On 02/16/2013 05:16 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:47:13 +0200
Panu Matilainen wrote:
I think Kevin was talking about "normal", ie non-debuginfo packages
like the example case of nacl-devel owning /usr/lib/debug, which
indeed is a (trivial) packaging bug. Except perhaps for the
Hi there,
I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even
though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a
result, the bugs are now closed WONTFIX even they were or are going to
be fixed.
Should we expect the bugzappers to not mass-close bugs that are in
MO
Am 17.02.2013 12:02, schrieb Christoph Wickert:
>
> Should we expect the bugzappers to not mass-close bugs that are in
> MODIFIED or ON_QA state or require maintainers to upgrade the bugs to a
> supported release even though they were originally filed in against an
> older version?
>
IMHO the bes
Olav Vitters wrote:
> 1. Show sessions before selecting/entering the user:
>Means basically including something like 'default session' or
>'previous session'
That's how the rest of the world does it…
> 2. Show sessions after selecting/entering the user:
>Means you can show the actual
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 09:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Several people on #fedora-kde see this UI as a way to push the agenda
>> of making users not even realize there's an alternative to GNOME
>
> Those "several people" have poor attitude when they assume malice. It is
> a poisono
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even
> though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a
> result, the bugs are now closed WONTFIX even they were or are going to
> be fixed.
What you
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> and which fool has written the feature page without knowing what binary
>> compatibility
>>
>
> You have been repeatedly using offensive language and shouting on the
> mailing lists on a regular basis.
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Also MySQL 5.6 gains some of its speed through [non-Free] commercial
> extensions (like e.g. the thread pool).
That's one more reason to NOT ship MySQL in Fedora now that there is an
alternative: It's crippleware!
> All of this benefits Fedoras users.
Software int
Honza Horak wrote:
> In F19, there still *will* be mysql-5.5.x.
But WHY? If we want to migrate our users to MariaDB, why not do it now?
What's the benefit of having both in F19? It just complicates things for
both maintainers of dependent packages and users.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mail
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> Difference never the less and difference in behavior ( which mariadbs
> own benchmarking on their website proof ) which means every server tweak
> that has been done for the mysql host has to be redone to take whatever
> changes and features mariadb introduces.
MySQL
While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and again
"unrecoverable error
ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3
file system errors left uncorrected
errors like this usually mean there is a problem with the filesystem that
will require user interaction to repair.
bef
Hi
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> I guess in this case the principle "never ascribe to malice what can be
> adequately explained by incompetence" applies. ;-)
>
I guess you are being sarcastic but assuming incompetence is slightly
better than assuming malice but the be
On 02/15/2013 05:41 AM, Tadej Janež wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is an example:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736498
> I filled this bug during the F-16 Graphics test week.
> After the Fedora EOL reminder and before the bug was closed, I tried to
> reproduce it on F-17 and I couldn't. Thu
Hi
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Please take into account that English is not Harald's (nor my, for that
> matter) first language. It's already hard to be polite when one's angry,
> but
> it's all the harder in a foreign language.
>
English isn't my native tongue eith
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >
> > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even
> > though there were pending updates for F17 and F18 to fix them. As a
> > result, the bugs are
Once upon a time, Rahul Sundaram said:
> English isn't my native tongue either. Sure, some of what I write will
> offend people because I am not expressing as clearly but I don't think that
> is the situation with Harald. He has been moderated quite heavily which is
> fairly unprecedented in Fed
On 02/17/2013 03:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
>> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>> I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even
>>> though there were pending updates for F17 and
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
>> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> >
>> > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o even
>> > though there were pending updat
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
> >> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I found that a couple of F16 bug
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 16:12 -0500 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež:
>> >> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christo
NEXTRELEASE should be great.
28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their email
address is invalid.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dear all,
I am trying to remix Fedora 17 on Atom D2500 system. It has a graphic card
of 400Mhz which corresponds to GMA3600.
The graphic module that is installed and used by default supports only
GMA500. Because of this, I suspect that the performance of graphically
intensive applications is get
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:02:11AM +0530, Rahul Bhalerao wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to remix Fedora 17 on Atom D2500 system. It has a graphic card
> of 400Mhz which corresponds to GMA3600.
Nope. It's a PowerVR part, not a GMA3x00 part. There's no acceleration
with any open source video
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-02-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. Topic list is pretty short this week,
so might be a short meeting
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:16:53PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
> I am working to become a packager for spice-html5 [1].
>
> Eduardo Echeverria has suggested that I break out the dependent
> Javascript libraries into separate packages, which I am now working on.
>
> I am attempting to follow the Ja
25 matches
Mail list logo
