On 06/03/12 16:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> yeah, this sort of thing comes up sadly.
>
> I think in the EPEL world the conclusion we came to was:
>
> - Create a parallel installable 1.4 version, submit for review and
> get added to the collection.
>
> - Continue to maintain the 1.2 version as lon
On 03/06/2012 11:49 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze:
Hi,
libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname
was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's
incompatible with older snapshots they have produce
Can't we just get the policy right so that users can add queues?
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Richard, I'll add some more context.
The package I'm preparing is for rdkit (http://rdkit.org), a
cheminformatic software with several components (a library, python
bindings, and Postgres chemical cartridge).
The current files I'm working on are here:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
On 07/03/12 10:22, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
I am not sure this is going to work (at least in the present case):
the package includes some SQL code along with a shared object that
pgsql server runs to provide the chemical functions. AFAICT setting
this up is completely server side (see
http://code.
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 11:27 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> >> Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be
> >> honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user
> >> POV.
> >>
> > Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> It might be worth looking at how something like the postgis package handles
> this, as it also contains a Postgres extension.
Yeah. useful:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=postgis.git;a=blob;f=postgis.spec;h=53c558366da23ea5afdec41331b3
On 07/03/12 10:45, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
It might be worth looking at how something like the postgis package handles
this, as it also contains a Postgres extension.
Yeah. useful:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=postgis.git;a=blob;f=
I tried the i686 DVD (haven't tried the live cd yet), On install I got a
text installer that installed a minimal system (191 packages - no options).
It did boot, but after installing KDE and X via yum, startx failed.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Try i686 iso, the x
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:37 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:35:11PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> passwd keeps complaining "The password fails the dictionary check -
>>> it is too simplistic" for fake words NOT in the dic
We're a bit late to our own party this year but rpm 4.10 pre-release
version should be headed for rawhide in not too far future. In the
meanwhile, in what is starting to become a tradition at this point,
Fedora compatible [*] SRPM(s) are available at
http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/ for brav
Well, what you need to build against is Postgres 9.1.x, because that is
what is in current Fedora releases. I think you should just do -DPG91
and be done with it. You could BuildRequire postgresql-devel >= 9.1.0
if that makes you feel better.
regards, tom lane
--
devel m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768846
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hello,
I have orphaned foobillard: I don't have any time to fix reported
bugs, there hasn't been a release since 2008, and the upstream site
has been missing for at least 9 months. If you are interested, please
take it.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
commit dec5cbf54285101b817329f03a9a71056b7cf27f
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Mar 7 15:02:25 2012 +
Clean up and add EL-5 support
- Add test suite patch to support building with Test::More < 0.88 so that we
can build for EPEL-5, only applying the patch when necessary
2012/3/7 Miloslav Trmač :
> Hello,
> I have orphaned foobillard: I don't have any time to fix reported
> bugs, there hasn't been a release since 2008, and the upstream site
> has been missing for at least 9 months. If you are interested, please
> take it.
> Mirek
Taken. I love that game. I h
The lightweight tag 'perl-Software-License-0.103004-2.fc18' was created
pointing to:
dec5cbf... Clean up and add EL-5 support
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Summary of changes:
dec5cbf... Clean up and add EL-5 support (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
Hi,
I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is
happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future.
1. Packaging guidelines updates
- I'd like to add guidelines for packaging compat libraries. Maven
already has support for this (see [1]) so I'd like
Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is
> happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future.
>
> 1. Packaging guidelines updates
> - I'd like to add guidelines for packaging compat libraries. Mave
On 03/07/2012 08:53 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is
happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future.
1. Packaging guidelines updates
- Update JNI part of the guidelines to reflect current practice. T
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781409
Bug 781409 depends on bug 783125, which changed state.
Bug 783125 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Dynamic - Non-static
Quoting Orion Poplawski (2012-03-07 17:48:37)
>On 03/07/2012 08:53 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is
>> happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future.
>>
>> 1. Packaging guidelines updates
>>
>>
commit 42502e4ac166060822dde84182cdc5cc7370da53
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Jan 19 13:32:03 2012 +0100
1.008 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Task-Perl-Critic.spec | 23 +++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 del
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:36:23PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> >> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
> >> not had a successful build in F-15 or later)
> >
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:36:23PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (i
I'm orphaning mingw-portablexdr since I have nothing to do with this
package and lack the time to maintain it.
Ryan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/292
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/292/0001-Ticket-292-logconv.pl-reporting-unindexed-search-wit.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/07/2012 12:22 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
I'm orphaning mingw-portablexdr since I have nothing to do with this
package and lack the time to maintain it.
Ryan
Disregard this. I thought I was the owner since this package was listed
under "My packages" in fedora and I was receiving email about
W dniu 07.03.2012 10:13, Xavier Bachelot pisze:
> On 03/06/2012 11:49 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname
>>> was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to m
On 03/05/2012 07:13 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> Yes, it's a policy.
>>
>> Also see this bug which I filed nearly two years ago on just this
>> subject:
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711
>>
>> Tim.
>> */
>>
>
> New bug report filed: "se
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed,
> > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
> > it really does not build, I expect a bug report.
>
> There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed,
>> > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
>> > it really does not build, I expect a bug
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> If there aren't FTBFS bug reports in the future, that's going to make
>> doing FTBFS-blocking tricky. Did you generate your list merely from
>> "things with older dist tags, so they obviously didn't rebuild", or fr
Hello everybody,
My name is Ozan Caglayan and I'm from Istanbul/Turkey, age 26.
