Il 28 aprile 2012 19:02, Michael Schwendt ha scritto:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:31:59 +1000, GG (Guido) wrote:
>
>> To go back to initial proposal of
>> revitalizing sponsor role, I think it would also be a good thing,
>> given that we leverage on new possible sponsor responsibilities
>> (ie, super
On 29 April 2012 01:05, Richard Vickery wrote:
> On 2012-04-26 10:50 AM, "Michał Piotrowski" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> napisał:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade?
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Has anyone
Compose started at Sun Apr 29 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:53:19PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> New problem is that the successfully installed system (from LiveCD ISO
> burned to DVD-RW media), upon reboot, does not eject the disc, rather
> it boots from it not the HDD. When I reboot with option key at the
> startup chime, I'
Compose started at Sun Apr 29 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:31:43 +1000, GG (Guido) wrote:
> > That's no new responsibilities. Sponsors have always been expected to do
> > that. With pkgdb, it requires "watch*" access to the packages. Else
> > it requires subscribing to the scm-commits list and filtering by
> > username/packagename.
On 04/27/2012 07:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13:47AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I'm going to add a switch to allow packages to control the behavior
anyway. Whether rpm upstream defaults to the traditional behavior for
compatibility reasons or not is another quest
On 04/29/2012 06:13 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/27/2012 07:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13:47AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I'm going to add a switch to allow packages to control the behavior
anyway. Whether rpm upstream defaults to the traditional behavior f
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:53:19PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> New problem is that the successfully installed system (from LiveCD ISO
>> burned to DVD-RW media), upon reboot, does not eject the disc, rather
>> it boots from it not the H
Hi,
Zotero is a referencing tool that helps the user collecting,
maintaining and generating citations from research papers and so on.
Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a standalone
executable (previously a Firefox plugin) based on the XULRunner
runtime; and I'm thinking about p
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #839 Proposal for revitalizing the packager
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817419 .
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:19 +0100
> Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
> Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a standalone
> executable (previously a Firefox plugin) based on the XULRunner
> runtime; and I'm thinking about packaging it for Fedora.
User's feedback only. That's great news! Tha
13 matches
Mail list logo
