Compose started at Sun Feb 26 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
Hello.
ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change
happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
--
With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact
with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
Compose started at Sun Feb 26 08:15:06 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
I'm going to be building Xaw3d 1.6.1 in rawhide shortly. This includes
a soname bump. The following packages are affected:
gv
xdvik
xfig
xvkbd
I will be rebuilding them as well. If all goes well, we may push to
F17 in a couple days.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager
On 22.2.2012 11:21, Roman Rakus wrote:
fedora-business-cards-0:0.2.4.3-2.fc15.noarch
I wonder why this is on the list: if I am not mistaken, it doesn't use
anything else than xml.dom.minidom (in generate.py), which was already
present in python 2.4 (the oldest Python currently living in Fedor
I'm looking for a new package maintainer for flam3, a fractal renderer.
I don't use it anymore and don't quite have the time to maintain it. If
I recall correctly, there's some libpng bug keeping it from building in
rawhide.
If I don't get a volunteer by Wednesday I'm going to go ahead and retire
I was asked to look into this. libglfw is retired, but has dependancies
that need it. It was added to Fedora on Nov 16, and retured by notting
on July 25th, but it does not say why.
Can this package be revived? If needed, I'll take it on. This is
apparently the next generation glut, and used by
I already re-set it to Canada, and it seemed to make no changes, and I
mailed ad...@fedoraproject.org a week or so ago.
What is generating these, and who to contact to fix these?
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:02:08
From: ad...@fedoraproject.org
To: p...
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #799 Issues with maintainer responsivene
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:03:26 -0600,
Ian Weller wrote:
> I'm looking for a new package maintainer for flam3, a fractal renderer.
>
> I don't use it anymore and don't quite have the time to maintain it. If
> I recall correctly, there's some libpng bug keeping it from building in
> rawhide.
>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 21:56:44 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:03:26 -0600,
> Ian Weller wrote:
> > I'm looking for a new package maintainer for flam3, a fractal renderer.
> >
> > I don't use it anymore and don't quite have the time to maintain it. If
> > I recal
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:33:20PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I took a quick look at it and it looks like it's just one for one
> substitutions to use accessor functions instead of references to
> provate data.
>
> I have rawhode and f17 builds going right now.
>
> I don't know how to test t
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 23:10:12 -0600,
Ian Weller wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:33:20PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I took a quick look at it and it looks like it's just one for one
> > substitutions to use accessor functions instead of references to
> > provate data.
> >
> > I hav
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 01:03:32AM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 22.2.2012 11:21, Roman Rakus wrote:
> >fedora-business-cards-0:0.2.4.3-2.fc15.noarch
>
> I wonder why this is on the list: if I am not mistaken, it doesn't
> use anything else than xml.dom.minidom (in generate.py), which was
> alread
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> I also like keeping these from escalating to Tom Lane, who I'd rather
> see working on Postgres.
I appreciate that too ;-) Thanks!
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
Fedora is a feature rich Linux distribution containing the latest advancements
in open source software and I simply love Fedora.
Why does Fedora still decide to use yum? The package management system of
Fedora is still very primitive.
Here are my reasons why yum needs to go or needs *major* chang
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, elison.ni...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Fedora is a feature rich Linux distribution containing the latest advancements
> in open source software and I simply love Fedora.
>
> Why does Fedora still decide to use yum? The package management system of
> Fedora is still very
Kevin Fenzi wrote on 27.02.2012 04:21:
>
> #topic #810 Clarify our position on forks .fesco 810
It's just a statement that is asked for in the ticket, but nevertheless:
Shouldn't issues like this be discussed on this list first, so FESCo
members can get a impression from the flamewar ^w discussio
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-02-27
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's Monday, and you know what that means. It's meeting time, and since
we miraculously managed to ap
19 matches
Mail list logo
