Re: Headup : soname bump in libmemcached 1.0.6 (rawhide)

Le 21/04/2012 17:18, Remi Collet a écrit : > libmemcached 1.0.6, just build in rawhide, now provides > > libhashkit.so.2 > libmemcached.so.10 > > I will try to rebuild dependencies asap. Same Player Shoot Again. Need to rebuild again because previous build have loose SASL support...

node.js rpm and looking for an sponsor

Hello Guys, Am new on fedora but I built RPMs since 2007 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian Am looking for an sponsor to push node.js RPM http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/ I already open a ticket in bugzilla Bug 815018 - Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework C

Re: node.js rpm and looking for an sponsor

Le dimanche 22 avril 2012 à 10:53 -0300, Adrian Alves a écrit : > Hello Guys, > Am new on fedora but I built RPMs since 2007 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian > > > Am looking for an sponsor to push node.js RPM > http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/ > > > I already open a ticket

Subject: Schedule for monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-04-23)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #829 New proven packagers request: Pav

Re: node.js rpm and looking for an sponsor

check my spec i dont use a bundle, check how i built it On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le dimanche 22 avril 2012 à 10:53 -0300, Adrian Alves a écrit : > > Hello Guys, > > Am new on fedora but I built RPMs since 2007 > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian

encuentro rpm and looking for an sponsor - Bug 814887

Hello Guys, Am new on fedora but I built RPMs since 2007 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian Am looking for an sponsor to push node.js RPM http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/ I already open a ticket in bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814887 Can anyone help me?

GPT

I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all preexisting partitions, but it creates an msdos partition table instead of gpt. Is something changed on the default anaconda configuration since F16

Re: GPT

On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD > (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all > preexisting partitions, but it creates an msdos partition table instead of > gpt. > > Is

Re: node.js rpm and looking for an sponsor

On 22.4.2012 15:53, Adrian Alves wrote: I already open a ticket in bugzilla Bug 815018 - Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework I really have to warn you against doing this. I was trying to help to T.C.Hollingsworth on bug 634911 and we gave up in disgust. NodeJS is quite in

Re: GPT

On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > >> I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all preexisting partitions, but it creates an

Re: GPT

On 22/04/12 18:04, Nikos Roussos wrote: I'm wondering if there is a grub option to force gpt for anaconda. Unsure, I've always formatted as GPT (if applicable) before install. -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: GPT

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:04:48PM +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote: > It's a lenovo thinkpad (edge). I remember a bug about some thinkpad models > having problem with gpt, but it would seem to me as an extreme action if > all lenovo models were blacklisted. Gpt was working just fine on F16 on the > same

Re: GPT

On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > It's a lenovo thinkpad (edge). I remember a bug about some thinkpad models > having problem with gpt, but it would seem to me as an extreme action if all > lenovo models were blacklisted. Gpt was working just fine on F16 on the same > hardwar

Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

Hi, the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: > Hi, > the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because > libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. I believe the samba 3 package needs an epoch bump to come out of this cleanly: https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

Am 22.04.2012 19:53, schrieb Kalev Lember: > On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Hi, >> the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because >> libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. > > I believe the samba 3 package needs an epoch bump to c

Re: GPT

> Is there a compelling reason to want GPT? The format itself is better > than MBR, but unless I required (a) disk > 2TB or (b) lots of primary > partitions, I wouldn't worry ... GPT is more robust in some ways. GPT keeps a redundant copy of its info: at the far end as well as at the beginning.

Re: GPT

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:23:55AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > Is there a compelling reason to want GPT? The format itself is better > > than MBR, but unless I required (a) disk > 2TB or (b) lots of primary > > partitions, I wouldn't worry ... > > GPT is more robust in some ways. GPT keeps a r

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Heiko Adams wrote: Subject: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. Additionally, "software update" availa

F-17 Branched report: 20120422 changes

Compose started at Sun Apr 22 15:53:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 [aeolus-configserver] aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch require

Re: node.js rpm and looking for an sponsor

Then delete it in %prep or %setup to be sure. 22.04.2012 18:07, Adrian Alves wrote: check my spec i dont use a bundle, check how i built it On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michael Scherer > wrote: Le dimanche 22 avril 2012 à 10:53 -0300, Adrian Alves a écrit :

matio ABI change

Hi, Is it possible for a provenpackager to bump alsa-plugins to release 3 in f17 and later and submit an update. This is a trivial fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806218 Thx Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: matio ABI change

2012/4/22 Nicolas Chauvet : > Hi, > > Is it possible for a provenpackager to bump alsa-plugins to release 3 > in f17 and later and submit an update. > > This is a trivial fix > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806218 > > Thx > > Nicolas (kwizart) Sorry, there was a misstake in the top

Re: GPT

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > It's a lenovo thinkpad (edge). I remember a bug about some thinkpad models > having problem with gpt, but it would seem to me as an extreme action if all > lenovo models were blacklisted.

Re: GPT

> I already have a GPT partition (from my previous installation), but > Anaconda complains that my boot partition should be of type msdos. The > only way to proceed seems to be discarding all partitions and creating > an msdos partition table. It worked for me on a "white-box clone" with exactly o

Re: GPT

On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:04 +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote: > On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 PM, "Chris Murphy" > wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > > >> I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta > Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to us

Re: GPT

On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 11:20 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > > It's a lenovo thinkpad (edge). I remember a bug about some thinkpad > > models having problem with gpt, but it would seem to me as an > > extreme action if all lenovo models were black

Re: GPT

On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > I already have a GPT partition (from my previous installation), but > Anaconda complains that my boot partition should be of type msdos. The > only way to proceed seems to be discarding all partitions and creating > an msdos partition table. We

general problem -> Re: Fedora 16 and the 3.3.1-3 kernel

Am 23.04.2012 01:02, schrieb Bill Davidsen: >> udevd[187]: timeout '/sbin/blkid -o udev -p /dev/sda3' >> udevd[187]: timeout: killing '/sbin/blkid -o udev -p /dev/sda3' [332] >> udevd[187]: timeout: killing '/sbin/blkid -o udev -p /dev/sda3' [332] >> udevd[187]: '/sbin/blkid -o udev -p /dev/sda3'

[RFE] Newer ETL version needed to build synfig and synfigstudio

I submitted a bug report[1] about ETL because upstream recently released a newer version. As a result, synfig and synfigstudio will not built and depend to this new version of ETL. Since Lubomir is busy, can someone rebuild ETL? Regards, Ref: [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8149

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 20:53:35 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: Hi, the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. I believe the samba 3 package needs an epoch

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:53 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: > > Hi, > > the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because > > libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. > > I believe the samba 3 package needs an

Re: general problem -> Re: Fedora 16 and the 3.3.1-3 kernel

On Apr 22, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> > > no 3.3.1 is the current one, 3.3.2 is current > > but the whole 3.3 line until now elaborates on the same problem > not at each boot, mostly only slower but terrible at all > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806548 > https:/

Re: rawhide report: 20120422 changes

Hi, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > Compose started at Sun Apr 22 15:54:03 UTC 2012 > [fontmatrix] >        fontmatrix-0.9.99-3.r1218.fc18.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.48()(64bit) >        fontmatrix-0.9.99-3.r1218.fc18.x86_64 requires libiculx.so.48()(64bit) >