On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> Brian C. Lane wrote:
>>> I am going to be leaving parted at 3.0 for F17, I don't want to
>>> introduce a large change at this stage.
>>
>> This is really unhelpful, it's going to leave frontends with no way to
>> readd support f
On 03/13/2012 07:04 AM, Xibo Ning wrote:
Hi,
Do we really need a fineness c program to make symbol link? In
redhat-lsb.spec, we can see:
%triggerpostun -- glibc
if [ -x /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu} ]; then
/usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu}
fi
And in redhat_lsb_trigge
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:08:32AM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 07:04 AM, Xibo Ning wrote:
> The best solution would probably be to replace the %triggerpostun
> with a lua scriptlet, something like this (totally untested and
> you'll need to add the LSB-version somewhere too):
>
> %t
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:50:06PM -0400, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to the Fedora project although I've been a long-time Fedora user. I'm
> hoping someone can review and sponsor a package that I've had in the pipe for
> a while, and am only getting back to dealing with:
>
> ht
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed recently a worrying git behavior. I often do something like that:
> git fsck --full
> git gc
> git push origin master | backup of the entire tree in tar archive
>
> 'git fsck' or 'git gc' sometimes causes damage to the repository ie:
>
> $ git fsck --
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXML:
07c9ac47e0456b812e1e3ed1f4d4cb34 XML-LibXML-1.95.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
commit 8c221fa865295ffa7a5e98b43b83f123ba0062bd
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Wed Mar 14 11:43:47 2012 +0100
1.95 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803004
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
2012/3/14 Nikola Pajkovsky :
> Michał Piotrowski writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed recently a worrying git behavior. I often do something like that:
>> git fsck --full
>> git gc
>> git push origin master | backup of the entire tree in tar archive
>>
>> 'git fsck' or 'git gc' sometimes causes damage
Hello, I'm Martin Werner, otherwise active in the Debian Games Team[0]
doing packaging work, and in the Red Eclipse[1] game community working
with documentation, licensing, testing, etc.
I'm in the process of Packaging Red Eclipse for Fedora[2], I've gone
through most of the review process (I hope
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:08:32AM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On 03/13/2012 07:04 AM, Xibo Ning wrote:
>> The best solution would probably be to replace the %triggerpostun
>> with a lua scriptlet, something like this (totally untested and
Niels de Vos (de...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> >> %triggerpostun -p -- glibc
> >> LDSO = "/usr/lib/ld.so"
> >> LSBLDSO = "/usr/lib/ld." + LSB_VERSION + ".so"
> >> %ifarch ia64
> >> LDSO = "/emul/ia32-linux/lib" + LSBLDSO
> >> %fi
> >> posix.symlink(LDSO, LSBLDSO)
> >
> > That is not equivalent.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803003
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802990
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-Resolver:
ba104cbb998802f789e237f0ac1b8ef7 POE-Component-Resolver-0.916.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
commit 4b50260e42e0f233f92dfe89cb91d0ff15a59f3a
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Wed Mar 14 18:17:53 2012 +0100
0.916 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-Resolver.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 del
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802985
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Dan Williams
>
> > 0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
> > success or failure) before saying the machine is connected. Thus if
> > IPv4 completes first, NM will say it's connected, and continue IPv6 in
>
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 13:36:06 Dan Williams wrote:
> Whether we care enough about this regression (if you want to call it
> that) versus enabling default IPv6 connectivity I don't know, I tend to
> think we suck up the regression.
Please do. The current behaviour of tearing down working IPv6
Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.)
In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to 3.2.6?
In f17alpha we also have 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update that at this
point
On 03/15/2012 01:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
> release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive
> check.)
>
> In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to 3.2.6?
>
> In f17alpha
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> Red Hat (nee Gluster) is about to release glusterfs-3.2.6. It's a bugfix
> release. No API/ABI changes (in theory, I haven't done an exhaustive check.)
>
> In f16 we released 3.2.5. Am I allowed to update it in f16 to 3.2.6?
>
> In f17a
On 03/02/2012 11:31 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Tom Callaway
On 03/02/2012 04:39 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
This one *most likely* works (it assumes /sbin/dhclient in Fedora will
*always* use a link-local source address when building a DHCPv6 request.
I believe that is the case, but I have not re
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:45 +1030, Glen Turner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the network engineer at Australia's Academic and Research Network
> responsible for assisting the deployment of IPv6 across Australian
> universities. Your posting was bought to my attention.
>
> Your phrasing of the condition f
Hi, I want to try to get involved with the open source community. I am a
junior at University of Maryland Baltimore County studying Computer
Engineering. My goal is to eventually help out with the JBOSS packaging for
Googles summer of code and continue to help out the community. I have good
linux s
25 matches
Mail list logo
