Hi.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:10:48 + (UTC), Petr Pisar wrote:
> How could they have changed the license without asking contributors?
> I have periodically translated the messages, I believe I have some
> patches there and nobody had asked me.
I did get asked about some (rather trivial) function
Hi.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:16:31 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> See:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware
Question about that:
The first requirement is that the file is non-executable. Does that mean that
Fedora cannot ship firmware for hardware that has a C
On 07/06/2012 09:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package svnmailer (orphan)
I've taken svnmailer in all branches. Co-maintainers very welcome (hint).
Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2012-07-09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:10:48 + (UTC), Petr Pisar wrote:
>
>> > As of 3.3-beta1, Audacious is now officially under a two-clause BSD
>> > license (previously GPLv3). Some plugins (separate package) are still
>> > under other licenses, however.
>>
>> How c
On 07/10/2012 03:20 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: raptor
flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1
flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17
flickcurl-devel require
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:54:12 -0400,
Marc Dionne wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Added an automatic test in the dracut testsuite, so that this never happens
again.. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes, rawhide sometimes eats babies.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
Hi,
On 07/06/2012 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package vorbisspi (fails to build)
Fixed.
Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:15:19 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:10:48 + (UTC), Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > How could they have changed the license without asking contributors?
> > I have periodically translated the messages, I believe I have some
> > patches there and n
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:00:50 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:30:50 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> > What if the main creators of the software prefer acknowledging substantial
> > contributions with proper attribution and copyright notice in the file
> > preambles?
>
>
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:03:02 + (UTC), Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Have you had your name and a copyright statement in any source file?
>
> Obviously not. I just remember some patches into plugins and they have
> been removed probably.
The plugins are a different source package and a different Fedo
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Package devtodo (orphan)
I will take this package.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
If you have the latest Rawhide, could you try the very simple test
described in the comment?
You will need to install the latest 'systemd' & 'systemd-debuginfo'
packages; my suspicion is that the latter is broken.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838793#c2
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, V
On 07/04/2012 12:13 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
opencv-2.4.1 is already in Rawhide git, but not built yet, which will be
done in few days though. Since 2.4.1 bumps soname, the following
packages need to be rebuilt:
player
digikam
mrpt
fawkes
frei0r-plugins
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
php-facedetect
U
Well, false alarm, possibly.
It turns out that valgrind won't work yet with the new
compressed DWARF that gcc is generating, so something to
watch out for if you're using Rawhide. (I also noticed
that gdb had problems, although it didn't segfault).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 15:30 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 03:21 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions merged,
> >> > don't gain any copyright protection on the file or the proper parts of
> >> > it,
> > I don't think this is true
Hello.
I'm again offering a review for trade. You'll review this one and I'll
review yours:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/823170 - leveldb - A fast and
lightweight key/value database library by Google
This is a C++ library intended for the developers. I added autotools
build system and built it a
On 07/10/2012 01:33 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:16:31 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> See:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware
>
> Question about that:
>
> The first requirement is that the file is non-executable. Does that
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:08 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm again offering a review for trade. You'll review this one and I'll
> review yours:
>
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/823170 - leveldb - A fast and
> lightweight key/value database library by Google
>
> This is a C++ library i
On 07/10/2012 07:06 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 15:30 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 03:21 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions merged,
> don't gain any copyright protection on the file or the proper parts o
On 07/10/2012 05:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This may be another chance for smartasses to jump in with general legal
> pedantry, but I don't consider that helpful.
All accurate legal interpretations are essentially "pedantry".
What I don't consider helpful is making broad generalizations abo
Am 09.07.2012 23:17, schrieb Matt Spaulding:
> I'm having trouble logging into the Koji website.
>
> I ran "fedora-packager-setup" on the command line and generated my certs,
> including the browser cert for Firefox. I then followed the instructions on
> the wiki to import the cert into my browser
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:53:14AM -0500, Jiri Popelka wrote:
> This soname bump has been an upstream error.
> Please rebuild (again) cinepaint and photoprint once this gets into rawhide.
> Thanks.
Photoprint is rebuilt for rawhide now.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838679
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Thanks for the comprehensive summary. Looks like this will be a though one.
