Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively" maintained. It's at least how I remember the situat

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively" m

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Ralf Corsepius [11/01/2012 09:59] : > > Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is > subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case. If perl-sig is the maintainer, only provenpackagers will be able to commit. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > >On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >>Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig > >>wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
On 01/11/2012 02:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is h

[perl-Data-Hierarchy] Spec cleanup

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 9df3e25231e178a6489bd881b045030971113da8 Author: Petr Šabata Date: Wed Jan 11 11:03:31 2012 +0100 Spec cleanup perl-Data-Hierarchy.spec | 17 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Data-Hierarchy.spec b/perl-Data-Hierarchy.spec i

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Šabata
Took the followin in Fedora (not EPEL) for now: perl-Algorithm-Annotate perl-Data-Hierarchy perl-File-chdir perl-Time-Progress perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree * rogue tinyfugue -P pgpOPEL64YCmK.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

review of bacula-docs

2012-01-11 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
bacula is already in fedora. why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO

Re: review of bacula-docs

2012-01-11 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/12 11:37, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > bacula is already in fedora. > > why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 > > why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula

Re: f15 koji buildroots broken?

2012-01-11 Thread Nikola Pajkovsky
Ralf Corsepius writes: > Hi, > > I am observing weird build failures for f15: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3638192 > > The corresponding root.log > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3638193&name=root.log) > > tells this: > ,,, > DEBUG backend.py:862: ['/u

[perl-Data-Section-Simple] Created tag perl-Data-Section-Simple-0.03-2.fc17

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Data-Section-Simple-0.03-2.fc17' was created pointing to: 45bc997... Fedora 17 mass rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Tim Niemueller
I took clips and clipsmm, I was the only maintainer and I'm an active developer for clipsmm. Tim -- Tim Niemueller www.niemueller.de = Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) -- devel mai

[Bug 771781] Numerous Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated messages

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771781 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-11 06:39:03 EST --- perl-IPTables-ChainMgr-0.9-9.fc16 has been submitted as an

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-11 Thread Richard
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote: > > Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here: > http://panopticlick.eff.org/ that apparently can be worked around at least partially with noscript but the user agent string is insanely revealing (I do not even use lynx most of the

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Casper
Hello I've taken: * qrencode * dnstracer So co-maintener are welcome too Matthieu -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 pgpRbLYWonwUe.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-11 Thread Emanuel Rietveld
On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote: Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here: http://panopticlick.eff.org/ Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only relevant if your IP is not visible to the web server? Otherwise, you

[perl-Dist-CheckConflicts] Pod::Coverage::TrustPod now available in all supported releases

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 12a40fe2a079318a259b2577abc15ae509807858 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Jan 11 14:36:00 2012 + Pod::Coverage::TrustPod now available in all supported releases perl-Dist-CheckConflicts.spec | 13 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/p

[perl-Digest-MD5-File] Created tag perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-4.fc17

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-MD5-File-0.07-4.fc17' was created pointing to: e9c2de3... BR: perl(Carp) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-d

Re: f15 koji buildroots broken?

2012-01-11 Thread Michael J Gruber
Nikola Pajkovsky venit, vidit, dixit 11.01.2012 12:14: > Ralf Corsepius writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I am observing weird build failures for f15: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3638192 >> >> The corresponding root.log >> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3638193&

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.01.2012 15:21, schrieb Emanuel Rietveld: > On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote: >> >>> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here: >>> http://panopticlick.eff.org/ > > Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only releva

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-11 Thread Genes MailLists
On 01/11/2012 09:21 AM, Emanuel Rietveld wrote: > On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote: >> >>> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here: >>> http://panopticlick.eff.org/ > > Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this only releva

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-11 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03:39AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 01/11/2012 09:21 AM, Emanuel Rietveld wrote: > > On 01/11/2012 12:43 PM, Richard wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:53:52PM +0100, nodata wrote: > >> > >>> Fonts are a bigger threat to privacy, see here: > >>> http://panopt

Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Richard Shaw
Hmm.. Where to start. A recent discussion[1] and package review got me thinking. I'll divide this into two problems/proposals. 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed deprecated. Then we need to update the packaging guidelines for the Desktop Files section[2]. In the "Icon t

qrencode in critical path?

2012-01-11 Thread Paul W. Frields
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/qrencode Is this package supposed to be critical path?[1] It's marked that way for f16 and devel branch, but it was surprising to me. * * * [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_Path_Packages -- Paul W. Frields

Re: f15 koji buildroots broken?

