On 12/27/2012 07:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:55:01 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
As I understand it, we have a policy handling unresponsive submitters or
reviewers. However, there is a third case when the complete process is
stalled.
The situation then becomes problematic
Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18?
If so, can you estimate how long it will take?
Thank you.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:48:45 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Continue talking to the other people,
>
> [snip]
>
>
> Yes, this is the correct action. But it's hard to talk to people if
> they don't reply at all or not in a meaningful way. I'm not talking
> about reviews making progress, poss
On 27.12.2012 10:34, M.M. wrote:
> Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18?
> If so, can you estimate how long it will take?
> Thank you.
See http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46002.html
Quoting one part:
"""
> Fedora 18: […] The 3.7 kernel rebase will be available as an update via the
On 12/27/2012 10:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:48:45 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Continue talking to the other people,
[snip]
Yes, this is the correct action. But it's hard to talk to people if
they don't reply at all or not in a meaningful way. I'm not talking
abo
Thank you.
2012/12/27 Thorsten Leemhuis
> On 27.12.2012 10:34, M.M. wrote:
> > Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18?
> > If so, can you estimate how long it will take?
> > Thank you.
>
> See http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46002.html
> Quoting one part:
>
> """
> > Fedora 18: […]
Hello everyone,
I am Mark Klein, a 14-year-old high school student from Honolulu, Hawaii.
(UTC-10)
I am participating in the Google Code-In contest and for my task[0], I
designed an android application[1] for Planet Fedora[2], which is a website
that displays blog posts by Fedora developers. The
Compose started at Thu Dec 27 08:15:07 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dogtag-pki]
dogtag-pki-10.0.0-0.16.b3.fc19.noarch requires dogtag-pki-server-theme
>= 0:10.0.0
[ember]
ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libOgreMain.
Compose started at Thu Dec 27 09:16:16 UTC 2012
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Upgraded Packages: 0
Compose finished at Thu Dec 27 13:13:00 UTC 2012
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however when
attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and states
that few files from glib2-devel.i686 conflict w/the x86_64 flavor.
The listed conflicting files seem related to gdb and systemtap (tools)
inte
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:30:25 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> file /usr/bin/gdbus-codegen from install of
> glib2-devel-2.32.4-2.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package
> glib2-devel-2.32.4-2.fc17.x86_64
Not addressing here.
> file /usr/share/glib-2.0/gdb/glib.pyc from install of
> glib2-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone.
Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18 Spherical Cow.
My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
services like NAT, UPnP, DDNS,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 15:49:33 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[mygui]
mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.i686 requires libCommon.so
mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
mygui-demos-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
mygui-tools-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64b
On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18 Spherical Cow.
> My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
> management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
> services like NAT, UPnP, DDN
On 12/27/2012 05:30 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however
> when attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and
> states that few files from glib2-devel.i686 conflict w/the x86_64 flavor.
>
> The listed conflic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/12/2012 16:27, Basil Mohamed Gohar ha scritto:
> On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18
>> Spherical Cow. My internet connection implicates an outdoor
>> antenna e
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 12/27/2012 05:30 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however
> > when attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and
> > states that few files from g
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:11:10 -0600
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 15:49:33 -0700,
>Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> >> [mygui]
> >> mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.i686 requires libCommon.so
> >> mygui-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libCommon.so()(64bit)
> >> mygui-demos-3.2.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requi
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:09:51 +0100, Antonio wrote:
> My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped with a
> management software that includes a firewall (as well as other
> services like NAT, UPnP, DDNS, ...);
After trying to workaround this and that ISP/WiFi router I have found mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 27/12/2012 17:47, Jan Kratochvil ha scritto:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:09:51 +0100, Antonio wrote:
>> My internet connection implicates an outdoor antenna equipped
>> with a management software that includes a firewall (as well as
>> other services l
On 12/27/2012 11:40 AM, Antonio wrote:
> Il 27/12/2012 16:27, Basil Mohamed Gohar ha scritto:
> > On 12/27/2012 10:09 AM, Antonio wrote:
> >> Hello everyone.
> >>
> >> Currently I use the latest version of Ekiga on Fedora 18
> >> Spherical Cow. My internet connection implicates an outdoor
> >> ante
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar
wrote:
> Someone with more networking experience than me should probably reply,
I'll do my best to help give some background information here that
might be useful. It's probably a bit more than you were expecting,
but I've taught this topic fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nella citazione in data gio 27 dic 2012 20:14:20 CET, Jared K. Smith ha
scritto:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar
> wrote:
>> Someone with more networking experience than me should probably reply,
>
> I'll do my best to help give
Brendan Jones gmail.com> writes:
> If you look at the build status you can see pulseaudio is hardly
> unmaintained.
>
> Rex Dieter has also provided a backport of the latest pulseaudio to use
> with early releases. I'm sure he is very amenable to cherry picking
> patches from a later release
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hence the question: isn't there a easy way to avoid this somehow in the
> future?
Just stop enabling updates-testing by default. That will fix both your case
(you'll have enabled=1 as a hand-edit and thus RPM will recognize your file
as modified and not overwrite it wi
Steve Clark wrote:
> Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs?
Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora
releases as opposed to rebasing to a new version, and nobody has the time to
identify and backport the relevant commits.
IMHO, we should just upgrade PulseA
Alec Leamas wrote:
> The situation then becomes problematic if the stalled process handles a
> package you want that much that you are willing to package it yourself -
> if you submit it it will (rightfully) be closed as a duplicate.
Don't let it go that far, instead immediately close the stalled
Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Dear list, Dear Lennart,
>
> a week ago I have submitted a pulseaudio bug alongside with the patch
> [1]. There was no response so far.
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888422
Updated submitted that includes the upstream fix,
https://admin.fedoraproject
On 12/03/2012 09:20 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
I'll try to take a look at this later this week (I'd do it now, but I'm
in all day meetings).
Hi Spot,
Did you have a chance to take a look at this?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
29 matches
Mail list logo
