I believe, so we need to check in on current blockers
and fedup status.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121119
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda T
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> > So where's that put kickstart?
> > Or is the assumption that anyone who wants a more-minimal target won't
> > be going that route?
>
> Many of the outside-of-anaconda tools use kickstart too; they just don't
> necessarily have the same rules for
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:29:51AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Many of the outside-of-anaconda tools use kickstart too; they just don't
> > necessarily have the same rules for pulling in core automatically.
> > I don't know if that's necessarily a great situation, since it means the
> > same
This change actually happened in 2008 (jikes), but we seemed to have missed it.
Most of code is now GPLv3+, except libxmi which stayed on GPLv2+. No package
seems to BR plotutils so I assume there are no licensing conflicts.
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Br
On 11/16/2012 06:35 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:06:03PM -0500, Scott Schmit wrote:> On Fri, Nov 16,
2012 at 09:26:30AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Tools outside of anaconda don't have to force @core, which opens
those tools up to far more creative payloads.
So where's
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:09 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
[...]
> There's now a rebuild of LLVM 3.1 for F17:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=367092
The choice about what should be provided should be tagged
- "Fast Moving Development" example boost libraries
i lik