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:45:05 +0100 Michael J Gruber wrote: > Infrastructure ticket anyone? Well, rel-eng. ;) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5023 This issue was due to a nss-util buildroot override expiring. I've re-enabled the override for now, but it would be nice if we could get t

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > The list of orphaned packages is here: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt > I've taken over tetex-IEEEtrans and Jigdo. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproje

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread solarflow99
I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like to take that one if I can. 2012/1/11 Casper : > Hello > I've taken: > > * qrencode > * dnstracer > > So co-maintener are welcome too > > Matthieu > -- > Pour encrypter vos emails > Clef GPG ID : 83288189 > Empreinte : CC26 692

[Fedora-r-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: [Rd] Changed behaviour of 'R CMD INSTALL']

2012-01-11 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi all, Although using the latest version of R from updates-testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0119/ I could however recompile successfully R-zoo (arch specific) and R-widgetTools (noarch) from their latest git version without errors. I think this is worth noting. Good d

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the commit acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora devel) to Approved for ppisar To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing lis

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the approveacls acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora devel) to Approved for ppisar To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailin

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the commit acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora devel) to Approved for psabata To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing li

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the approveacls acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora devel) to Approved for psabata To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel maili

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the commit acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 16) to Approved for ppisar To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list p

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the commit acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 16) to Approved for psabata To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the approveacls acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 16) to Approved for ppisar To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing l

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the approveacls acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 15) to Approved for ppisar To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing l

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the approveacls acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 16) to Approved for psabata To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the approveacls acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 15) to Approved for psabata To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the commit acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 15) to Approved for ppisar To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list p

[pkgdb] perl-Time-Duration had acl change status

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
mmaslano has set the commit acl on perl-Time-Duration (Fedora 15) to Approved for psabata To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Time-Duration -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: qrencode in critical path?

2012-01-11 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 10:32 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/qrencode > > Is this package supposed to be critical path?[1] It's marked that way > for f16 and devel branch, but it was surprising to me. [ajax@f17 ~]$ repoquery --whatrequires qrencode g

Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw wrote: > 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed > deprecated. Then we need to update the packaging guidelines for the > Desktop Files section[2]. In the "Icon tag in Desktop Files" section > it explicitly shows a full path to an icon file in /usr

Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw wrote: >> 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed >> deprecated. Then we need to update the packaging guidelines for the >> Desktop Files section[2]. In the "Icon tag in Desktop Files" section

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, > packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. > comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. Took hfsplus-tools.

File ExtUtils-Manifest-1.60.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-Manifest: 0146485d2f730a3676d0058cd4bbdd02 ExtUtils-Manifest-1.60.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

[perl-ExtUtils-Manifest] Import

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 8d2b64896e7d169476f6813f3f1ee604c987446a Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Jan 11 17:20:33 2012 +0100 Import .gitignore |1 + perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec | 52 +++ sources |1 + 3 files changed, 54 in

[Bug 728487] perl-Shipwright-2.4.30 is available

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728487 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: [pkgdb] gqview ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:06:43 +, FP (Fedora) wrote: > Package gqview in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by jcapik > > To make changes to this package see: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gqview Hi! Doesn't it make more sense to consider Geeqie (package "geeqie") instead? -- d

Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed >>> deprecated. Then we need to update the packaging guidelines for the >>> Desktop Files section[2].

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:26:59AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > People on the list already asked for maintainance of various Perl > group like perl-Moose-*. So, could you go once more over those > packages, which you gave me and orphan them? > Everyone from Perl SIG can take the group of perl

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:44:16AM -0500, solarflow99 wrote: > I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like > to take that one if I can. You can sign up right here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/slim -Toshio pgpn8JWUP2rJh.pgp Description: PGP signatur

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Roland Grunberg
> The list of orphaned packages is here: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I'll be taking over eclipse-oprofile and eclipse-callgraph. -- Roland Grunberg -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw wrote: 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed deprecated. Then we need to update the

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-11 Thread Genes MailLists
On 01/11/2012 10:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03:39AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: >> Odd as it is, IP6 reduces privacy - it was not designed with privacy >> in mind. > > http://ipv6int.net/systems/linux-ipv6.html#privacy > Good point thank you - indeed that h

eclipse-3.7.1-7 upgrade issues

2012-01-11 Thread Roland Grunberg
There was a bit of discussion about the latest release of Fedora Eclipse. A change made recently would cause installed eclipse plug-ins to not show up if Eclipse was upgraded (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760454). Some security issues in tomcat5 along with it being orphaned made it

Re: mock: /usr/sbin/groupadd: Permission denied

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Pavel Lisy wrote: I'm trying make rpm of qmail and I've ended in situation where mock can't create group/users during "mock rebuild". Qmail compilation requires make it under specific user. How can I solve it? Can I force user creation in mock somehow? Look at some other

Orphaning netbeans

2012-01-11 Thread Omair Majid
Hi all, I am the current maintainer of netbeans in fedora. Unfortunately, I have not been able to devote sufficient time to it to keep it in good shape. I am going to orphan it. If you are interested in it, please grab it. I am still the owner of netbeans-platform (which is a a build dependen

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed - php-ZendFramework

2012-01-11 Thread Remi Collet
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > The list of orphaned packages is here: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt php-ZendFramework > have a co-maintainer (heller) I could ownership on it or co-ownership as heller want. Remi.

Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > Nowhere did I suggest that the "Short name without extension" example > should be removed, only that the full pathname example should be > updated to use /usr/share/icon/hicolor over /usr/share/pixmaps. The point is that it makes no sense whatsoever to reference /usr/share/ic

Package categorization and distribution construction

2012-01-11 Thread Bill Nottingham
AKA, taking a blowtorch to the comps file. TL;DR version - come to the talk at FUDCon! I'm here to propose a reworking of how we handle the data in the comps file. (If you don't know what that is, it likely doesn't concern you.) Currently, we have two main use cases for the package groups and li

[pkgdb] perl-Event ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Event in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https

[pkgdb] perl-Event ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Event in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

[pkgdb] perl-Event ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Event in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

[pkgdb] perl-Class-C3-XS ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-C3-XS in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-C3-XS -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje

[pkgdb] perl-Class-C3-XS ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-C3-XS in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-C3-XS -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed > deprecated. It's not installing into /usr/share/pixmaps which is deprecated, but the whole concept of unthemed, fixed-size icons. > Then we need to update the packaging guidelines for the Desktop Files > secti

[pkgdb] perl-Config-Tiny ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Config-Tiny in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Config-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje

[pkgdb] perl-Config-Tiny ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Config-Tiny in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Config-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

[pkgdb] perl-Config-Tiny ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Config-Tiny in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Config-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

[pkgdb] perl-Params-Coerce ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Params-Coerce in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Params-Coerce -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorap

[pkgdb] perl-Params-Coerce ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Params-Coerce in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Params-Coerce -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproj

[pkgdb] perl-Params-Coerce ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Params-Coerce in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Params-Coerce -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproj

[pkgdb] perl-Params-Coerce ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Params-Coerce in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Params-Coerce -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedora

[pkgdb] perl-Params-Coerce ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Params-Coerce in Fedora EPEL 4 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Params-Coerce -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedora

[pkgdb] perl-Params-Coerce ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Params-Coerce in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Params-Coerce -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedora

Re: qrencode in critical path?

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Jackson wrote: > kdebase pulls in the world, film at 11. IMHO we really need to remove kde* from critpath, it just doesn't scale. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[pkgdb] perl-List-MoreUtils ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-List-MoreUtils in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-List-MoreUtils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedor

[pkgdb] perl-List-MoreUtils ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-List-MoreUtils in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-List-MoreUtils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapr

[pkgdb] perl-List-MoreUtils ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-List-MoreUtils in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-List-MoreUtils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapr

[pkgdb] perl-Data-OptList ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Data-OptList in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Data-OptList -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

[pkgdb] perl-Data-OptList ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Data-OptList in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Data-OptList -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec

[pkgdb] perl-Data-OptList ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Data-OptList in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Data-OptList -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraprojec

[pkgdb] perl-Class-MOP ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-MOP in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-MOP -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.o

[pkgdb] perl-Class-MOP ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-MOP in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-MOP -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

[pkgdb] perl-Class-MOP ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-MOP in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-MOP -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

[pkgdb] perl-Class-MOP ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-MOP in Fedora EPEL 4 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-MOP -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

[pkgdb] perl-Class-MOP ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Class-MOP in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Class-MOP -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 760944] perl-Bio-SamTools-1.33 is available

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760944 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added --

[pkgdb] perl-Sub-Name ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Sub-Name in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Name -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[pkgdb] perl-Sub-Name ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Sub-Name in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Name -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

[pkgdb] perl-Sub-Name ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Sub-Name in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Name -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

[pkgdb] perl-Sub-Name ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Sub-Name in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Name -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] perl-Sub-Name ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Sub-Name in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Name -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] perl-Sub-Name ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Sub-Name in Fedora EPEL 4 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Sub-Name -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or

[pkgdb] perl-Test-Perl-Critic ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-Perl-Critic in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-Perl-Critic -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.f

[pkgdb] perl-Test-Perl-Critic ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-Perl-Critic in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-Perl-Critic -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedo

[pkgdb] perl-Test-Perl-Critic ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-Perl-Critic in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-Perl-Critic -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedo

[pkgdb] perl-Expect ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Expect in Fedora devel is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Expect -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

[pkgdb] perl-Expect ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Expect in Fedora 16 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Expect -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

[pkgdb] perl-Expect ownership changed

2012-01-11 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Expect in Fedora 15 is now owned by pghmcfc To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Expect -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

  1   2   >