I'm trying to follow up on struts,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=239819
is the last mention I can see of it.
yum with *testing shows nothing.
How can I find if it's orphaned?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
On 05/26/2012 10:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
I'm trying to follow up on struts,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=239819
is the last mention I can see of it.
yum with *testing shows nothing.
How can I find if it's orphaned?
Hi,
you could checkout the pkgdb:
https://admin.fed
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:35:57 +0200, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > jan.kratochvil wrote:
> > > If your feature does not solve any problem it is just a bloat.
> >
> > This overstates the case. Alex's proposal clearly solves some proble
Compose started at Sat May 26 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
2012/5/24 Michal Schmidt :
> On 05/24/2012 03:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>> So is F17 going to support TRIM w/LUKS automatically?
>>
>> Or do we need to perform some special configuration to get TRIM
>> w/LUKS? (Yes, I understand some attacker might be able to guess my
>> filesystem type due to e
On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:50:31 +0200, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> - You're in IRC or email, and all the bug reporter has given you is a
> random copy and paste from their terminal. They don't care to open
> a bug; they don't much care about anything except getting a fix.
>
> Minidebuginfo would
Hello.
This package was retired for some time and now it was re-enabled (see
review request in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/810205 ). Unfortunately
it still can't be built for F-17 anf F-18. Koji fails and returns
quite cryptic messages like this one - "FAILED: BuildError: package
erlang-erlzmq2 i
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This package was retired for some time and now it was re-enabled (see
> review request in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/810205 ). Unfortunately
> it still can't be built for F-17 anf F-18. Koji fails and returns
> quite cryptic mess
On 05/25/2012 08:27 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Why have more than one gcc or binutils for arm-eabi at all? Just add
multilibs for the extra variants of interest. You can even split the
multilibs out into subpackages if it matters.
This is simply not true. A gcc targeting glibc/linux is entirely
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'll add one more case, which seems to happen to me all the time:
>
> - You're in IRC or email, and all the bug reporter has given you is a
> random copy and paste from their terminal. They don't care to open
> a bug; they don't much
10 matches
Mail list logo