Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Developers Assistant

On 28. 1. 2013 at 14:28:06, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) said: > > Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 à 15:27 +0100, Jan Zelený a écrit : > > > Currently we are working on some proof-of-concept stuff. But as an > > > example, you can imagine a script for creation of C program temp

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Developers Assistant

On 28. 1. 2013 at 18:48:41, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le lundi 28 janvier 2013 à 15:27 +0100, Jan Zelený a écrit : > > Currently we are working on some proof-of-concept stuff. But as an > > example, you can imagine a script for creation of C program templates. > > You will specify directory where it

libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

I have a filed a bug about this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345 "libcacard can never be installed" Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the

Re: libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I have a filed a bug about this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345 > "libcacard can never be installed" Is there a reason that qemu ships a bundled version of libcacard? What's the difference between the two of them

cpptest / Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:56:50 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > > cpptest -- A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ > > > I'll take this one. Only "uriparser" uses it currently. And there's an 1.1.2 upstream release, too. -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.8.0-0.rc4.g

Re: libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:57:11AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I have a filed a bug about this: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345 > > "libcacard can never be installed" > > Is there a reason that qemu ships

Re: cogl soname bump

Peter Robinson wrote: Sorry, I missed the cogl soname bump when I pushed the build last night, I'll work to rebuild associated deps now, any help appreciated. See future cogl soname bumps and ABI breaks analysis here: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/cogl.html -- Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA

uriparser / Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Just forwarding, because I've had a look: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > uriparser -- URI parsing library - RFC 3986 http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/uriparser There's an open ticket requesting an upgrade, claiming that the current release in Fedora is more than three y

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Simplify Java/Maven Packaging using XMvn

Quoting Toshio Kuratomi (2013-01-28 23:52:30) > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:51:42AM +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > > Goal of this feature is to migrate all packages to use XMvn instead of mvn- > > rpmbuild script. Several packages have already been converted as part of > > initial testing: >

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Just forwarding, because I've had a look: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet There have been a few upstream releases. There are three co-maintainers for this already. $ repoque

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library This one is a mystery: 2009-05-21 (!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/501993 RFE: update to 3.12.0 No reply at all. :( There's a co-maintainer, two more for EPEL, and other people have done b

Re: Strange subscriptions to Bugzilla bugs

rutadeevacuacion continues its crazy job: (s)he's just subscribed to one of my review request (closed 2009-08-07) BZ#505356. Although this does not affect me personally, I think this is some obscure way of mass parasitizing our infrastructure. No way to blacklist this address ? -- devel mailing l

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Yum Groups as Objects

On Monday 28 of January 2013 10:12:29 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon 28 Jan 2013 09:43:56 AM EST, Jan Zelený wrote: > > On 28. 1. 2013 at 08:21:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On

Re: Strange subscriptions to Bugzilla bugs

I've helped ccing infrastructure team. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GLIBC 2.17

On 01/28/2013 06:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said: See for code snippets to implement in the change in a backwards-compatible fashion. Unfortunately, glibc upstream insistent on renaming befor

Re: cpptest / Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Sounds good. I'll update it. Dan On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:56:50 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> > cpptest -- A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for >> > C++ >> >> >> I'll take this one. > > Only "uriparser" uses it cu

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GLIBC 2.17

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:39:21AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/28/2013 06:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said: > >>See > >>for code snippets to implement in the change in a > >>backwards-

unhide / Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Just forwarding, because I've had a look: The final one for today. ;) On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > unhide -- Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits Sounds interesting, didn't knew that one. Project site tells rkhunter uses it: $ repoquery

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Hi, On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200 Rakesh Pandit wrote: > taskcoach -- Your friendly task manager > xsel -- Command line clipboard and X selection tool I'll take these two. TR -- Tomas Radej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: libcacard can never be installed (was: Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp)

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:03:42 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > It looks as if the qemu source contains the one canonical copy of > libcacard. The separate 'libcacard' package has the following sources > file: > > $ cat sources > 189bc5b87281a72f8c72a0f7ebaa6d00 qemu-1.2.1.tar.bz2 > > So prob

icu 50 rebuilt without --disable-renaming again

Hi, As there seems no proper way to resolve the mess of rhbz#856594 I rebuilt icu-50.1.2-3.fc19 without --disable-renaming again. Please, if you built between Friday and today against icu-50.1.2-1.fc19 or icu-50.1.2-2.fc19 do another round against icu-50.1.2-3.fc19 Please accept my apology, I'm

