Dear Fedora developers,
I'm one of the main developer of the Mozilla MathML Project. As
explained here
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Mozilla_MathML_Project/Fonts
http://www.maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic/?post/2012/04/21/Mozilla-MathML-Project%3A-about-mathematical-fonts
math
Hi,
After some procrastination time I've bumped STIX fonts to 1.1 in Rawhide.
This is a major release (1 year and a half work upstream IIRC)
The font layout and naming has been changed to something approaching
sanity, and the complexfont piles only TEX ma
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
devel mailing
Hi,
After some time procrastinating I've finally bumped STIX fonts to 1.1.0 in
Rawhide.
This is a major update (1 years and a half work upstream IIRC)
Gone is the huge pile of files only TEX macros could beat some sense in,
the new font layout finally approaches sanity. The cons being that if
yo
2012/7/7 Jerry James :
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
>>> coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
>>> coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.f
Hi Frédéric,
1. Stix and Asana have been available in Fedora for a long time
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/oflb-asana-math-fonts
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/stix-fonts
If you have a problem with them please file a bug
2. MathJax if the usual TEXie badly name
Hi to all,
my name is Robert Mayr, alias robyduck [1], and I'm a Fedora user
since the Core 1b release. Before that I used Redhat 7.3, but only
sporadically.
In January 2005 I founded the Italian Fedora community Fedora Online
[2] and I'm actually also in the websites group and gitmuffin.
I'
hi,
License is very restrictive.
Please remove them from the distribution.
--cut--
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ BEFORE INSTALLING OR USING THIS INTEL(C) SOFTWARE
Do not use or load this firmware (the "Software") until you have carefully read
the following terms and conditio
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> hi,
>
> License is very restrictive.
> Please remove them from the distribution.
>
>
... and for those with that wireless hardware running Fedora what are
they supposed to use instead if there is no open source alternative?
--
mike c
Has something changed with the license on them since they were reviewed
5 or so years ago?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217351
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217350
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware
If you think it's fail
On 07/06/2012 02:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> pnasrat 'Paul Nasrat'
pinged
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 7 July 2012 10:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
>> coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
>> coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
>> coq-emacs requires emacs-pro
On Sex, 2012-07-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Removing: raptor
> flickcurl requires libraptor.so.1
> flickcurl requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17
> flickcurl-devel requires raptor-devel = 1.4.21-11.fc17
> flickcurl-devel requires pkgconfig(raptor) = 1.4.21
> li
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-07-09
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Well, we've skipped meetings for the last couple of weeks as there was
nothing much to discuss, but t
13 matches
Mail list logo