-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 06:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> On 04/04/2012 06:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> What I think would be really helpful would be a menu item (next
>>> to the liveinst one) on the live images which does the same
>>> m
On 04/04/2012 06:40 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:30:51 +0800, DY (Dave) wrote:
>
>> On 04/03/2012 01:22 PM, Dave Young wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/31/2012 02:12 AM, Linda Wang wrote:
>>>
per Fedora team members:
>
> There is a simple process for this already, using th
Hi,
When I testing kdump, the vmcore is successfully captured in
/sysroot/var/crash which is the /var/crash in rootfs. But after reboot
it disappeared.
Any idea about this?
--
Thanks
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 05:28:10PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 06:40 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:30:51 +0800, DY (Dave) wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/03/2012 01:22 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/31/2012 02:12 AM, Linda Wang wrote:
> >>>
> per Fedora
Compose started at Thu Apr 5 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> > All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
>> > kernel SRPM and enabled by default in the spec file. Each kernel must
>> > be built in a timely manner
I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
fiddling randomly with packages until it goes away).
The latest one:
# yum install /usr/sbin/libvirtd
[... yum spew deleted ...]
Error: Protected multilib versions:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>> > All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
>>> > kernel SRPM and enabled by default in the spe
I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
Worked like a charm.
However, now that I try to use the resulting system and need a
few packages, I find that installing them is um, ... challenging.
For example, yesterday I co
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
> what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
> fiddling randomly with packages until it goes away).
>
> The latest one:
>
> # yum install /usr/sbin/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Circular build dependency in perl-POE-1.352-1.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810234
Summary: Circular build dependency in perl-POE-1.352-1.fc1
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:41 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
>> what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
>> fiddling randomly with packages until it goes aw
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Detecting and mounting the file systems is straightforward and that's
> what anaconda does. I read the request as wanting to also make the
> live environment chroot into the detected sysimage and start the
> system up interactively from there. That seems harder but maybe it'
Peter Robinson wrote:
> It's clear you don't want ARM as a primary arch and I'm sure you'll
> dig out any random package and add it as a blocker to ensure that is a
> case. It's up to FESCo to define what they wish, once that has
> happened we will work towards ensure we meet that.
All the issues
Josh Boyer wrote:
> (Max build time for the kernel: 4 hours).
Wow, if they can achieve that, I'll be impressed, though I'm worried it'll
probably be achieved through a kernel-specific cheat (like building only a
monolithic kernel for QEMU with no modules at all, and using custom kernels
built s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810243
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2012 01:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> Detecting and mounting the file systems is straightforward and
>> that's what anaconda does. I read the request as wanting to also
>> make the live environment chroot into the detec
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:23:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
> what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
> fiddling randomly with packages until it goes away).
>
> The latest one:
>
> # yum install
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:40 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
> a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
> Worked like a charm.
>
> However, now that I try to use the resulting system and need a
> few packages, I find that i
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:23:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
> > what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
> > fiddling randoml
>> # yum install /usr/sbin/libvirtd
>> Error: Protected multilib versions: libvirt-client-0.9.10-2.fc17.i686 !=
>> libvirt-client-0.9.10-3.fc17.x86_64
>> What does the error mean?
> ...
Or, some packager forgot to use %{?_isa} when specifying package dependencies
which are [or become] architect
Could someone please tell me why the install DVD for F17 is smaller than
that for earlier releases. The install DVD is 2.3 GB whereas the one for
F16, for example, is 3.5 GB. Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit 018d07665222f36299b5e44099fe3d6d3f5fd8cf
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Thu Apr 5 16:05:59 2012 +0200
Remove POE::Test::Loops deps
perl-POE.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-POE.spec b/perl-POE.spec
index ddeb980..ba9497d 1006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810234
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I still get this error several times a week, and I still have no idea
what it means or how I'm supposed to respond to it (other than
fiddling randomly with packages until it goes away).
The latest one:
# yum install /usr/sbin/libvirtd
[... yum spew
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:40 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
>> a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
>> Worked like a charm.
>>
>> However, now that I try to use the resulting system and need a
>>
Hi everyone!
I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262
What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL.
However, I am unable to contact the maintainer for a long time, by any
means.
Could another mainta
Le 05/04/2012 01:42, Ken Dreyer a écrit :
>> What do you think of
>>
>>
>>Require all denied
>>
>>
>>deny from all
>>
>>
>> mod_authz_core is only present in httpd >= 2.4
>> IfModule is part of "Core", so should be present in all case.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810234
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810243
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-05
10:21:22 EDT ---
perl-Config-Validator-0.4-1.el5 has been submitted as an u
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262
>
> What is required is a build of a small and simple package for EPEL.
> However, I am unable to contact
>> -Requires: libgomp = %{version}-%{release}
>> +Requires: libgomp%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> Can anyone explain why appending that %{?_isa} notation is necessary?
Because rpm did not adapt appropriately to multilib. Instead
current rpm requires that each packager do the work in each pac
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 16:13 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks.
> Can anyone explain why appending that %{?_isa} notation is necessary?
> Shouldn't dependency-tracking tools already know that libgomp is
> an arch-dependent binary, and that of course if gcc.x86_64 is depending
> on libgomp, it rea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810243
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-05
10:23:38 EDT ---
perl-Config-Validator-0.4-1.fc16 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE pulls in perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810297
Summary: perl-POE pulls in perl-devel
Product: Fedora
Vers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810223
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2012-04-05 10:54:19 EDT ---
Thank you for finding this cycle, however I believe I've already fixe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810297
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 04/05/2012 05:13 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:40 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
Worked like a charm.
However, now that I try to use th
On 04/05/2012 05:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The point with %{_isa} in dependency names is that it eliminates the
problematic ambiguity.