About the missing PPC64 packages, this is a pain, but that can be dealt with.
About the test suites, I think it should be acceptab
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:57:52 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 05:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > This may be another chance for smartasses to jump in with general legal
> > pedantry, but I don't consider that helpful.
>
> All accurate legal interpretations are essentially "pedantry".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838679
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #3 from
Hi,
Have the ufs / affs and other file systems been intentionally dropped
from the F17 kernel, or is that just an oversight?
--
Ian Chapman.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Rawhide Report (rawh...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> Compose started at Tue Jul 10 08:15:02 UTC 2012
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [gnucash]
> gnucash-2.4.10-4.fc17.x86_64 requires libofx.so.4()(64bit)
> [grisbi]
> grisb
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:21:12PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Pedantry alone wouldn't be a bad thing. Lack of accuracy is what makes it
> bad. Combine pedantry with accuracy, and this thread may become helpful.
> But instead, there is a lot of speculation and assumptions, and
> rose-coloured
commit 7ebd378dc372d774519584051607ccaee7367d92
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jul 10 15:52:45 2012 +0100
Fix breakage with Perl::Tidy ≥ 20120619 (CPAN RT#77977)
Perl-Critic-1.117-tidy.patch | 41 +
perl-Perl-Critic.spec| 14 +++-
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:50:44PM +0800, Ian Chapman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have the ufs / affs and other file systems been intentionally
> dropped from the F17 kernel, or is that just an oversight?
Nothing is mentioned in the changelog, so it would be an
oversight. But which precise kernel are you h
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> Static-only -devel packages with a virtual -static package name are
> shipped as multilib already anyway (and -static packages with a virtual
> -devel package name probably, too, in case mash takes a look at virtual
> package names).
It does not (arg
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Ian Chapman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have the ufs / affs and other file systems been intentionally dropped from
> the F17 kernel, or is that just an oversight?
They're still there but they've been moved to the kernel-modules-extra
sub package.
Peter
--
devel mailing lis
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:50:44PM +0800, Ian Chapman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have the ufs / affs and other file systems been intentionally
>> dropped from the F17 kernel, or is that just an oversight?
>
> Nothing is mentioned in the change
On 07/10/2012 08:39 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:50:44PM +0800, Ian Chapman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Have the ufs / affs and other file systems been intentionally
>>> dropped from the F17 kernel, or is that just
I just got the following:
grib_api has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/ksh
On i386:
grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.i686 requires /usr/bin/ksh
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
after I decided to stop changing the
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:57:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Saying things like:
>
> "and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions merged,
> don't gain any copyright protection on the file or the proper parts of
> it,"
>
> is inaccurate and dangerous. It's entirely appropriate
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:57:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > Saying things like:
> >
> > "and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions merged,
> > don't gain any copyright protection on the file or the prope
Am 10.07.2012 17:18, schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> I just got the following:
>
> grib_api has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/ksh
> On i386:
> grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.i686 requires /usr/bin/ksh
> Please resolve this as soo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838679
--- Comment #4 from Jose Pedro Oliveira ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the comprehensive summary. Looks like this will be a though one.
> About the missing PPC64 packages, this is a pain, but that can be dealt with.
This problem appea
On 2012-07-09 10:54, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Package html401-dtds (orphan)
>> comaintained by: gnat
>
> Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora?
No. We're in progress of transfering the ownership of this package from
me to gnat,
On 07/10/2012 10:29 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-07-09 10:54, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package html401-dtds (orphan)
comaintained by: gnat
Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora?
No. We're in progress of transfering the ow
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:52:19 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:57:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > Saying things like:
> > >
> > > "and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions m
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:57:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> Saying things like:
>>
>> "and arbitrary other people, who get their patch contributions merged,
>> don't gain any copyright protection on the file or the proper parts of
>>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:12:45PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 10.07.2012 17:18, schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> > Shouldn't that be /usr/ as well. Will it cause problems if it doesn't match
> > with the /etc/passwd entry?