Native vagrant packages for Fedora

Vagrant offers scripted provisioning and deployment of virtual instances, removing the infamous "but it works om my laptop" obstacle. Vagrant is well-known and much used and praised in the devops community. Its home page is http://vagrantup.com/ Though VirtualBox is the current supported target,

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GLIBC 2.17

On 01/29/2013 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Precisely because it's in the private namespace, glibc could just have documented the existing __secure_getenv symbol. It's not that there aren't any public functions starting with __. But this was rejected by upstream, and now we have the __secure_

RAWHIDE USERS: BEWARE RPM 4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19!

Apologies for shouting but we have a genuine, rare, rpmdb-eating bug (shade of dark paperbag) at hand: DO NOT UPGRADE TO rpm-4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19! The buggy version is expected to appear in todays rawhide-push. I've built a new version where the broken %ghost-related patch is reverted but

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: GLIBC 2.17

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > nss_hesiod needs secure_getenv, so a non-private symbol is needed. > In any case, I can link against __libc_secure_getenv in Fedora > rawhide: > > [root@oldenburg tmp]# rpm -q glibc > glibc-2.17-1.fc19.x86_64 > [root@oldenburg tmp]#

Re: Another unannounced soname bump: libseccomp

Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 19:44 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: 2:qemu-system-mips-1.3.0-5.fc19.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libseccomp.so.1()(64bit) DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: 2:qemu-system-or32-1.3.0-

Re: Releasing ownership

On 01/29/2013 07:59 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote: I am releasing ownership of the following packages due to lack of time gnome-guitar -- A small suite of applications for the guitarist I have taken this one. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraprojec

Re: icu 50 rebuilt without --disable-renaming again

Eike Rathke wrote, at 01/29/2013 07:11 PM +9:00: Hi, As there seems no proper way to resolve the mess of rhbz#856594 I rebuilt icu-50.1.2-3.fc19 without --disable-renaming again. Please, if you built between Friday and today against icu-50.1.2-1.fc19 or icu-50.1.2-2.fc19 do another round agains

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Mon 28 Jan 2013 02:17:29 PM EST, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > "Going away" isn't the correct phrase. The UI of Fallback Mode is going > > to transition to a new feature called Classic Mode. It's an official > > feature of Gnome 3.8. > > > > h

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with > > them 5 minutes? > > Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x transition? Similarly to how there > are forks of GNOME now to 'keep

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: > >> On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with >> > them 5 minutes? >> >> Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x transit

F18: Anaconda installer: Are there going to be any updates to this

I am trying to build a spin of Fedora18 for local use as I normally do with Fedora releases using pungi. All has been built fine but the installation fails with an Anaconda popup stating "The following error occurred ..." with no information on the error at all and nothing in the various virtual te

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 01/27/2013 03:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop Feature owner(s): Eric Smith This feature proposes that Fedora switch the default desktop interface from Gnome 3 to Cinnamon. Cinnamon pro

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: >> >> On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with >> > them 5 minutes? >> >> Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x tr

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Monday, January 28, 2013, Matthias Clasen wrote: > - Original Message - > > = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = > > > > I submit the proposition that it is easier for a user doing a new > > Fedora > > install to start with a traditional desktop, and switch to the Gnome > > Shell if

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

Hi Dan, On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:52:03 -0800 Dan Mashal wrote: > > Lets all listen to Miami because she did a great job with anaconda 18 > UI design, knows more than Linus, Alan Cox and is absolutely right on > everything! > Now, as much as I strongly disagree with the UI changes anaconda made in

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:13:34AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > Let's see how lightweight, bug free and usable it is. Why don't you just > merge the 3 projects instead of wasting your time? We could all work > together. MATE developers actually have GNOME git accounts now. > There could be differen

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 01/27/2013 03:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >> = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_**Default_Desktop >> >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: > >> On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with >> > them 5 minutes? >> >> Do you remember the GNOME 1.x => 2.x tra

