On 03/23/2012 12:22 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have darkserver [1] in production. The URL is [2].
>
> This service is providing the API(s) based on which other developers
> can write tools to query details of build-ids. I am also writing a
> command line client for the same, which wil
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 12:22 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Darkserver
>> [2] https://darkserver.fedoraproject.org/
>
> Congrats Kushal. You should cross reference 1 and 2 and maybe make 2
> not look like something peel
On 03/23/2012 12:41 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 03/23/2012 12:22 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
>>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Darkserver
>>> [2] https://darkserver.fedoraproject.org/
>>
>> Congrats Kushal. You should cross reference 1 and
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 10:12 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 10:40 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > just a little follow-up. I came across similar question with other user
> > and even not for him, but for me, in my F17 install, I get an empty
> > string when issuing:
Since there is only one currently proposed blocker and F17 beta RC1
should land sometime Friday, there isn't much point in having a blocker
meeting.
Instead, please test beta RC1 once it lands. There are a lot of
accepted blocker bugs - the fixes for them will need testing and
verification.
So, o
2012/3/23 Kevin Kofler :
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> I tried to build mod_spdy and I hit this
>> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 460:
>> elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0x)
>> == 8' failed!
>>
>> I get this when I try to build even
On Mar 22, 2012 8:32 PM, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> I would still like you to consider the question of whether this holds
>> for the Fedora case, though. Is Fedora as a project in fact suitable -
>> either in current implementation, or in terms of our self-defini
On Mar 22, 2012 8:47 PM, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't seem like a huge over-reach to assume that any RH interest in
>> ARM is more on the server side than a raging desire to take on Android
>> and the iPad:) (Note: I don't have any sekrit inside info on
On Mar 23, 2012 3:22 AM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, drago01 wrote:
> >> The only ones where this is possible right now are actually x86 based
> >> tablets. Even Windows 8 wont help here as MS mandates that the
> >> devices are locked wit
- Original Message -
> Define "do it " as MeeGo is dead and they had to cosy up to Microsoft
> to survive, not sure I'd even wish that on canonical!
In reality, Nokia never started working on MeeGo ;-)
Once we're sooo off-topic (and tablets and cell phones) became the topic,
I think ARM
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:48:11PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
> Hi all,
> looks like PyXML package is deprecated since python itself provides
> xml mechanisms.
> When you look deeper,
> python's xml provides:
> "dom", "parsers", "sax", "etree"
> and PyXML provides:
> 'dom', 'marshal', 'parsers', 'sa
Le Jeu 22 mars 2012 21:13, Przemek Klosowski a écrit :
> Fair enough, but the trends are well established,
Like the netbook trends were well established?
In the last years there has been a clear struggle between users that want
cheaper computing and hardware manufacturers that want either to up
Compose started at Fri Mar 23 08:15:06 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.42 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806292
Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.42 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-1.352 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806296
Summary: perl-POE-1.352 is available
Product: Fedora
Versio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.26 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806286
Summary: perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.26 is available
Product
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
--
Regards,
Heiko Adams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> Hi,
> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
> --
> Regards,
>
> Heiko Adams
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedorapr
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heiko Adams
>> --
>> devel mail
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heiko Adams
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>>> --
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse:
86c988672dd3f5b80c4b54f6caffcfb9 Module-ExtractUse-0.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 03/22/2012 10:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Fair enough, but the trends are well established, and the data are
for shipments so the actual deployed numbers are compounded (flat
shipments translate to steady growth, linear or faster shipment
growth means quadratic or ma
On 03/23/2012 05:59 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
And yes smartphones are booming, but they're not booming because they
are a good desktop substitute, they're booming because they are a
good dumbphone substitute (and before that digital cameras replaced
chemical cameras, and mp3 readers replaced wa
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 19:41 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> because I have read, that grub2 should be able to boot from LVM. I have
> done the
> following test in a VM
>
> 1.) Fresh install of Fedora 16. Unfortunately, I can't create a disk
> which contains olny
> a volume group, so I h
commit bd9b14e1ab13a1cc9c3950bbab82294aa7ad0521
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Mar 23 15:16:56 2012 +
Update to 0.27
- New upstream release 0.27
- Removed Test::NoWarnings from a t/23_universal_require.t because it
upsets
the (manual) plan if the tests are skippe
> always with the caveat that you can't just use "make -j 288" on them.