> >
> >
>
> yes, /etc/shells might be a problem... I would suggest:
>
>
Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday
as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts:
devilspie
dogtail
gtkmm-utils
k12linux-quick-start-guide
kcoloredit
kgrab
kiconedit
koverartist
ksig
libzip
polyester
polyester3
python-djblets
pyth
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:12:01PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I'd love to take advice from you, but with your overly brief comments
> you're unconvincing. I don't think copyright law is as simple as to cover
> it with one-line mails.
The only advice I'm offering is to tell you that it's dan
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:19:09 -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
> Copyright is automatic under Berne.
Which only means that you don't need to apply for copyright at any
government office.
But copyright on _what_? What comprises a "copyright work"? Single words?
Single lines of code? Trivial/obvious code
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:38 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> kcoloredit
I think I've missed some mails, but this is a very useful application,
is there any alternative?
Cheers,
Mario
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/10/2012 11:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:19:09 -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
Copyright is automatic under Berne.
Which only means that you don't need to apply for copyright at any
government office.
But copyright on _what_? What comprises a "copyright work"? Single
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday
> as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts:
>
> devilspie
I've taken devilspie, but just that it's not removed from fedora since I
think it's often useful to Xfce us
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 20:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:19:09 -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
>
> > Copyright is automatic under Berne.
>
> Which only means that you don't need to apply for copyright at any
> government office.
>
> But copyright on _what_? What comprises a
Is there a build compatible with WM8650 ARM 926 EJ-S or Cortex Nuvoton M0?
Regards,
Rahul.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
> The Fedora ARM team is pleased to announce that the Fedora 17 GA release
> for ARM is now available for download from:
>
> http://download.fedoraproje
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday
> as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts:
> kcoloredit
> kiconedit
> libzip
I can help with these.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> python-flask
> python-werkzeug
>
>
I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will
land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer.
As a matter of fact, I would have taken ownership if i had been
notified that they were orphaned, but
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:30:16PM +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> > python-flask
> > python-werkzeug
> >
> >
>
> I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will
> land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer.
> As a matter of fact,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:20:32 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Can you stop the useless hyperbole ?
Sure, can the useless generalization and pedantry stop, too?
> The reason why nobody is telling you a hard rule is that there are no
> hard rules, but often it will be decided on case by case basis.
He
Le 10/07/2012 20:42, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
>
> Sorry about that -- it was easier for me to make these mass changes in the
> database than through the pkgdb application so no notifications went out.
> I know that the person who picked up the packages did so because he needed
> them for things he
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:30:16 +0200, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> > python-flask
> > python-werkzeug
> >
> >
>
> I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will
> land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer.
> As a matter of fact, I wou
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:52:19 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:57:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > I wrote that in the context of files giving credit to *some* people
>> [*],
>> > which could (!)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with
> 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as*
> *a* *matter* *of* *law* copyright infringement had occurred for those 9
> lines.
Yes. And a
Le 10/07/2012 21:07, Michael Schwendt a écrit :
>
> Could you please respond to
> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/python-feedparser
> in particular the aging NEEDINFO query in #787401 that addresses you?
>
I'm looking that issue right now.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
Hi.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:52:28 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote
> Do we have any such firmware at all? Let's stick to practical issues.
Wei don't, as far as I am aware. But with Intel actually preparing
to ship Xeon Phi hardware we might sooner than later.
--
"The creatures looked from pig to ma
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Yes. And also told Oracle that it was very limited what they could
> claim as damage caused by the copyright infringement over those 9
> lines.
Very limited in the context of billion dollar lawsuits.
Statutory infringement for commercial u
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:48:52PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
> > Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with
> > 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as*
> > *a* *matter* *of*
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:33:26 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with
> 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as*
> *a* *matter* *of* *law* copyright infringement had occurred for those 9
> lines.
>
> htt
On Ter, 2012-07-10 at 02:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2012-07-09 at 05:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Removing: raptor
> > > flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1
> > > flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
>> Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with
>> 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as*
>> *a* *matter* *of* *law* copyright infringement had occurred for those 9
>> lines.
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:33:26 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>> Please consider that in the Oracle vs Google case, Oracle ended up with
>> 9-line copying (plus a few test files), and the judge decided that *as*
>> *a* *matter* *of* *law* copyright infringement had occurred for those 9
>> lines.
68 matches
Mail list logo
