On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 14:00 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 22:13 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
> [... snip ...]
> > Desktop:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
>
On 4 May 2012 23:44, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> I was having trouble building one of my packages for EL6 and I noticed
>> it was failing during man file generation using help2man.
>>
>> It turns out that the cmake macros in EL6 use
>> "-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON" where Fedora doe
Compose started at Sat May 5 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
Hi,
I just sent the email below to the EPEL list, but am forwarding it here as well.
Cheers,
Jonathan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jonathan Underwood
Date: 5 May 2012 16:59
Subject: Approving commit access for djvulibre
To: EPEL development disccusion
Cc: pie...@gcarrier.fr
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> On 4 May 2012 23:44, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> I was having trouble building one of my packages for EL6 and I noticed
>>> it was failing during man file generation using help2man.
>>>
>>> It turns out that the cmake
Hi Jan:
I just ran this; what qualifies as an "unmatched entry"? How am I to spot
one?
Richard
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > i do not speak about pushig them to updates-testing or even stable
> > i speak about "give me a koji-build which i can
never-mind. I found them; I was just being lazy.
Jan: How do you want me to report these?
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Jan:
>
> I just ran this; what qualifies as an "unmatched entry"? How am I to spot
> one?
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Micha
- Selinux Audit Begin
**Unmatched Entries**
type=1131 audit(1335206040.736:102): pid=0 uid=0 auid=4294967295
ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg=' comm="mcelog"
exe="/bin/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=failed'
type=1131
Does mock have problems with non-local user accounts? When I do
$ fedpkg mockbuild
I get:
ERROR: Must be member of 'mock' group to run mock! (['users'])
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/mock", line 520, in
def do_buildsrpm(config_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
LLVM is becoming an increasingly integral part of our distribution
(with mesa now using it to build the LLVMpipe renderer, for example)
that I don't really feel comfortable maintaining it mostly by myself.
I'd love to have some extra help her
10 matches
Mail list logo