Why not? Multi-CPU machines is very old technology.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
David Lehman wrote:
I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was on
screen on tty6)
Does the anaconda option "nogpt" no longer exist
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 10:19 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> David Lehman wrote:
> > I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
> > had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
> > mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning
Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
> David Lehman wrote:
>> I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
>> had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
>> mklabel command on tty2 while the anaconda prerelease warning was on
>> sc
Hi folks
I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is
mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat
risky...
What do you think? Correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks in advance
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blo
On 3/20/12 1:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 23:52 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> It's not an option with Fedora-17-Beta-TC2-x86_64-DVD.iso. I don't see
>> anything listed in alpha, beta, or final release criteria that
>> requires it, but it's been a past option. Summary is tha
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/319
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/319/0001-Ticket-319-ldap-agent-crashes-on-start-with-signal-S.patch
The crash happens if you have two or more servers in the ldap-agent.conf
file. We were not resetting the buffer length between files.
Tha
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.27-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
bd9b14e... Update to 0.27
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per
Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is
mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat
risky...
What exactly are you talking about? Could you provide the URL you found?
Michal
--
devel mailing list
de
On 03/23/2012 11:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
>
>> David Lehman wrote:
>>
>>> I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
>>> had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
>>> mklabel co
2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt :
> Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
>
>> I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is
>> mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat
>> risky...
>
>
> What exactly are you talking about? Could you provide the URL y
Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release
available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable
is 3.2.12
That does not mean that 3.3 is somehow unstable. It is supposed to be
generally usable and not dangerous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806286
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
>>> wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>>
I mirror this locally from a mirror and now seeing most of the sub
dir's, such as image, efi, etc.. are now missing. (Checked other mirrors
too).
Someone threw a grenade on the F17 tree and wiped it out? haha
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little town on Earth!"
--
devel mailing list
httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next
week. Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd
modules. There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need
patches if upstream has not done that work already:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/de
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next
> week. Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd
> modules. There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need
> patches if upstream has not done
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:48:51 -0500
Mike Chambers wrote:
> I mirror this locally from a mirror and now seeing most of the sub
> dir's, such as image, efi, etc.. are now missing. (Checked other
> mirrors too).
>
> Someone threw a grenade on the F17 tree and wiped it out? haha
>
There were no ins
Hi,
2012/3/23 Joe Orton :
> httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next
> week. Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd
> modules. There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need
> patches if upstream has not done that work already:
>
>
Am 23.03.2012 17:23, schrieb Sergio Belkin:
> 2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt :
>> Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
>>
>>> I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is
>>> mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat
>>> risky...
>>
>>
>> What ex
Broken upgrade path report for tags dist-f15-updates -> f16-updates -> f17 ->
f18:
GConf2:
f17 > f18 (GConf2-3.2.5-1.fc17 GConf2-3.2.4-1.fc18)
Pound:
dist-f15-updates > f16-updates (Pound-2.6-1.fc15 Pound-2.6-0.5.fc16)
PyMca:
dist-f15-updates > f17 (PyMca-4.4.1-4.p1.fc15 PyMca-4.4.1-
It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the following:
FAIL] f18
Latest package: Field3D-1.3.2-1.fc18
Latest pending package: None
Error: Tested package must be less than or equal to the latest
(pending) package.
How did a .fc18 package end up in F1
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels
I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically,
if it came from linux-stable.git and doesn't have an -rc in the tag,
it's a stable kernel release.
https://git.kernel.org/?p=li
On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the following:
FAIL] f18
Latest package: Field3D-1.3.2-1.fc18
Latest pending package: None
Error: Tested package must be less than or equal to the latest
(pending)
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the
>> following:
>>
>> FAIL] f18
>> Latest package: Field3D-1.3.2-1.fc18
>> Latest pending package: None
>>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/23/2012 11:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>> It passed for -testing but after submitting for stable[1] I got the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> FAIL] f18
>>> Latest package: Fie
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can
>> ignore the error though? Or does it need to be fixed?
>
> Fix. :(
Which means I really need to bump the release in
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>> Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can
>>> ignore the error though? Or does it need to be fixed?