Really? I think %{_isa} is harmful, because it breaks ->
updates, and tries to project depsolver bugs into rpms.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
On 04/05/2012 06:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 05:13 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Can anyone explain why appending that %{?_isa} notation is necessary?
>> Shouldn't dependency-tracking tools already know that libgomp is
>> an arch-dependent binary, and that of course if gcc.x86_64 is
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:40 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
> a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
> Worked like a charm.
[...]
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> gcc-c++-4.7.0-0.20.fc17.x8
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
> >
> > I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771262
> >
>
> The EL6 branch 0.5.2 and EL5 has 0.4.3 in git a
Outage: fedorahosted.org - 2012-04-09 21:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2012-04-09 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2012-04-09 21:00 UTC'
Reason for ou
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>> >
>> > I would like to call your attention to the following bug:
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 14:40 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I installed x86_64 F17 from the netinst.iso yesterday, selected
>> a minimal install, and immediately upgraded to rawhide.
>> Worked like a charm.
> [...]
>> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
>>
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 10:52 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 16:13 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> > Thanks.
> > Can anyone explain why appending that %{?_isa} notation is necessary?
> > Shouldn't dependency-tracking tools already know that libgomp is
> > an arch-dependent binary,
commit 97b56161d187013caa423da8e928067cce629375
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Apr 5 18:15:05 2012 +0100
Don't run the release tests when bootstrapping, tidy up
- Don't run the release tests when bootstrapping, to avoid circular build
deps
- Sync buildreqs with upstream:
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 12:10 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 10:52 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > So, at least on my F17 machine, gcc looks like this:
> >
> > black-lotus:~% rpm -q --requires gcc | grep gomp
> > libgomp = 4.7.0-1.fc17
> > libgomp.so.1()(64bit)
> >
> > To me th
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Caghan Demirci wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I would like to call your attention to
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:32:47AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> >> # yum install /usr/sbin/libvirtd
>
> >> Error: Protected multilib versions: libvirt-client-0.9.10-2.fc17.i686 !=
> >> libvirt-client-0.9.10-3.fc17.x86_64
>
> >> What does the error mean?
> > ...
>
> Or, some packager forgot to use
Today when using F17 Alpha, I ran qemu and got an error which was
something like:
qemu-kvm: undefined symbol usbredirhost_foo
(I don't recall the precise symbol). This was just because that
version of qemu was compiled against a later version of
libusbredirhost.so (but one with the same soname
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Today when using F17 Alpha, I ran qemu and got an error which was
> something like:
>
> qemu-kvm: undefined symbol usbredirhost_foo
>
> (I don't recall the precise symbol). This was just because that
> version of qemu was compiled again
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #9 from Erik M Jacobs 2012-04-05 14:18:31 EDT
---
Looks like it works.
[root@atlas ~]$ cat amavisd-miro.te
module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810243
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 20:21 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Today when using F17 Alpha, I ran qemu and got an error which was
> > something like:
> >
> > qemu-kvm: undefined symbol usbredirhost_foo
> >
> > (I don't recall the precise symbol).
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:54:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is there any information about when this should be used? I don't
> think I've ever written a spec file that uses it.
I think it is whenever a package containing a library (i.e. a multilib
package) is required via the package's
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Today when using F17 Alpha, I ran qemu and got an error which was
> > something like:
> >
> > qemu-kvm: undefined symbol usbredirhost_foo
> >
> > (I don't recall the precise sy
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 06:32:47AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>> >> # yum install /usr/sbin/libvirtd
>>
>> >> Error: Protected multilib versions: libvirt-client-0.9.10-2.fc17.i686 !=
>> >> libvirt-client-0.9.10-3.fc17.x86_64
>>
>> >> What
> Is there any information about when this [%{?_isa}] should be used? I don't
> think I've ever written a spec file that uses it.
*EACH* dependency (*EVERY SINGLE ONE*) should use %{_isa}
unless you are in .noarch land, or unless you will be happy
with any compatible architecture [and this is unl
nonamedotc gmail.com> writes:
> Could someone please tell me why the install DVD for F17 is smaller than
> that for earlier releases. The install DVD is 2.3 GB whereas the one for
> F16, for example, is 3.5 GB. Thanks.
AFAIK no one has completely figured this out yet. I noticed that the
libreo
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 13:44 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 12:10 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 10:52 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > So, at least on my F17 machine, gcc looks like this:
> > >
> > > black-lotus:~% rpm -q --requires gcc | grep gomp
> > > l
At the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta by an additional
week[1]. Minutes follow below.
Though the QA team was able to get through all validation testing, it
was found that preupgrade was not functioning at an acceptable level,
thus becoming an additional blocker which prevents
# F17 Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-04-06
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Since F17 beta has officially slipped again, we're having another beta
blocker bug review meeting!
The fifth and final (hopefully for real this
John Reiser wrote:
> Or, some packager forgot to use %{?_isa} when specifying package
> dependencies which are [or become] architecture-dependent. This is a
> common and systematic error which causes much grief. None of the tools
> check for it, which is another bug^W"opportunity for enhancement"
Kalev Lember wrote:
> It's very understandable why rpm allows this. But yum's depsolver on the
> other hand should be tailored to the way Fedora repos are set up and, in
> my opinion, not install compat arch packages when it can solve the deps
> with the primary arch packages.
The point is that it
James Antill wrote:
> Not really, I think the problem is that you installed with F17 and are
> now on rawhide, but rawhide has older versions of a bunch of packages.
… which is a blatant violation of upgrade path rules and should be filed as
urgent bugs against the affected packages. We have the
66 matches
Mail list logo