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 08:33, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Rakesh Pandit [29/01/2013 03:37] : >> >> perl-Search-Xapian -- Xapian perl bindings > > I'll gladly take this one. > [..] You can take it now. Regards, -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:27:42 -0500 Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Mon 28 Jan 2013 02:17:29 PM EST, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > "Going away" isn't the correct phrase. The UI of Fallback Mode is > > going to transition to a new feature called Classic Mode. It's an > > official feature of Gnome 3.8. >

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 08:41, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 29/01/2013 02:37, Rakesh Pandit a écrit : > >> php-markdown -- Markdown implementation in PHP >> php-oauth -- PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications >> php-pear-Auth -- Authentication provider for PHP >> php-xmpphp -- XMPPHP is

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:52:03AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: >On Monday, January 28, 2013, M�ir�n Duffy wrote: > > On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play > with > > them 5 minutes? > > Do you rem

File Pod-Perldoc-3.19_01.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Perldoc: e586d0e1638156f2d69921cb18a94937 Pod-Perldoc-3.19_01.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 09:30, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 01/29/2013 02:37 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >> Hi, > >> I request existing fedora packagers if they can take up these >> packages. For packages which already have active co-maintainers >> already, you can collaborate with them. > >> >> django-mako

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 09:56, Dan Mashal wrote: >> cpptest -- A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ > > > I'll take this one. [..] You can take it now. Regards, -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[perl-Pod-Perldoc] 3.19_01 bump

commit 387d7de6fdd8862a26a72d8469f5cf2fc5a033eb Author: Petr Písař Date: Tue Jan 29 13:31:47 2013 +0100 3.19_01 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gi

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 01/29/2013 01:25 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/27/2013 03:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = https://fedoraproject.org/__wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as___Default_Desktop

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Olav Vitters wrote: > > >MATE developers actually have GNOME git accounts now. I know that. >GNOME classic is not the same as a fallback mode. I am skeptical. > > > MATE did not have that much development, nor that many developers if you > compare it to the amoun

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 01/29/2013 12:53 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Dan Mashal wrote: On Monday, January 28, 2013, Máirín Duffy wrote: On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 11:16, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Just forwarding, because I've had a look: > Thank you. Added enet-owner email to CC. > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > >> enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/en

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Yum Groups as Objects

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:31:33 -0500 James Antill wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 15:04 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:58:56PM +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > = Features/YumGroupsAsObjects = > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumGroupsAsObjects > > >

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 11:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > >> freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library > > This one is a mystery: > > 2009-05-21 (!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/501993 > RFE: update to 3.12.0 > > No reply at all. :( Yes I

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 12:02, Tomas Radej wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200 > Rakesh Pandit wrote: > >> taskcoach -- Your friendly task manager >> xsel -- Command line clipboard and X selection tool > > I'll take these two. > Thank you. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Shared System Certificates

On 2013-01-28, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/28/2013 03:45 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2013-01-25, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 01/24/2013 12:30 PM, Stef Walter wrote: >>> So yes, as noted in the 'Detailed Description' of the feature, long term we hope to follow this up with further wor

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Hello, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: I'll take these if not accounted for already: > djvulibre -- DjVu viewers, encoders, and utilities > jed -- Fast, compact editor based on the S-Lang screen library > libogg -- The Ogg bitstream file format library > libosip2 -- oSIP i

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:36:22AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Olav Vitters wrote: > > > > >MATE developers actually have GNOME git accounts now. > > I know that. > > >GNOME classic is not the same as a fallback mode. > > > I am skeptical. That is not what I meant.

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > On 29 January 2013 11:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >> >>> freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library >> >> This one is a mystery: >> >> 2009-05-21 (!) https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 14:52, François Cami wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > > I'll take these if not accounted for already: > >> djvulibre -- DjVu viewers, encoders, and utilities >> jed -- Fast, compact editor based on the S-Lang screen library >> libogg --

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 14:55, François Cami wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >> On 29 January 2013 11:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >>> freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library >>> >>> This one is a m

File Module-Build-WithXSpp-0.13.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by churchyard

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp: 8e4f4ab5782d2916f182129d48172e10 Module-Build-WithXSpp-0.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 01/29/2013 08:25 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: I'm sure QA, releng, docs, etc will go with what the community decides. Why would they? They are community too, they don't have to "follow" on what other decide, they are free to go on working on the QA and docs of GNOME if they prefer, just like you

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On 01/29/2013 08:25 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> >> I'm sure QA, releng, docs, etc will go with what the community decides. > > > Why would they? > > They are community too, they don't have to "follow" on what other decide, > they are free to go

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

Dan Mashal píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:25 -0800: > I'll tell you what, last time I checked #1 spin is KDE. 1. because the Desktop "spin" is not included in the counter. 2. I doubt those numbers are accurate. Only 54 downloads of Xfce spin for this release? I hope you understand it's completely out

Re: RAWHIDE USERS: BEWARE RPM 4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19!

