-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am
orphaning them.
teseq, mausezahn,samefile.
I have been steadily orpha
On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Keeping packages around with no maintainers or people handling their
bugs is poor for everyone.
Why? If I, as a user, really need a certain piece of software, I'd rather
have an unmaintained package than none at all! Worst case, I
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:28:10 +0100, VS (Vivek) wrote:
>I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am
> orphaning them.
>
> teseq, mausezahn,samefile.
I've taken "samefile".
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
With a little sadless I has to orhan avant-windows-navigator,
awn-extras-applet and libdesktop-agnostic for fedora-devel (fedora-17)
The avant-windows-navigator package don't build in rawhide because of
changes in latest version of vala
The awn-extras-applet has lot of problems with gnome 2.x depe
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-01-16
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again, now we're ramping up towards Alpha, and the
four of us who are at FUDCon wil
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:48:35 +0100,
Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I agree! If a package is orphaned, can't we automatically escalate
> ownership to the next co-maintainer (when there is one - perhaps the
> one with the most commits for example).
>
> If
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:48:35 +0100,
> Brendan Jones wrote:
>> On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I agree! If a package is orphaned, can't we automatically escalate
>> ownership to the next co-maintainer (when there is one
I took teseq.
15.01.2012 14:28, Vivek Shah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am
orphaning them.
t
Bill Nottingham venit, vidit, dixit 13.01.2012 17:11:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 17.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 15.
>
> The following pac
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
None
= New business =
#topic #742 F17 Feat
I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points
that can be optimized in my opinion.
1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in bugzilla,
after some time whit no response from the maintainer I asked in pkgdb
permissions for that package: I'm still wait
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:37:16 +0100, MV (Mattia) wrote:
> I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points
> that can be optimized in my opinion.
>
> 1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in bugzilla,
> after some time whit no response from the maintain
Hello,
About three years ago, I created two very simple packages: mk-files and
bmake. I followed the instructions at that time to get them into the
distribution, and the packages were accepted. For a variety of reasons,
I had not been paying attention to those packages since then, but other
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
> > group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just
> > for "commit" access, but also for someone to monitor bugzilla and
> > t
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:39:48 +0100
Michael J Gruber wrote:
...snip...
(Please trim you emails...)
> Took bibexport.
>
> mathmap seems to be dead upstream as a Gimp plugin, unfortunately.
> (It's supposed to be turned into a web service...)
>
> While it's a pitty to see it go away, pampering t
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:37:16 +0100
Mattia Verga wrote:
> I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points
> that can be optimized in my opinion.
Welcome by the way. ;)
> 1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in
> bugzilla, after some time whit no res
On 01/16/2012 03:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just
for "commit" access, but also for some
Julio Merino wrote:
> Also, I cannot tell if three years ago I gained some privileges that I
> have now lost due to the conversion of the packages repository from cvs
> to git. For example, a "fedpkg clone" without the -a option fails due
> to a permission denied (reason: publickey), although I h
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:08:20 -0500,
Julio Merino wrote:
>
> Also, I cannot tell if three years ago I gained some privileges that
> I have now lost due to the conversion of the packages repository
> from cvs to git. For example, a "fedpkg clone" without the -a
> option fails due to a permis
19 matches
Mail list logo
