On 02/20/2013 05:21 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
"David" == David Malcolm writes:
David> In particular, for scripting languages,
David> it's most useful to be able to extract the script-level backtrace from
David> the C-level stack (i.e. "what was the Python code doing?")
FWIW we're adding direct su
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:26:31PM +0100, Peter Hanecak wrote:
> Having read some introductory information, I would now like to introduce
> myself with few short facts:
Hello! Welcome to being a Fedora contributor!
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
--
devel mailing list
de
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:54:49PM -0500, member graysky wrote:
> Hi All. I am the upsteam dev for profile-sync-daemon and have
> packaged it for: Arch Linux, Gentoo, and Ubuntu. I would like to
> extend that list to include Fedora as well. I have been simply
Cool; welcome to Fedora. Looks like
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-02-20)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 18:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-02-20/fesco.2013-02-20-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
David> In particular, for scripting languages,
David> it's most useful to be able to extract the script-level backtrace from
David> the C-level stack (i.e. "what was the Python code doing?")
Tom> FWIW we're adding direct support for this to gdb.
Tom> You'll be able to supply backtrace filters with
The lightweight tag 'perl-Sub-Exporter-0.985-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
903c1aa... Update to 0.985
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-de
On 02/21/2013 12:31 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2013 6:29 PM, "Basil Mohamed Gohar"
> mailto:basilgo...@librevideo.org>> wrote:
> >
> > For a while now the package "mate-file-archiver" has had a
> dependency problem and cannot be updated. I've opened a ticket about
> it (https://bugzilla.
commit 70cce1ddd65ae0357b0cc347e85d8e25f17fc0e2
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Feb 21 15:14:42 2013 +
Update to 2.05
- New upstream release 2.05
- Require perl 5.5
- Test for pod
- Fix line endings for documentation
- BR: perl(Carp), perl(Data::Dumper) ≥ 2.0
Summary of changes:
195c6d7... initial import (rhbz#912132) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
commit eb954f486fcff65917ce54c37abdee6bcea60e46
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Feb 21 08:25:27 2013 -0700
update to 0.11016
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SQL-Translator.spec | 27 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+),
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:22:27 +
Adam Huffman wrote:
> Hamster-applet has been orphaned for a while, primarily I imagine
> because it wasn't compatible with GNOME 3 until recently. According
> to the upstream site, it is now compatible:
>
> http://projecthamster.wordpress.com/
>
> and I woul
Hi
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> You need to submit a new review in any case, so do the new review with
> the new name?
>
Along with appropriate provides/obsoletes
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Filesys-SmbClient:
8a4205fe748aac7f43fb2a0e8ef502b2 Filesys-SmbClient-3.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
commit 6064401b6c5036edc39f8c8c20da5186993a7135
Author: Normunds Neimanis
Date: Thu Feb 21 20:29:27 2013 +0200
Initial import (#912477).
.gitignore |1 +
Filesys-SmbClient-3.2_Makefile.patch | 19 ++
perl-Filesys-SmbClient.spec | 65 +
On Thu Feb 21 08:33:26 UTC Matthew Miller wrote:
>Cool; welcome to Fedora. Looks like an interesting project. I'm curious if
>you have any benchmark data on increased speed beyond that of the raw
>devices, taking Linux's own caching into account.
I haven't actually. The primary design goal was a
Apparently, there are obsolete packages still in Rawhide (and have even
been rebuilt for the mass-rebuild, albeit not all of them). "Obsolete"
here really means they are obsoleted (=replaced!) by some other package.
Whoever may be responsible for this, please notice that there is a HOWTO
about rem
Hello,
I have tried to build the recent released version of blender. But unfotunately,
I have got the following odd error message:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz
--dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit 11000
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.66
ex
Hi Jochen,
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lr1DY2 (%install)
> bogus date in %changelog: Sun Jan 30 2006 Jochen Schmitt herr-schmitt de> 2.41-1
30th January 2006 was a Monday not a Sunday.
>
> So I would to like to ask, if anyone have an idea about the error message
> relati
On 02/21/2013 02:47 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to build the recent released version of blender. But unfotunately,
I have got the following odd error message:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz
--dwz-low-mem-die-limit 1000 --dwz-max-die-limit
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:23:25 +
"Michael E. Maher" wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lr1DY2 (%install)
> > bogus date in %changelog: Sun Jan 30 2006 Jochen Schmitt
> > 2.41-1
>
> 30th January 2006 was a Monday not a Sunday.
>
> >
> > So I would to
On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> Question: does a python segfault from a broken script indicate a
>> python bug as well? The scripting engine shouldn't really be crashin
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Apparently, there are obsolete packages still in Rawhide (and have even
been rebuilt for the mass-rebuild, albeit not all of them). "Obsolete"
here really means they are obsoleted (=replaced!) by some other package.
Whoever may be responsible for thi
On 02/21/13 10:39, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:16:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>> I was wondering if it is possible to download a spec file using yum
>> or rpm only (without downloading the rpm)?
>
> No, but there's a better way! All of our spec files are available in gi
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Apparently, there are obsolete packages still in Rawhide (and have even
> been rebuilt for the mass-rebuild, albeit not all of them). "Obsolete"
> here really means they are obsoleted (=replaced!) by some other package.
>
> Whoever may be
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
>
> Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
>
I think it should too. Maybe there are good reasons behind not making so.
Meanwhile you can do
$ yumdownloader --source pkgname
$ deco pkgname*.src.rpm
This should get you the packag
On 02/21/13 13:06, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 02/19/2013 03:31 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 02/18/13 21:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> […]
>>
>>> i would be thankful if even "grub2-mkconfig" would not create
>>> this "advanced" submenu at all
>>>
>>
>>
>> Actually there is a patch proposal at 'grub-devel' b
在 2013-2-22 AM8:22，"Orcan Ogetbil" 写道：
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
> >
>
> I think it should too. Maybe there are good reasons behind not making so.
> Meanwhile you can do
> $ yumdownloader --source pkgname
On 02/22/13 01:21, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
>>
>
> I think it should too. Maybe there are good reasons behind not making so.
> Meanwhile you can do
> $ yumdownloader --source pkgname
>
On 02/21/2013 11:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:23:25 +
"Michael E. Maher" wrote:
Hi Jochen,
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lr1DY2 (%install)
bogus date in %changelog: Sun Jan 30 2006 Jochen Schmitt
2.41-1
30th January 2006 was a Monday not a Sunda
Hi, everyone
I've a problem that has kept me worried about three weeks ago and i do not
know how to solve, when I try to test any package on koji (in any instance,
ppc, arm, s390, x86 ) that has a higher weight to a mega, it refuses to
even begin the task
example:
koji build --scratch rawhide ope
30 matches
Mail list logo