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:09:49 +0200 Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Apologies for shouting but we have a genuine, rare, rpmdb-eating bug > (shade of dark paperbag) at hand: > > DO NOT UPGRADE TO rpm-4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19! > > The buggy version is expected to appear in todays rawhide-push. I've > b

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > Dan Mashal píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:25 -0800: >> I'll tell you what, last time I checked #1 spin is KDE. > > 1. because the Desktop "spin" is not included in the counter. > 2. I doubt those numbers are accurate. Only 54 downloads of Xfce

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013/1/29 Olav Vitters > [...] > I've seen the changes that various GNOME developers as well as Red Hat > employees have made. I've seen GNOME developers trying to understand > issues and make changes. I've even tried to summarize this in various > release notes. > Now I'm not sure who you mean w

Re: Fedora Windows Spice/Virtio KVM drivers and tools (was Re: Red Hat QXL GPU Driver for Windows 7?)

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:25:19PM +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > > > For this use case, all they need to do is to grab the spice-guest-tools > > > > installer and run that, the mess you describe is the exact reason why > > I'm > > > > building this installer. > > > > > > > > > > The installer work

Re: RAWHIDE USERS: BEWARE RPM 4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19!

On 01/29/2013 03:14 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:09:49 +0200 Panu Matilainen wrote: Apologies for shouting but we have a genuine, rare, rpmdb-eating bug (shade of dark paperbag) at hand: DO NOT UPGRADE TO rpm-4.11.0-0.beta1.2.fc19! The buggy version is expected to appear

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 01/27/2013 03:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop Feature owner(s): Eric Smith This feature proposes that Fedora switch the default desktop interface from Gnome 3 to Cinnamon. Cinnamon pro

Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

Hello, just a minor point, not getting into the wider "should getaddrinfo() be the primary interface" debate... On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Nick Jones wrote: > As a quick summary: I would suggest, in addition to addressing > the outstanding bugs and issues covered by the Fedora feature, > a

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet There have been a few upstream releases. There are three co-maintainers for this already. @enet co-maintainers Anyone wants to take it ? I'll give fcami first crack since he seems to have particu

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP >>> >>> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet >>> There have been a few upstream releases. >>> There are three co-maintainers for this already. >> >> @enet co-maintainers >> >> Any

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Mathieu Bridon > wrote: > > On 01/29/2013 08:25 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> > >> I'm sure QA, releng, docs, etc will go with what the community decides. > > > > > > Why would they? > > > > They are community too

Re: BuildRequires for texlive stuff for F18 and beyond

On 01/25/2013 09:42 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi - jonathan.underwood wrote: [...] With the more fine grained texlive packaging in F>18 where tex(latex) is provided by texlive-collection-latex I am finding that this is insufficient to build most documents. I see two options in these cases:

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per release. Maybe this is the best solution. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re:

which board?ARM? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On 29 January 2013 15:51, François Cami wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet There have been a few upstream releases. There are three co-maintainers f

Re: IDLE state:High CPU utilization

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 06:47:21PM +0530, magina antimage wrote: > I have ported fedora for my target board, >i am getting high CPU utilisation(30-35%) even when my system is idle > (no gnome / X session). > i used top command to see which process is consuming CPU,but couldn't find How ar

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > On 29 January 2013 15:51, François Cami wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet > There have been

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:56:17 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per > release. > > Maybe this is the best solution. No, it's not a Screensaver. -- Regards, Frank http//www.frankly3d.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per release. Maybe this is the best solution. It might be nice extension to different wallpaper in every release ;) Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: New firstboot

