresses change only sometimes but
differ between systems.)
* Servers that accept outsi
On 04/11/2013 04:57 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found.
It should be available in rpmfusion-nonfree.
rob
Thanx Rob, I found it.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.0-
On 04/11/2013 08:19 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> (I'll call "mutating ASLR" a setup where the addresses change frequently,
> and "static ASLR" a setup where the addresses change only sometimes
> but differ between systems.)
>
> * Servers that accept outside connections definitely should have mutati
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:32 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 08:19 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > (I'll call "mutating ASLR" a setup where the addresses change frequently,
> > and "static ASLR" a setup where the addresses change only sometimes
> > but differ between systems.)
> >
> > * Serv
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> With the current setup, we get "mutating ASLR" when compiled as PIE,
Surely ... you get "mutating ASLR" only when compiled as PIE
*and* the server process restarts itself between each connection or at
least on a regular basis (ie. i
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > With the current setup, we get "mutating ASLR" when compiled as PIE,
>
> Surely ... you get "mutating ASLR" only when compiled as PIE
> *and* the server process restarts itself between each connection o
Am 11.04.2013 19:52, schrieb Björn Persson:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> With the current setup, we get "mutating ASLR" when compiled as PIE,
>>
>> Surely ... you get "mutating ASLR" only when compiled as PIE
>> *and* the serve
- hho...@redhat.com wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 02:34 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote:
> > - hho...@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/05/2013 08:06 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote:
> >>> - hho...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>>
> On 03/21/2013 08:36 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote:
> > What is the deadline for fix
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 19 Alpha release
by one week due to unresolved UEFI bugs, see the blocker tracking app [1].
Otherwise we think we have pretty solid foundation for Alpha, please help
us to identify the real impact of the UEFI issues. More details in meeting
30 matches
Mail list logo
