rawhide report: 20130407 changes

2013-04-07 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 7 08:15:33 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [TurboGears2] TurboGears2-2.1.4-5.fc19.noarch requires python-webob <= 0:1.1.1 [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(ab

Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

2013-04-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Why was Java 1.4 succeeded by Java 5? Why was ICU 4.8.1 succeeded by ICU 49.1? Why does systemd have version 197 instead of 1.9.7 or somesuch? If you look at the source code and the package names, Java wasn't really renumbered that badly, Java 1.4 was succeeded by Java 1.5, and Java 1.5 by Java

F-19 Branched report: 20130407 changes

2013-04-07 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 7 09:16:05 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

2013-04-07 Thread Harald Hoyer
install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > -rw--- 1 root root 18M 22. Mär 17:06 > initramfs-0-rescue-74e76163c28448fba68b8667eb7b5d92.img > -rw

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-04-05

2013-04-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 08:35:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: I think after migrating to cgit there comes a lot if errors like this. How would cgit bit related to EVR errors? EVR errors typically come from doing an update in one branch, but not later ones. -- devel mailing list devel@lis

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-04-05

2013-04-07 Thread Christopher Meng
I mean the error script URL -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-04-05

2013-04-07 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Sunday, April 07, 2013 10:23 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: I mean the error script URL Please keep some context with your emails. Try quoting the actual parts of the emails you are answering to, as it avoids this kind of misunderstandings. -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

2013-04-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > Why was Java 1.4 succeeded by Java 5? Why was ICU 4.8.1 succeeded by ICU > 49.1? Why does systemd have version 197 instead of 1.9.7 or somesuch? > > If you look at the source code and the package names, Java wasn't really > renumbe

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

2013-04-07 Thread Reindl Harald
from my poing of veiw this is a huge step backwards all of that what the "feature" provides was possible long ago in a more predictable way Am 07.04.2013 15:06, schrieb Harald Hoyer: > install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release > Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Feat

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

2013-04-07 Thread Reindl Harald
ok, with "dracut-nohostonly" installed you become /usr/lib/dracut/dracut.conf.d/02-nohostonly.conf which is overriden by the since a long time existing /etc/dracut.conf.d/91-host-only.conf to have the same behavior as before and nobody thinks that tjis is a little pervert? [root@rawhide boot]# ca

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

2013-04-07 Thread Harald Hoyer
Oops.. I meant dracut-norescue of course Am 07.04.2013 15:06 schrieb "Harald Hoyer" : > install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release > Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > -rw-

Re: Undeprecating libsidplay and fbg

2013-04-07 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 04/06/2013 09:20 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:54:45 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi all, just a quick headsup that I'm undeprecating libsidplay and fbg. libsidplay, review request: 949165 - Review Request: libsidplay - SID chip music module playing library https:/

Re: Undeprecating libsidplay and fbg

2013-04-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:42:11 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > This is not only about free-ness this is also about some multimedia players > (notably the gstreamer framework) not having libsidplay v2 support. That's all? Will it ever support libsidplay v2 or libsidplayfp, if distributions continue t

Re: Undeprecating libsidplay and fbg

2013-04-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
Amazingly, somebody even has forked the old Qt based XSIDPLAY to port it libsidplayfp and reSID: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xsidplay2/files/xsidplay2/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Test-Announce] 2013-04-08 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2013-04-07 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2013-04-08 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again today/tomorrow! We'll be focusing in on Fedora 19 Alpha status - looks like

[Test-Announce] 2013-04-08 @ 16:00 UTC - F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #4

2013-04-07 Thread Adam Williamson
# F19 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2013-04-08 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net As we agreed in discussing modifications to the blocker review process, it's a better idea to have an official blocker review meeting right af