I was one of the core developers of the Pardus Linux distribution funded
and developed by the Turkish government. I became a part of the project in
2007 and worked as a paid developer until January 2012.
I became the
On 03/07/2012 10:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Orion Poplawski (2012-03-07 17:48:37)
On 03/07/2012 08:53 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is
happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future.
1.
On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alex
On Mar 7, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
> UNIX didn't have these defaults originally; they were added in the
> 90's only after real-world experience has shown that these policies
> are necessary (and they have been pretty much unchanged for the last
> 10-15 years, AFAIK).
It's a ph
If your stuff depends on IO, you should give XFS a try :)
2012/3/2 Richard Shaw :
> 2012/3/2 Michał Piotrowski :
>> More frightening benchmarks are shown here
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FegjLbCnoBw
>
> That was a pretty cool video. Makes me want to try XFS again.
>
> Richard
> --
> devel ma
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
> If your stuff depends on IO, you should give XFS a try :)
Assuming you are not talking about a desktop system just buy a ssd and
never worry about I/O every again.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:30 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
>> If your stuff depends on IO, you should give XFS a try :)
>
> Assuming you are not talking about a desktop system just buy a ssd and
> never worry about I/O every again.
Err.. that should
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 06:19:39PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt stopped doing them due
> to lack of time, the maintainer would have got failed builds for the
> mass rebuild and should have investigated as part of "maintaining" the
> package.
Is thi
On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:31 PM, drago01 wrote:
> "Assuming you are talking about a desktop system just buy a ssd and
> never worry about I/O ever again."
Well, most of my colleagues and customers with desktop systems have rather
extreme storage requirements. Individual files multi gigabyte composite
Chris Murphy wrote:
Well, most of my colleagues and customers with desktop systems have rather
extreme storage requirements. Individual files multi gigabyte composited image
files. So an SSD is nice for speed, but cost prohibitive for everything to be
stored on SSD. What they need is a file sy
Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
My name is Ozan Caglayan and I'm from Istanbul/Turkey, age 26.
Welcome.
[snip]
I was really an integration, patch, bugfix, debugging, backporting,
scripting guy back in Pardus. I'm fairly good at Python. I pretty suck
in GUI design/development. I already prepared some RPM
On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Yes, such a feature was submitted[1], but it has never been committed by
> Chris AFAIK. There is also a OS-agnostic method of this. Seagate XT drives
> use a small SSD as a cache. Then there is also a Windows method with Intel's
> SSD Cac
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Yes, such a feature was submitted[1], but it has never been committed by
>> Chris AFAIK. There is also a OS-agnostic method of this. Seagate XT drives
>> use a small SSD as a cache.
On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:31 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> Yes, such a feature was submitted[1], but it has never been committed by
>>> Chris AFAIK. There is also a OS-agnostic method of th
> I think I'd rather see a portion of the SSD be a discrete device so that the
> system and application scratch/swap can be pointed to it - rather than as
> cache. I'm not sure that this data would always stay hot enough to be assured
> of being in an SSD cache, whereas a discretely defined devi
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:31 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Chris Murphy
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Yes, such a feature was submitted[1], but it has never been commi
Hi,
I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora.
I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
review , or is already reviewed .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799651
Th
On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
> It will come to a complete crawl which was exactly my point, faster
> storage does not really help you in that situation.
Umm, that would seem to be fundamentally broken. I certainly haven't had this
experience on Mac OS X in cases where it has star
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:51 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Try i686 iso, the x86_64 is broken.
What do you mean by this? I'm not aware of any well-known functional
difference between the two.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedor
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 07:41 -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> I tried the i686 DVD (haven't tried the live cd yet), On install I
> got a text installer that installed a minimal system (191 packages -
> no options). It did boot, but after installing KDE and X via yum,
> startx failed.
From your and
Hi,
I think I'm losing my mind. I recently got stuck with a Dell M6600. Its
a really nice machine but when I installed F17 from the alpha dvd and
updated it over the weekend, graphics was insanely slow (e.g. 1920x1080
screen with just 4 open terminals would take 3 seconds to shift focus
from
Anyone else seeing these:
Mar 7 23:04:26 thinkpad kernel: [ 866.884710] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Queue 2
stuck for 2000 ms.
Mar 7 23:04:26 thinkpad kernel: [ 866.884718] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Current
SW read_ptr 184 write_ptr 187
Mar 7 23:04:26 thinkpad kernel: [ 866.884774] iwlwifi :02
Fabian Deutsch wrote:
because I no longer use them I am orpahning
dbh
muParser
scidavis
I wrote:
I use muParser in Meshlab. I'm not a C++ whiz (as witnessed by my not
yet having figured out how to make Meshlab build properly with GCC
4.7, so I'm waiting for upstream on that), so if anyone w
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:01:48PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> >Well, most of my colleagues and customers with desktop systems have rather
> >extreme storage requirements. Individual files multi gigabyte composited
> >image files. So an SSD is nice for speed, but cos
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:56 -0500, Peter A wrote:
> The issue effects only Evolution it seems - all other software I tried
> works fine (that's anything from firefox to libreoffice to gimp to
> ancient stuff like xv from an rpm built in 99). My desktop is KDE with
> OpenGL rendering but most eff
59 matches
Mail list logo
