Re: What are the rules for updating a package?

2012-03-15 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/14/2012 07:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix > release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.) > > In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I a

Orphaning json due to legal issues in newer versions.

2012-03-15 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
According to repoquery nothing depends on this package anymore so I orphaned it in rawhide. If noone takes it I'll deprecate and remove it in beginnning of April. Alex - Original Message - > From: "Tom Callaway" > To: json-ow...@fedoraproject.org, scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org >

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-15 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 03/13/2012 02:17 PM, James Antill wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 18:20 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: 'Course we could go further and rename /etc/httpd -> /etc/apache (and rename the package, both matching Debian), which should have been done a long time ago. It used to be like that: htt

Re: Hi I'm Anthony Sasadeusz and I want to help package

2012-03-15 Thread Praveen Kumar
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Anthony Sasadeusz wrote: > Hi, I want to try to get involved with the open source community. I am a > junior at University of Maryland Baltimore County studying Computer > Engineering. My goal is to eventually help out with the JBOSS packaging for > Googles summer

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-15 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:44:53AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 03/13/2012 02:17 PM, James Antill wrote: > >On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 18:20 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>'Course we could go further and rename /etc/httpd -> /etc/apache (and > >>rename the package, both matching Deb

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-15 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2012-03-14, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: >> * Dan Williams >> >> > 0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either >> > success or failure) before saying the machine is connected. Thus if >> > IPv4 completes first, NM will

[Bug 803003] perl-Tk-Pod-0.9940 is available

2012-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803003 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

F-17 Branched report: 20120315 changes

2012-03-15 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Mar 15 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

File Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.120740.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2012-03-15 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu: 063695efb3b3a84f09f4c31a13cdae94 Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu-1.120740.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin

Re: What are the rules for updating a package?

2012-03-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
2012/3/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : > On 03/14/2012 07:51 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY >>  wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >  Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a >>> > bugfix >>> >  release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven'

FUDCon Kuala Lumpur travel subsidy requests are now open

2012-03-15 Thread Robyn Bergeron
Greetings, As you may know, there is a planned APAC FUDCon in Kuala Lumpur coming up soon, May 18-20 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:KualaLumpur_2012 If you are planning to attend FUDCon Kuala Lumpur and need a travel subsidy, the ticketing system is currentl

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:47 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 13:36:06 Dan Williams wrote: > > Whether we care enough about this regression (if you want to call it > > that) versus enabling default IPv6 connectivity I don't know, I tend to > > think we suck up the regression. >

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 10:07 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-03-14, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: > >> * Dan Williams > >> > >> > 0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either > >> > success or failure) before saying the m

Re: Hi I'm Anthony Sasadeusz and I want to help package

2012-03-15 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 16:41 -0700, Anthony Sasadeusz wrote: > Hi, I want to try to get involved with the open source community. I am > a junior at University of Maryland Baltimore County studying Computer > Engineering. My goal is to eventually help out with the JBOSS > packaging for Googles summer

[389-devel] Please review: coverity 12606 Logically dead code

2012-03-15 Thread Noriko Hosoi
The previous fix (commit 325abca7135d06225adf5380d726de60dacda5a4) for "Ticket #303 - make DNA range requests work with transactions" introduced this dead code. Since dna_pre_op does not allocate an entry "e", there is no need to check the flag "free_entry" and free it. >From 4e0c70fd1a52d4bc943613

Re: [389-devel] Please review: coverity 12606 Logically dead code

2012-03-15 Thread Mark Reynolds
ack On 03/15/2012 12:22 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > The previous fix (commit 325abca7135d06225adf5380d726de60dacda5a4) > for "Ticket #303 - make DNA range requests work with transactions" > introduced this dead code. Since dna_pre_op does not allocate > an entry "e", there is no need to check the fl

[Test-Announce] 2012-03-16 @ 17:00 UTC - F17 Beta Blocker Bug Review #3

2012-03-15 Thread Tim Flink
# F17 Beta Blocker Review meeting #3 # Date: 2012-03-16 # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT - note the DST change) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net I'm sure that everyone is struggling to hold back their excitement but worry not - the next blocker bug review meeting is al

This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-15 Thread John Ellson
Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for me" is a real pain. John -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 802986] perl-Debug-Client-0.18 is available

