On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:15:52 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> Because I haven't entirely run kicking and screaming from attempting to
>> package nodejs, I (FAS: "patches") will take:
>
> Do you think you would be able to make somewhere builda
On 10/09/2012 05:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
there's no simple 'install all those docs that got left out'
command.
That is icky. I would like a minimal install base with a docs add-on.
Is this a possibility for newui anaconda in the F18 time f
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 09:55 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you think you would be able to make somewhere buildable packages of
>>> nodejs (before you can manage to push it to Fedora proper)? I haven't
>>> managed to build the stack on F18 (https://
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:01:22PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
> e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
> the open floor topic. Note
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:19:59PM -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me
> get this straight: You want a group called "adm", presumably short for
> "administrator", the point of which is that it can view system things,
> but not ac
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:14:39PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Anaconda isn't going to do that unless there is rpm support to
> re-docify yourself. To accomplish this right now, every package
> would have to split out a -docs subpackage with all the docs in it.
> Anaconda /might/ do what you wan
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 18:14 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 05:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> there's no simple 'install all those docs that got left out'
> >> command.
> >
> > That is icky. I would like a minimal install base
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 23:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I am not generally against adding time-based rotation, but really,
> this
> is much less of a "necessity" than other things the journal provides,
> which syslog does not: for example per-service rate limits, and
> unfakable meta-data fo
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:30:38PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Oh come on, stop bashing unix, logrotate could certainly grow a size
> checking policy if people felt the need, unix is not holding you back,
> in fact you are building this stuff on a unix-like system.
In fact, logrotate _has_ a size c
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:30:38PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Oh come on, stop bashing unix, logrotate could certainly grow a size
> > checking policy if people felt the need, unix is not holding you back,
> > in fact you are building thi
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller said:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:19:59PM -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> > Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me
> > get this straight: You want a group called "adm", presumably short for
> > "administrator", the point of which
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:25 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 18:14 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 10/09/2012 05:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> there's no simple 'install all those docs that got left out'
> > >> co
Seth Vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> >Maybe the definition of the fedora base set needs a bit of updating,
> >given that it considers rdisc, saslauthd, audit, dnsmasq, syslog, wpa
> >supplicant and sendmail basic. For container setups I need nothing of
> >that... (heck! for my non-contai
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
> From the list of packages this minimal set still installs, that I'd
> really like to see gone:
>
> chkconfig
Mostly obsolete requirements not removed in systemd migration; probably
could stand to have some bugs filed.
> gamin
glib2.
> info
Al
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> in the past, anaconda's language settings were more about default
> localization, not about what locales should be installed. The package
> selection interface had separate packages for supporting some languages.
> So somewhere close to that screen mig
On 9 October 2012 20:45, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:30:38PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > Oh come on, stop bashing unix, logrotate could certainly grow a size
>> > checking policy if people felt the need, unix is not h
On 10/09/2012 09:42 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:59:08AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
In current versions .service is implied if no extension is provided:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
About time :-)
Awesome.
And I want to take a moment to thank every
201 - 217 of 217 matches
Mail list logo