A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tk-Getopt:
3ce04ba565d8ef5acacf03fbd8756486 Tk-Getopt-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
commit 8b73aa8ab919c1424fc6e6edd6895cc807815d87
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Feb 24 09:32:08 2012 +0100
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Tk-Getopt.spec | 94 +++
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 0 d
Hi,
W dniu 20 lutego 2012 19:52 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> 2012/2/20 Dave Jones :
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 16:34 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
>> > napisał:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I've not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796143
Bug 796143 depends on bug 796288, which changed state.
Bug 796288 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Getopt - User configuration w
Hey folks,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787712
I am hitting this bug very frequently on Fedora 16 where python deadlocks.
I tried to apply the patch in this bug to python.src.rpm currently in
Fedora 16, but my local rpmbuild fails with a test error. After disabling
%check rpmbuild
Compose started at Fri Feb 24 08:15:17 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-Compile-0.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797155
Summary: perl-Test-Compile-0.17 is available
Product: Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Compile:
a23529083ab4ba9edeea8fda71eb7512 Test-Compile-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
commit adc71359afd72cad7d1f2a176033f71f7b69250f
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Fri Feb 24 13:06:14 2012 +0100
0.17 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Compile.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797155
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797155
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
2012/2/23 Michal Schmidt :
> On 02/23/2012 03:35 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
>>
>> All services have an [install] section, I just dropped them for this
>> email. Forgot to pull in C.target where? Should D.service contain
>> "After=rc-local.service C.target" then?
>
>
> By "pull in" I mean making it
Quoting Roman Rakus (2012-02-22 11:21:38)
>On 02/22/2012 11:11 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> On 21.2.2012 18:48, Roman Rakus wrote:
>>> So, PyXML duplicates dom, parsers and sax (and looks like python's is in
>>> better shape). Is any package using marshall, schema or any other not in
>>> python itself?
- Original Message -
> Hey folks,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787712
> I am hitting this bug very frequently on Fedora 16 where python
> deadlocks. I tried to apply the patch in this bug to python.src.rpm
> currently in Fedora 16, but my local rpmbuild fails with a test
On 02/24/2012 01:22 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
Hmm... So I fail to see the difference between After and Wants then.
What's the difference between ordering and requirement dependencies?
See this explanation of the orthogonality of ordering and requirement
dependencies by Lennart:
http://lists.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PatchReader needs updating
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797179
Summary: perl-PatchReader needs updating
Product: Fedora
On 02/24/2012 00:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 20:41 -0500, David Quigley wrote:
On 02/23/2012 14:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are
going
> to
> change the place where krb5 credential cache fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2012 08:44 AM, David Quigley wrote:
> On 02/24/2012 00:22, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 20:41 -0500, David Quigley wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2012 14:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
with the upcoming
On 02/24/2012 10:03 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> [coccinella]
> coccinella-0.96.20-3.fc17.noarch requires memchan
I've put memchan up for a new review to revive it and resolve this
broken dep. If anyone would be so kind as to help me out here, I would
appreciate it. :)
https://bugzilla.redha
Hi,
It's been ages since I filed this pacakge review request.
-> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
Could someone please review and approve it?
Thank you.
---
Regards
-Prasad
http://feedmug.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
Revised:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.2.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/
On 02/23/2012 02:35 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [389-devel] please rev
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:32 AM, P J P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been ages since I filed this pacakge review request.
>
> -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
>
>
> Could someone please review and approve it?
Not that it would have made a difference in this case but one problem
- Original Message -
> From: Richard Shaw
> To: P J P ; Development discussions related to Fedora
>
>
> Not that it would have made a difference in this case but one problem
> you have is you've assigned the review request to yourself. It should
> be assigned to the reviewer. Anyone loo
On 2012-02-23 20:06, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Could you help me figure out why path completion with ~/ isn't working
> in fedpkg, but with full paths it is? I assume there is something wrong
> in the (contributed) bash completion file.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedpkg/ticket/3
--
devel mailing l
Hi,
This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building the
libgbm part of Mesa in Fedora?
Having it would make it easier to test Wayland and friends. Any
reasons on why not having it so far?
-Ilyes
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any reasons on why libgb
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/301
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/301/0001-Ticket-301-implement-transaction-support-using-threa.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 2/24/2012 1:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/301
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/301/0001-Ticket-301-implement-transaction-support-using-threa.patch
Nice chunk of code.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:28 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building the
> libgbm part of Mesa in Fedora?
>
> Having it would make it easier to test Wayland and friends. Any
> reasons on why not having it so far?
Thorsten Leemhuis has very graciou
Cool! That's what I want to be part of, too :)
Could these be installed on a Fedora 16?
Thanks,
-Ilyes
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:28 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
>> This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building the
>> libgbm
Another revision
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/
On 02/24/2012 12:31 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Revised:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/00
30 matches
Mail list logo