>>
Hey, everyone. I'm sorry this is late, my bad for not getting it up
earlier. :(
The Retrospective page for Fedora 17 QA is now up:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_QA_Retrospective
We use the retrospective page to track things that went well and things
that didn't go so well during the F
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:46:23 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> My desktop is actually older and slower than my notebook. Yet I use the
> desktop whenever I'm at home. The form factor is just more convenient.
That's just what you personally prefer. I quit using desktops back
in 2001, because laptop fo
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:01:27 -0400
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5141 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing instr
> Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The
trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half
the power.
http://trimslice.com/web/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio B
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
> > Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release
> > available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable
> > is 3.2.12
>
> That does not mean that 3.3 is so
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
>
> This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
> Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
Whatever floats your boat! ARM SoCs are available in every
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> 08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>
> 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>
> 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 04:50:38PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> >> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
> >
> > This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
> > Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, lik
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:01:27 -0400
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
>
> This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
> Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17
techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17
autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build
overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:02:37 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > It unfortunately shed no light on the ARM topic, because, well,
> > there's ARM SoCs in all those form factors.
>
> Except the x86-64 high performance single threaded class :-)
Rich, check this out -
http://summit.openstack.org
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:05:39 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Trimslice has options of SSD or HDD as well so it would be no less of
> a real machine like a netwinder.
>
> http://trimslice.com/web/models
So I see, thanks. DJ's original suggestion was too forceful in insisting
on iSCSI. I also recei
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:05:39 +
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Trimslice has options of SSD or HDD as well so it would be no less of
>> a real machine like a netwinder.
>>
>> http://trimslice.com/web/models
>
> So I see, thanks. DJ's origin
> So I see, thanks. DJ's original suggestion was too forceful in insisting
> on iSCSI.
Sorry, I'm a big fan of iSCSI on trimslices. The SATA interface is on
USB but the gigE isn't, so network (iscsi) is about 3x faster than a
local disk, if you have a big raid server on the other end.
I have tw
DJ Delorie wrote:
Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
You did see that there's a "Trimslice H" model that can accomodate a
2.5"
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> Of course, but numbers are numbers; we just have to pay attention to
> lighter, mobile formfactors. It is the same reasoning as in the desktop
> vs. server dilemma 15 years ago: you could say that 'servers are
> per-company devices', so Linux has been concentrating on the
2012/3/23 Adam Williamson :
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
>> > Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release
>> > available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64 and stable
>> > is 3.2.12
>>
>
DJ Delorie wrote:
>> always with the caveat that you can't just use "make -j 288" on them.
>
> Why not? Multi-CPU machines is very old technology.
Ask the people who designed those machines.
(My guess: memory and bus bandwidth. There's a limit to how many cores you
can put on a shared-memory,
DJ Delorie wrote:
> So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The
> trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half
> the power.
>
> http://trimslice.com/web/
"Trim-Slice is the first desktop computer powered by NVIDIA Tegra 2."
i.e., by buying a Trimslice, y
> i.e., by buying a Trimslice, you give money to The Enemy!
What a horrible thing to say about a company that's put a lot of
effort into supporting their products on Free Software platforms!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
On 23 March 2012 18:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>> So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The
>> trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half
>> the power.
>>
>> http://trimslice.com/web/
>
> "Trim-Slice is the first desktop computer powe
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>> So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The
>> trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half
>> the power.
>>
>> http://trimslice.com/web/
>
> "Trim-Slice is the first desktop com
Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev:
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels
>
> I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically,
> if it came from linux-stable.git and doesn't have an -rc in the tag,
Am 24.03.2012 01:18, schrieb Sergio Belkin:
> 2012/3/23 Adam Williamson :
>> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release
available of kernel for f16 is kernel-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 17:50:22 GMT, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Broken upgrade path report for tags dist-f15-updates -> f16-updates -> f17 ->
> f18:
I like this. Though webkitgtk3 is missing from the list (1.7.91 in f17,
1.7.5 in f18).
DJ Delorie wrote:
> What a horrible thing to say about a company that's put a lot of
> effort into supporting their products on Free Software platforms!
I think the Nouveau developers have a different story to tell you there.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
2012/3/23 Reindl Harald :
>
> Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev:
>> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically,
>> if it came from linux-stable.git an
84 matches
Mail list logo