2012-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802986 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-15 12:51:23 EDT --- Term::ReadLine::Perl >= 1.0303 is needed for tests. -- Configure bu

[Bug 802986] perl-Debug-Client-0.18 is available

2012-03-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802986 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson wrote: > Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please?  Having to > find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for me" is a real > pain. Typically the link to the Bodhi update is provided in the BZ. I imagine tighter

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 12:04 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Ellson wrote: > > Can we just generate "karma" from a comment in bugzilla please? Having to > > find some other weird place to indicate that a fix "works for me" is a real > > pain. > > Typically the li

Re: This "karma" stuff is a pain!

2012-03-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > Luke Macken does Bodhi. It certainly sounds non-trivial to me, for a > start, Bodhi uses FAS and Bugzilla does not. It would be trivial if these decisions would be made by a human who is CCed on both (i.e. the maintainer of the package) rather than by software. K

Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Fedorans, we are facing a very strange Python segfault in an OLPC build, based on F14, for XO-1.5 (I know, do you remember _that_ far ago?). The state of the OS and disk is well known, but we cannot make it happen at will. So I got my hands on a coredump, installed the exact same OS (so exact

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-15 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:18:16 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > we are facing a very strange Python segfault in an OLPC build, based > on F14, for XO-1.5 (I know, do you remember _that_ far ago?). [...] > Full error msg from gdb at http://fpaste.org/YqGv/ All those GDB messages mean your system libra

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > All those GDB messages mean your system libraries do not match the core file. Well, that should just not be. The machine that fails, and my machine have both been installed from the same disk image, which gets written to disk with a process

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-15 Thread John Reiser
On 03/15/2012 01:58 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:18:16 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> we are facing a very strange Python segfault in an OLPC build, based >> on F14, for XO-1.5 (I know, do you remember _that_ far ago?). > [...] >> Full error msg from gdb at http://fpaste.org

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-15 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi John, thanks for the reply - looping back devel@lfo and devel@llo... On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:14 PM, John Gilmore wrote: > Irreproducible bugs are a real pain. Indeed -- > Try typing "info files" to gdb and see what sections it sees in the > core file and in the executable. I can't make m

F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Gerry Reno
Ok, I don't know what list you want this F17-alpha stuff on but here goes... I downloaded the F17 alpha DVD and installed it on one of my laptops today. I selected Use All Space and Encrypted. At repos I selected Installation Repo and Fedora-i386. Install completed just fine. Boot loader insta

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > > Can someone point out what is needed here or do I just file bug reports? I'd suggest installing something more recent, like F17 Beta TC1. http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/17-Beta.TC1/ Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.f

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Gerry Reno
Ok, I'll give that a try. Thanks. On 03/15/2012 07:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> Can someone point out what is needed here or do I just file bug reports? >> > I'd suggest installing something more recent, like F17 Beta TC1. > http://dl.

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > Ok, I'll give that a try. > > Thanks. I suggest netinst.iso or livecd, and enable all the repos in anaconda, so that your installation is current from the first boot. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

2012-03-15 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote: The current connectivity checking code is built-but-inactive in F17, you can enable it by adding these entries to /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: [connectivity] uri=http:// interval=120 the URL is expected to return one or both of: 1) an HTTP

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:45 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > > > Ok, I'll give that a try. > > > > Thanks. > > I suggest netinst.iso or livecd, and enable all the repos in anaconda, > so that your installation is current from the first boot. And if y

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Gerry Reno
Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem. Graphics is Geforce FX 5600 On 03/15/2012 09:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:45 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: >> >> >>> Ok, I'll give that a tr

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem. > > Graphics is Geforce FX 5600 Ah. Then that'll be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745202 . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter

Re: F17-alpha: UI unusable

2012-03-15 Thread Gerry Reno
On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem. >> >> Graphics is Geforce FX 5600 >> > Ah. Then that'll be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745202 . >

Re: Debuginfo package for Python-2.7 on F14 mismatched or (l)user error?

2012-03-15 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:31:58 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Well, that should just not be. The machine that fails, and my machine > have both been installed from the same disk image, which gets written > to disk with a process equivalent to dd. > > And both machines pass rpm -Va just fine. So the