New guile2 package

2012-10-05 Thread Jan Synacek
Hello all, since porting apps to guile2 has been pretty painful so far, I decided to take another try. My take so far has been to create a new package called guile2. This will allow for the new packages that depend on guile2 to be built, while the old stuff won't be broken because guile1.8 will s

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Nikos Roussos
I would also like to take this one: skyviewer -- Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files (but just the Fedora branches) FAS: comzeradd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Marko
On 10/04/2012 08:13 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:10:47AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > Feature request: > > > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to > any > > > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? > > > > Never m

File Data-Dumper-2.136.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-10-05 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-Dumper: 60f7071afa260fb30df74d6c1b116967 Data-Dumper-2.136.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

[perl-Data-Dumper] 2.136 bump

2012-10-05 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 5df848364d4c8ff0b642fcd02f0f8904dc876731 Author: Petr Písař Date: Fri Oct 5 11:06:11 2012 +0200 2.136 bump .gitignore|1 + .rpmlint |2 ++ perl-Data-Dumper.spec | 13 - sources |2 +- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Marko
On 10/05/2012 04:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:10 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > >> > Feature request: >> > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any >> > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? >> >> Never mind. It seems yo

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Matěj Cepl
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:23:02 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > git-bugzilla -- Attach patches to a bugzilla bug I'll take it. FAS name: mcepl Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2012-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> kBuild -- A cross-platform build environment > > This could be orphan, kmk_sed fails if kBuild was compiled with gcc 4.7 > and upstream doesn't fix it. > > http://svn.netlabs.org/kbuild/ti

F-18 Branched report: 20121005 changes

2012-10-05 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Oct 5 09:15:32 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [almanah] almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit) almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)

Compiz

2012-10-05 Thread Rave it
Hi, i've re-retired the compiz package. There are some old user acl's for rawhide. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/compiz?_csrf_token=d92e6e7618be26b35f4fda2321a71f4e540a37f9 user: ajax alexl caillon caolanm davidz hadess hicham johnp jrb mbarnes mclasen rhughes rnorwood rstrode

orphaning/retiring drivers for old Lexmark inkjet "GDI-only" printers

2012-10-05 Thread Jiri Popelka
Hi, I took over Lubomir Rintel's printing packages, investigated them and most of them are drivers to few old, cheap Lexmark inkjet printers. The drivers are reverse engineered because Lexmark was considering their proprietary protocol top secret. Here's the list of packages with printers that

Re: Compiz

2012-10-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:58 +0200, Rave it wrote: > Hi, > i've re-retired the compiz package. > > There are some old user acl's for rawhide. [...] > Are you really interest to keep your acl's for compiz? > Pls reply, otherwise i assume i can delete your rights. > You can delete them all. They'

Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

2012-10-05 Thread Jiri Eischmann
Hi, the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed several times, last time a few month ago. I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1] whose goal was to make Software Center a distribution independent program using PackageKit. Matthias even made

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in a more orderly fashion. Please reply to the lis

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Jones
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:09:24PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >pulseaudio -- Improved Linux sound server > > ??? !!! As others have mentioned, packages are on this list even if the only place he owns them is EPEL. -- Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:/

Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
-- Forwarded message -- From: Przemek Klosowski Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM Subject: Re: Packages in need of new maintainers To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Nikos Roussos
Przemek Klosowski wrote: >On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are >> in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply >> orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in >> a more or

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are >> in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply >> orphan them all, but given the large number we

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

2012-10-05 Thread Paul Howarth
I'll take: > perl-Class-C3-XS > perl-Class-Factory-Util > perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 > perl-DBM-Deep > perl-DateTime-Format-Builder > perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL > perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple > perl-File-Slurp > perl-IO-Compress-Base > perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2 > perl-JSON-XS > perl-MRO-Compat > perl

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

2012-10-05 Thread Eric H. Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > skychart -- Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer > starlab -- A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics > starplot -- 3-dimensional perspective star map vie

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers UPDATED LIST

2012-10-05 Thread Greg Swift
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > pure-ftpd -- Lightweight, fast and secure FTP server i'll take that. fas = xaeth - greg -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Hughes
On 5 October 2012 16:19, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > 1) Software Center based on PackageKit by Matthias > 2) Light Software Center - a new app based on PackageKit from the > beginning > 3) Apper already supports AppStream [2] Basically, Fedora needs to ship Appstream metadata and then we can just inc

Update mongodb to 2.2.0 (latest release)

2012-10-05 Thread Troy Dawson
Hello, I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0. It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18. 10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible. According to their documentation "When upgrading a standalone mongod, 2.2 is a drop-in replacement." an

Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Till Maas
Hi, I noticed that the revelation security update was not pushed to stable. It is now 91 days old, which makes me suspect that Jef is somehow hindered to take care of it: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 00:32:50 +0200 Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that the revelation security update was not pushed to > stable. It is now 91 days old, which makes me suspect that Jef is > somehow hindered to take care of it: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/reve

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: > I noticed that the revelation security update was not pushed to stable. > It is now 91 days old, which makes me suspect that Jef is somehow > hindered to take care of it: Here's the problem with that update it breaks existing revelation setup

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Here's the problem with that update it breaks existing revelation > setups for people because of the gconf schema change. I'll add that the additional wrinkle is that once you move to the new version, it updates the encryption on your data

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Ugh. Shall I unpush those from going stable then until this is figured? Sorry about that... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:57:02PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > I noticed that the revelation security update was not pushed to stable. > > It is now 91 days old, which makes me suspect that Jef is somehow > > hindered to take care of it: > > H

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Ugh. Shall I unpush those from going stable then until this is figured? > > Sorry about that... I am a firm believer in the Pottery Barn rule. You break it you buy it. If you feel this is important enough of a security fix to break ui then pus

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:20:16 -0800 Jef Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Ugh. Shall I unpush those from going stable then until this is > > figured? > > > > Sorry about that... > > I am a firm believer in the Pottery Barn rule. You break it you buy > it. If

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Jef Spaleta - Unpushed security update for 91 days

2012-10-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:57 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: 25 minutes for an 'unresponsive maintainer' to respond, that has to be some sort of project record. =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | iden

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-05 Thread gil
Il 05/10/2012 19:32, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: -- Forwarded message -- From: Przemek Klosowski Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM Subject: Re: Packages in need of new maintainers To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: As a result of FESCO tick