> Main.hs:31:8:
> Could not find module `System'
> It is a member of the hidden package `haskell98-2.0.0.1'.
> Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
>
> It may be nice, if anyone can tell me in which package I
> could find the missed System module.
I had a look and kaya need
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> > > * Simplifying the process for self-contained features (e.g. individual
> > > package version upgrades)
> >
> > I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better towards
> >
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub:
1b8d5af787c870ce94dade88e322e9d1 Net-GitHub-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
commit b308bdbf549200048ccf956ddfac287c6a5fc1cb
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Thu Nov 29 10:51:10 2012 +0100
0.50 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-GitHub.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitign
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
> For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
>
> Minutes:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-11-28/fedora-me
- Original Message -
> From: "Orion Poplawski"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , yum-ow...@fedoraproject.org,
> yum-cron-ow...@fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:47:19 PM
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20121128 changes
>
> On 11/28/2012 06:32 AM
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:32:35 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
>
> On 11/28/2012 08:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> > this proposal was recently linked in v
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > this proposal was rec
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:50:48 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time,
On 28/11/2012 10:06 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Hi Alex!
Do you have an srpm we can test with?
Dan
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis
mailto:aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca>>
wrote:
On 28/11/2012 5:27 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote:
Hello
I have cu
Compose started at Thu Nov 29 09:15:25 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-3.fc18
gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison has to be done by avas and so "dn: cn=user
two,dc=example,dc=com" to be compared to "cn=user
I will get those packages signed.
Thanks
On , Rudolf Kastl
wrote:
> Another comment: while you keep that repository up id really
welcome if you could sign the packages in your private repo.
>
>
2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl
>
>> Actually the baseurl
provided in your paste does not work for m
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison ha
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 15:01:21 -0700,
> >
> >There are several mechanisms for a developer to get their work into the
> >release notes. The rel-notes BZ tag was wholly unused during this cycle, to
> >the best of my knowledge. There were n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:31:25AM -0700, pete wrote:
> It's actually 'fedora_requires_release_note' - you can find it with the
> other, more familiar tags.
>
> The response from Chris reminded me of the value of brevity, so I'll add
> one comment b
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173805.html
Why thi
On 11/29/2012 04:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
>
I had two machines updated using yum and although it is not a
recommended it worked without any problems.
Before going that route you should take a look into
https://fedoraproje
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 16:47:16 +,
Sérgio Basto wrote:
3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let me
upgrade .
You probably should rebort this as a bug.
4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade
So what you advise me to upgrade
On 11/29/2012 05:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
upgrade to F18 Beta .
1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipe
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
> upgrade to F18 Beta .
>
> 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let
> me upgrade .
>
I used fedup earlier today, to successfully upgra
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
> upgrade to F18 Beta .
>
>
> 1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ?
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html
>
> http:
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 17:21 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
> > upgrade to F18 Beta .
>
> >
> > 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't
Il 29/11/2012 17:47, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
> 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let me
> upgrade
Check if this bug could be related to your experience
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881764
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 10:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
> > upgrade to F18 Beta .
> >
> >
> > 1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ?
> > http://
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:02:41 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 10:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 +
> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want
> > > upgrade to F18 Beta .
> > >
I have signed the packages and updated my repo. I have also created
a rpm to install the repo config and the gpg pub key.
yum install
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/x86_64/RPMS/enlightenment-repo-0.0.2-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
I also built a new 17 test machine to test out the i
Hi everybody,
I would like to do whatever it takes to bring lsyncd, one of the packages
announced as abandoned in [1], up-to-date in EPEL.
The specs [2] build in my mock sandbox for CentOS 5, CentOS 6, and Fedora, and
the resultant packages have been working fine for me.
I work at a prominent
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Troy C wrote:
I've requested co-maintainer ship to bring this package up to speed
again. Thanks for the patches in the bugzilla.
Paul
I would like to do whatever it takes to bring lsyncd, one of the packages
announced as abandoned in [1], up-to-date in EPEL.
The specs [
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 05:38 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> > Lacks clarification on what's considered an feature.
> >
> > Arguably it should be mandatory for feature owners to provide or work
> > with the documentation and or marketing communities documenting and
> > publishing what benefits c
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 12:28 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
>
> Sounds like a plan, hopefully it won't be too difficult to figure out.
I was just out of space in Hard Disk, correctly writes package
foo needs 100M etc
But should end with a nice message saying "you need free space of your
disk before u
31 matches
Mail list logo
