> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral
> > wrote:
> > > Something like this? [1] [2]
> >
> > Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki
> > before
> > posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know that
Hi there,
Just to remind you that we are having our next planning meeting today,
Thursday, at 6PM UTC, #fedora-meeting.
This time is going to be used for our weekly meetings.
The current agenda is:
# hotel
# founding
# design
# other tasks
# open floor
Hope to see you later today,
--
Kévin Ra
On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Where would you like bug reports?
I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
issues however almost all of them except one was wrong.
For example it complained
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 08:23 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 12:02 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:52 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> >> Where would you like bug reports?
> >>
> >> I tried it against one of my own review tickets. It found a number of
> >>
On 08/02/2012 08:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Maybe it would be better formulated as:
[!]: MUST: Buildroot MUST NOT be present (NOTE: this is not true for
EPEL5)
[!]: MUST: Package MUST NOT run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
at the beginning of %install
What do you think?
That wo
On 08/02/2012 03:36 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 08/02/2012 08:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Maybe it would be better formulated as:
[!]: MUST: Buildroot MUST NOT be present (NOTE: this is not true for
EPEL5)
[!]: MUST: Package MUST NOT run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
at the
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
triggers:
Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates)
Requires: /lib/libkrb5.so.3
Removing: krb5-libs-1.10.2-2.fc17.i686 (@updates-testing)
Not found
Updated
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:00:17AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
>
> triggers:
>
> Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates)
>Requires: /lib/libkrb5.so.3
>Removing: krb5-libs-1.10
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:00:17AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
>
> triggers:
>
> Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates)
>Requires: /lib/libkrb5.so.3
>Removing: krb5-libs-1.10
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:03:08PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:00:17AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
> >
> > triggers:
> >
> > Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-3.17 is|perl-Mojolicious-3.18 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
--- Comment #74 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Latest upstream release: 3.18
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 3.17
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mojolicious/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
s
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:04:34AM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:00:17AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11388/krb5-1.10.2-5.fc1
> >
> > triggers:
> >
> > Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.18.5-2.fc17.i686 (updates)
>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:12:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:04:34AM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> > Whether it does or not, I'm rebuilding the candidate update without this
> > change, since I'd rather not introduce dependency breakage after
> > release.
>
>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:15:09AM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:12:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:04:34AM -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> > > Whether it does or not, I'm rebuilding the candidate update without this
> > > change, si
commit efaa4364498f9d9a18773ef283df6cce9d3fd6a1
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Thu Aug 2 17:15:45 2012 +0200
Bundle 0.714 IO modules to fix dependency breakage
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.715-IO-modules.patch | 425 +
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |9 +-
2 fil
On 07/11/2012 06:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A new fedora-review is being brought to you.
For me it fails like this:
$ fedora-review -v -n octave-odepkg
Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2012-08-03
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Thanks to jreznik for the reminder that it's that time again: time to
start in on blocker review meetings for Fedora 18. Crack your knuckles,
eve
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-XS:
6a1eafeadc1680a806ec2eb1798f6084 JSON-XS-2.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:12:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It really depends on those file paths, and if the files move, it
> breaks. Previously discussed below, and the status is still now
> essentially the same as it was then:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 05:54:46PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> "nomodeset" doesn't help or change anything unfortunately..
Try with noapic?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/02/2012 06:15 PM, José Matos wrote:
On 07/11/2012 06:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
A new fedora-review is being brought to you.
For me it fails like this:
$ fedora-review -v -n octave-odepkg
Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pyt
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2012-07-31 at 22:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I'm looking into these:
>>
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Package komparator (fails to build)
> can't resolve this fail
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde
> -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THR
I just did
/usr/bin/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm
after having flushed /var/cache/mock, so that current packages would get
pulled down. Or so I thought. When the build failed and I went to find
out why, I discovered that it had supplied me with an ancient l
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:23:57 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> We'll be running through the beta blockers and nice-to-haves. An
> updated list of blocker bugs should soon be available: tflink is still
> working on a replacement for the current blocker bugs page, but he
> says he'll have something up
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 20:13:18 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm still hoping to kill libpng-compat (and libtiff-compat) before we
branch F18.
Should libpng12 obsolete libpng-compat?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 20:13:18 -0400,
>Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm still hoping to kill libpng-compat (and libtiff-compat) before we
>> branch F18.
> Should libpng12 obsolete libpng-compat?
Doh. I didn't think about that, but you're probably right.
Bill Nottingham writes:
> Package man-pages-ko (orphan)
I have taken ownership of this one.
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
28 matches
Mail list logo