Hi Adam, it will use Anaconda screens that already exist (like Time and Date, Root password) or are planned for F19 (User creation). So the project itself does not require any heavy coding. The 3rd party screens are out of our hands, but are not necessary for the system to work. The current fi

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: New firstboot

Hi, no, system-config-* is not going to be used anywhere. Martin - Original Message - > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Features/NewFirstboot = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewFirstboot > > > > Feature owner(s): Martin Sivák > ... > > Firstboot currently depends on system-

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: New firstboot

Hi, the tool will be started using systemd unit file which can be disabled. It will have to be explicit (even minimal install needs users or root password), but we can figure something out. Martin - Original Message - > > > From: Jaroslav Reznik > > > > = Features/NewFirstboot = > >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On 01/29/2013 01:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/27/2013 03:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop Feature owner(s): Eric Smith This feature proposes that Fedora switch the default desktop

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013/1/29 Vít Ondruch : > Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): > >> >> Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per >> release. >> >> Maybe this is the best solution. >> >> > > It might be nice extension to different wallpaper in every release ;) How about instal

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2013/1/29 Vít Ondruch : > > Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): > > > >> > >> Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per > >> release. > >> > >> Maybe this is the best solution. > >> > >> > > > > It m

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: New firstboot

Hi, yes, all the screens are shared with the Anaconda installer and the internal data structure is closely tied to kickstart. This allows us to configure almost everything using kickstart and then dump the final kickstart for the admin to see (as we always did). Headless is a bit harder, someo

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2013/1/29 Vít Ondruch : >> Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): >> >>> >>> Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per >>> release. >>> >>> Maybe this is the best solution. >>> >>> >> >> It might be nic

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: New firstboot

Hi, this has nothing to do with Gnome. Initial-setup will prepare system-wide settings regardless on the WM as firstboot did. The only difference here (which is not implemented yet) is to skip the user creation screens in case GDM is the login manager and Gnome asks for it. In that case GIE pa

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:17:20AM -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Dan Mashal píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:25 -0800: > >> I'll tell you what, last time I checked #1 spin is KDE. > > > > 1. because the Desktop "spin" is not included in the counte

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: New firstboot

Answer below :) On 2013-01-29 15:20, Martin Sivak wrote: Hi, yes, all the screens are shared with the Anaconda installer and the internal data structure is closely tied to kickstart. This allows us to configure almost everything using kickstart and then dump the final kickstart for the admin

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: NFStest

Hello, On 24/01/13 12:33, Paul Wouters wrote: > For libreswan we use a system that generates various VM images using a > network install and libvirt, and then fires off multiple VMs, login in > over serial, and run various tests and output. Then we compare the > output with known good output. This

Proposed F19 Feature: Anaconda Realm Integration

= Features/AnacondaRealmIntegration = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AnacondaRealmIntegration Feature owner(s): Vratislav Podzimek , Stef Walter Kickstart will have a 'realm join example.com' command, to join the machine during install to an AD or FreeIPA domain. This will take place

Proposed F19 Feature: AnacondaNewUI Followup

= Features/AnacondaNewUI Followup = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AnacondaNewUI_Followup Feature owner(s): Chris Lumens The purpose of this feature is to describe the high level work items we have for anaconda related to newui in F-19. == Detailed description == * Add in advanced

Proposed F19 Feature: Better NetworkManager IPSec Integration

= Features/BetterNetworkManagerIPSecIntegration = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterNetworkManagerIPSecIntegration Feature owner(s): Dan Williams IPSec usage is becoming more popular and the existing NetworkManager IPSec VPN plugin will be enhanced to better support these use-cases

Proposed F19 Feature: CUPS 1.6

= Features/CUPS1.6 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CUPS1.6 Feature owner(s): Tim Waugh , Jiri Popelka Update CUPS to the latest upstream release and use PDF rather than PostScript as baseline document format. == Detailed description == CUPS 1.6 was released in July 2012 and has br

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

- Original Message - > From: "Dan Mashal" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:13:34 PM > Subject: Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop > > > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > - Orig

Re: IDLE state:High CPU utilization

On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 18:47 +0530, magina antimage wrote: > Hi, > I have ported fedora for my target board, >i am getting high CPU utilisation(30-35%) even when my system is > idle (no gnome / X session). > i used top command to see which process is consuming CPU,but couldn't > find any. >

  1   2   3   >