On 6 May 2012 03:19, "Braden McDaniel" wrote:
>
> Does mock have problems with non-local user accounts? When I do
>
>$ fedpkg mockbuild
>
> I get:
>
>ERROR: Must be member of 'mock' group to run mock! (['users'])
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/sb
Compose started at Sun May 6 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(
Compose started at Sun May 6 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 09:34 +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On 6 May 2012 03:19, "Braden McDaniel" wrote:
> >
> > Does mock have problems with non-local user accounts? When I do
> >
> >$ fedpkg mockbuild
> >
> > I get:
> >
> >ERROR: Must be member of 'mock' group to run mock!
> (['us
2012/5/6 Michel Alexandre Salim :
> Hi all,
>
> LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
> (with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example)
> that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself.
>
> I'd love to have some extra help her
I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5.
This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level
incompatibilities, as detailed at
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v4.0.0.html
By my count there are about a hundred dependent packages (see list
below), so to avo
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Some months ago I requested commit on the el6 branch of djvulibre, but
the package owner (cc'd) hasn't responded. Please can someone grant me
commit access so I can make some updates?
There's a process to be followed for this kind of issue:
http://fedoraproject.org/wi
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-05-07
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's time to meet once more. We need to be rolling Fedora 17 release
candidates soon, so we should do
On 05/06/2012 06:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5.
This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level
incompatibilities, as detailed at
http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v4.0.0.html
By my count there are about a hundred depe
