Re: [Help Wanted] Which package provide the System Module for rawhide

2012-11-29 Thread Jens Petersen
> Main.hs:31:8: > Could not find module `System' > It is a member of the hidden package `haskell98-2.0.0.1'. > Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. > > It may be nice, if anyone can tell me in which package I > could find the missed System module. I had a look and kaya need

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > > * Simplifying the process for self-contained features (e.g. individual > > > package version upgrades) > > > > I don't see why these are features at all. Surely it's better towards > >

File Net-GitHub-0.50.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2012-11-29 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub: 1b8d5af787c870ce94dade88e322e9d1 Net-GitHub-0.50.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

[perl-Net-GitHub] 0.50 bump

2012-11-29 Thread Petr Šabata
commit b308bdbf549200048ccf956ddfac287c6a5fc1cb Author: Petr Šabata Date: Thu Nov 29 10:51:10 2012 +0100 0.50 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Net-GitHub.spec |8 ++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitign

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM weekly status meeting minutes 2012-11-28

2012-11-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Paul Whalen wrote: > Good day all, > > Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today. > For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below: > > Minutes: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-11-28/fedora-me

Re: rawhide report: 20121128 changes

2012-11-29 Thread Marcela Maslanova
- Original Message - > From: "Orion Poplawski" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , yum-ow...@fedoraproject.org, > yum-cron-ow...@fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:47:19 PM > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20121128 changes > > On 11/28/2012 06:32 AM

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread Marcela Maslanova
- Original Message - > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:32:35 AM > Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements > > On 11/28/2012 08:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Hello, > > this proposal was recently linked in v

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread Marcela Maslanova
- Original Message - > From: "Matthew Miller" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM > Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > this proposal was rec

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread Marcela Maslanova
- Original Message - > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:50:48 AM > Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time,

Re: rssh (need a sponsor and package from database)

2012-11-29 Thread Alexander Aristotle Davis
On 28/11/2012 10:06 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: Hi Alex! Do you have an srpm we can test with? Dan On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis mailto:aadav...@learn.senecac.on.ca>> wrote: On 28/11/2012 5:27 PM, Alexander Aristotle Davis wrote: Hello I have cu

F-18 Branched report: 20121129 changes

2012-11-29 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Nov 29 09:15:25 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-3.fc18 gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2

Re: [389-devel] clarification on dn normalization

2012-11-29 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi, I found an older post by KurtZeilenga: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that the comparison has to be done by avas and so "dn: cn=user two,dc=example,dc=com" to be compared to "cn=user

Re: Self Introduction

2012-11-29 Thread Edward Mann
I will get those packages signed. Thanks On , Rudolf Kastl wrote: > Another comment: while you keep that repository up id really welcome if you could sign the packages in your private repo. > > 2012/11/29 Rudolf Kastl > >> Actually the baseurl provided in your paste does not work for m

Re: [389-devel] clarification on dn normalization

2012-11-29 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi, On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote: On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi, I found an older post by KurtZeilenga: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that the comparison ha

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread pete
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 15:01:21 -0700, > > > >There are several mechanisms for a developer to get their work into the > >release notes. The rel-notes BZ tag was wholly unused during this cycle, to > >the best of my knowledge. There were n

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread Eric Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:31:25AM -0700, pete wrote: > It's actually 'fedora_requires_release_note' - you can find it with the > other, more familiar tags. > > The response from Chris reminded me of the value of brevity, so I'll add > one comment b

I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want upgrade to F18 Beta . 1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173805.html Why thi

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread José Matos
On 11/29/2012 04:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > 4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade > I had two machines updated using yum and although it is not a recommended it worked without any problems. Before going that route you should take a look into https://fedoraproje

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 16:47:16 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let me upgrade . You probably should rebort this as a bug. 4- use yum but I have bad memories from FC2 about use yum for upgrade So what you advise me to upgrade

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 11/29/2012 05:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want upgrade to F18 Beta . 1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ? http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipe

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Frank Murphy
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want > upgrade to F18 Beta . > > 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let > me upgrade . > I used fedup earlier today, to successfully upgra

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Tim Flink
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want > upgrade to F18 Beta . > > > 1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ? > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-August/109441.html > > http:

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 17:21 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want > > upgrade to F18 Beta . > > > > > 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Caterpillar
Il 29/11/2012 17:47, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: > 3 - Fedup , gives me a Traceback on transaction test. And don't let me > upgrade Check if this bug could be related to your experience https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881764 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 10:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want > > upgrade to F18 Beta . > > > > > > 1 - Try Preupgrade but No preupgrade for F17->F18 ? > > http://

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Tim Flink
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:02:41 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 10:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:47:16 + > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I have two machines for test on at home and one at office , I want > > > upgrade to F18 Beta . > > >

Re: Self Introduction

2012-11-29 Thread Edward Mann
I have signed the packages and updated my repo. I have also created a rpm to install the repo config and the gpg pub key. yum install http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/17/x86_64/RPMS/enlightenment-repo-0.0.2-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm I also built a new 17 test machine to test out the i

Self Introduction

2012-11-29 Thread Troy C
Hi everybody, I would like to do whatever it takes to bring lsyncd, one of the packages announced as abandoned in [1], up-to-date in EPEL. The specs [2] build in my mock sandbox for CentOS 5, CentOS 6, and Fedora, and the resultant packages have been working fine for me. I work at a prominent

Re: Self Introduction

2012-11-29 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Troy C wrote: I've requested co-maintainer ship to bring this package up to speed again. Thanks for the patches in the bugzilla. Paul I would like to do whatever it takes to bring lsyncd, one of the packages announced as abandoned in [1], up-to-date in EPEL. The specs [

Re: RFC: Feature process improvements

2012-11-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 05:38 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote: > > Lacks clarification on what's considered an feature. > > > > Arguably it should be mandatory for feature owners to provide or work > > with the documentation and or marketing communities documenting and > > publishing what benefits c

Re: I want upgrade my computer

2012-11-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 12:28 -0700, Tim Flink wrote: > > Sounds like a plan, hopefully it won't be too difficult to figure out. I was just out of space in Hard Disk, correctly writes package foo needs 100M etc But should end with a nice message saying "you need free space of your disk before u